medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Periodontología

ISSN 2007-4360 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 1-3

<< Back

Rev Mex Periodontol 2020; 11 (1-3)

Enucleation of periapical cyst and placement of dental implant in anterior sector: Clinical case report

Umanzor BVA, Romero AHH, Sabillón EKE, Kafati ÁZA, Gabrie EME
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/102643

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/102643
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/102643

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 22-27
PDF size: 353.75 Kb.


Key words:

Dental implant, periapical cyst, surgical guide, digital planning.

ABSTRACT

The placement of a single dental implant is one of the most challenging procedures for the dentist at the surgical moment because it must imitate the nature of other teeth, since function and aesthetics are its main objective, but in order to comply with these requirements, it is necessary to carry out an adequate treatment plan supported by radiographic and clinical examinations and bear in mind that it is not only necessary to evaluate the tissues in the area where the implant will be placed, but also the surrounding tissues of adjacent teeth to avoid future complications and ensure the treatment long-term success. Currently, new technological advances facilitate the detection of bone pathologies or alterations that may affect the placement or osseointegration of dental implants, creating an opportunity to make a more accurate diagnosis and treatment plan and thus be able to correct any alteration that could promote treatment failure. In this case, the presence of a periapical cyst that did not directly interfere with the placement of the dental implant is presented, since it was at the dental organ 2.1 level and the dental implant was placed to substitute the 2.3, however, it was decided to do its removal, since not removing it could increase its size and affect the osseointegration process of the implant in the long term.


REFERENCES

  1. Block MS. Dental implants: the last 100 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2018; 76 (1): 11-26. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278239117312491

  2. Li J, Jansen JA, Walboomers XF, van den Beucken JJ. Mechanical aspects of dental implants and osseointegration: A narrative review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mate [Internet]. 2020; 103: 103574. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1751616118315728

  3. Alghamdi A, Al-Motari K, Sundar C, Jansen JA, Alghamdi H. Dental implants and bone grafts materials and biological issues [Internet]. Elsevier; 2020. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081024782000027

  4. Morton D, Phasuk K, Polido WD, Lin WS, Consideration for contemporary implant surgery. Dent Clin N Am [Internet]. 2019; 63 (2): 309-329. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0011853218300995

  5. Rajendra Santosh AB. Odontogenic cysts. Dent Clin N Am [Internet]. 2020; 64 (1): 105-119. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0011853219300709?via%3Dihub

  6. García-Calderón AG, Donohue-Cornejo A, Cuevas-González MV, Ávila-Valdéz R, Cuevas-González JC. Periimplantitis: revisión de la literatura. Int J Odontostomat [Internet]. 2016; 10 (2): 255-260. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-381X2016000200011

  7. Fiorellini J, Wada K, Sarmiento HL, Klokkevold P. Peri-implant anatomy, biology, and function. In: Newman M, Takei H, Klokkevold P, Carranza F. Newman and Carranza's clinical periodontology. 13th edition. New York: Elsevier; 2019. pp. 4024-4076.

  8. Díaz Arredondo DO, Olivar Cedeño JM, López Torres I, Correa Hinojosa H. Manejo multidisciplinario de quiste periapical. Reporte de caso. Rev Mex Estomatol. 2018; 5 (2):14-17.

  9. Nasseh I, Al-Rawi W. Cone beam computed tomography. Dent Clin N Am [Internet]. 2018; 62 (3): 361-391. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001185321830017X

  10. Walker-Finch K, Ucer C. Five-year survival rates for implants placed using digitally-designed static surgical guides: a systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 2020; 58 (3): 268-276. Available in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026643561930796X




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Periodontol. 2020;11