medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2021; 35 (4)

Hallux valgus mild and moderate; treatment by minimally invasive surgery and its follow-up to 2 years

King-Martínez A, Estevez-Jaramillo M, King-Hayata M, Martínez-de AM, Cuellar-Avaroma A
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/103308

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/103308
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/103308

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 305-310
PDF size: 211.82 Kb.


Key words:

Hallux valgus, treatment, minimal invasive surgery, results.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The hallux valgus is a very frequent and complex orthopedic pathology. It involves the bone and soft tissue structures of the first toe. There are multiple techniques described for the alignment of the first toe. All technics aim to restore the normal angulation of the toe while using a stable osteotomy through a painless surgical procedure. The minimal invasive techniques have been growing in acceptance since the year 2000, as a viable surgical alternative to treat this pathology. Material and methods: We included patients with a diagnostic of mild or moderate hallux valgus on whom a minimal invasive procedure was performed to correct the deformity of the first toe. We performed a distal Reverdin/Isham osteotomy on the first metatarsal and an akin osteotomy in the proximal phalanx, a lateral capsular release and a abductor tenotomy. These patients were followed for 24 months after their surgery. Results: Our patients had an adequate correction angular correction, for a distal osteotomy. They had a good pain control, with an adequate mobility in the postoperative period. The patients presented an adequate personal satisfaction, 87% of them had good results. We found an important and statistically significant improvement in the Kitaoka scale. Conclusion: The minimal invasive technics for the correction of mild or moderated hallux valgus are a good alternative. Our patients are satisfied with the functional, and cosmetic results.


REFERENCES

  1. Secretaría de Salud. Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de hallux valgus. Ciudad de México; 2013.

  2. Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B. Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010; 3: 21.

  3. Canale T, Beaty JH. Pie y tobillo. In: Elsevier, editor. Campbell de cirugía ortopédica. Nashville, Tennesee; 2015. 9344.

  4. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Marinozzi A, Denaro V. Hallux valgus: effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2011; 97: 149-67.

  5. Trnka H, Krenn S, Schuh R. Minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery : a critical review of the evidence. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(9): 1731-5.

  6. Van Groningen Bart, Van der Steen MC, Reijman M, Bos J, Hendriks JG. Outcomes in chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus in a large cohort. Foot. 2016; 29: 18-24.

  7. Cuellar AA, King HM, Martínez AMC, King MAC, De la Concha BF, et al. Corrección de hallux valgus mediante técnica percutánea. Med Sur. 2011; 18(2): 40-5.

  8. Agel J, Beskin JL, Brage M, Guyton GP, Kadel NJ, Saltzman CL, et al. Reliability of the foot function index: a report of the AOFAS outcomes committee. Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26(11): 962-7.

  9. Brogan K, Ed M, Lindisfarne E, Eng M, Akehurst H, Farook U, et al. Minimally invasive and open distal chevron osteotomy for mild to moderate hallux valgus. Am Orthop Foot Ankle Soc. 2016; 37(11): 1197-204.

  10. Botezatu I, Marinescu R, Laptoiu D. Minimally invasive – percutaneous surgery – recent developments of the foot surgery techniques. J Med Life. 2015; 8: 87-93.

  11. Bauer T, De Lavigne C, Biau D, De Prado M, Isham S, Laffenétre O. Percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: a prospective multicenter study of 189 cases. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009; 40(4): 505-14.

  12. Magnan B, Bondi M, Mezzari S, Bonetti I, Samaila E. Minimally invasive surgery of the forefoot: current concept review. Int J Clin Med. 2013; 4: 11-9.

  13. Bauer T. Percutaneous forefoot surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100(1): 191-204.

  14. De Prado M. Complications in minimally invasive foot surgery Minimal-invasive Fubchirurgie: Komplikationen. Fub und Sprunggelenk. 2013; 11(2): 83-94.

  15. Biz C, Fosser M, Dalmau-Pastor M, Corradin M, Rodà MG, Aldegheri R, et al. Functional and radiographic outcomes of hallux valgus correction by mini-invasive surgery with Reverdin-Isham and Akin percutaneous osteotomies: a longitudinal prospective study with a 48-month follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016; 11: 157-70.

  16. Giannini S, Faldini C, Nanni M, Martino A Di, Luciani D, Vannini F. A minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI). Int Orthop. 2013; 37(9): 1805-13.

  17. Cuellar AA, De Lavigne C, Guillo S, Jambou S, King-Martinez AC. Técnica híbrida para la corrección de hallux valgus moderado y severo. Tobillo y Pie. 2012; 5(1): 21-8.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

IV




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2021 Jul-Ago;35