2020, Number 4
<< Back
Rev Cub Oftal 2020; 33 (4)
Corneal injuries: suture to complete or partial thickness?
Cárdenas DT
Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 1-3
PDF size: 206.31 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Lovald ST, Rau A, Nissman S, et al. Finite element analysis and experimentalevaluation of penetrating injury through the cornea. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;66:104-10. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. jmbbm. 2016. 11. 001
Zheng K, Huang H, Peng K, et al. Change of optical intensity during healing processof corneal wound on anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Sci Rep. 2016;6(32352):1–6.
Myer CM, Johnson CM, Postma GN, Weinberger PM. Comparison of tensile strengthof fibrin glue and suture in microflap closure. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(1):167–70.
Wang T, Zhu L, Peng Y, et al. Photochemical crosslinking for penetrating cornealwound closure in enucleated porcine eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2017;42(11):1413–9.
Ljubimov AV, Saghizadeh M. Progress in corneal wound healing. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015;49:17-45. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. preteyeres. 2015. 07. 002
Dalma-Weiszhausz J, Galván-Chávez M, Guinto-Arcos EB, Miyake-Martínez DY. Rodríguez-Reyes A, Golzarri MF, et. al. Full- versus partial-thickness sutures: experimental models of corneal injury repair. Int Ophthalmol. 2020. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10792-020-01585-0
Full text