medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2021, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2021; 81 (6)

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of urinary lithiasis in children

Rodríguez-Gómez Y, González-León T, Victoria-Labrada M, Mercantete-Martínez A

Language: English
References: 28
Page:
PDF size: 231.26 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is an option for the treatment of urinary lithiasis.
Objective: To describe the outcomes of ESWL for the treatment of urinary lithiasis in children.
Methods: A descriptive and retrospective study of 51 patients with urinary lithiasis that underwent ESWL from 2014 to 2019.
Results: Males and 15–18-year-old patients prevailed; 27.4% had prior surgery; 10-20 mm lithiasis of renal location and density between 400- 799 HU were the most common; a double J stent was the most utilized urinary derivation prior to lithotripsy treatment; 7.8% required retreatment; 13.7% additional interventions; the stone-free rate was 74.5% at one month and 92.2% at three months. The size of the lithiasis was associated with the success of the treatment (p‹0.023). The most frequent complication was steinstrasse; endourologic procedures were the most utilized, grade III b (Clavien-Dindo) prevailed and were associated to older patients (p=0.04), renal lithiasis localization (p=0.017), larger size (p=0.08), and density (p=0.036).
Conclusions: ESWL is effective and safe for treating urinary lithiasis in children. Its success was significantly associated to smaller stone size and its complications to patients of older age, larger stone size, density and renal localization of the lithiasis.


REFERENCES

  1. Bjazevic J, Razvi H. Stones in pregnancy and pediatrics. Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):223–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.05.006

  2. Pietropaolo A, Proietti S, Jones P, Rangarajan K, Aboumarzouk O, Giusti G, et al. Trends of intervention for paediatric stone disease over the last two decades (2000–2015): A systematic review of literature. Arab J Urol. 2017 Nov 20;15(4):306–11. doi: https://dx.doi. org/10.1016%2Fj.aju.2017.10.006

  3. Samotyjek J, Jurkiewicz B, Krupa A. Surgical treatment methods of urolithiasis in the pediatric population. Dev Period Med. 2018;22(1):88–93. doi: https://doi. org/10.34763/devperiodmed.20182201.8893

  4. Gündüz M, Sekmenli T, Ciftci İ, Elmacı AM. Do JJ Stents Increase the Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Renal Stones? Urol Int. 2017;98(4):425–8. doi: 10.1159/000452451

  5. Jee JY, Kim SD, Cho WY. Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric and Adolescent Urolithiasis. Korean J Urol. 2013 Dec;54(12):865–9. doi: https:// dx.doi.org/10.4111%2Fkju.2013.54.12.865

  6. Lu J, Sun X, He L, Wang Y. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Dec;25(12):1109–12. doi: https://doi. org/10.1007/s00383-009-2489-5

  7. Aydogdu O, Karakose A, Celik O, Atesci YZ. Recent management of urinary stone disease in a pediatric population. World J Clin Pediatr. 2014 Feb 8;3(1):1–5. doi: https://dx.doi. org/10.5409%2Fwjcp.v3.i1.1

  8. Özgür BC, Irkilata L, Ekici M, Hoşcan MB, Sarici H, Yücetürk CN, et al. Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: multi-institutional results. Urologia. 2016 May 24;83(2):83–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5301/urologia.5000053

  9. Telli O, Gokce MI, Ozturk E, Suer E, Mermerkaya M, Afandiyev F, et al. What is the best option for 10-20mm renal pelvic stones undergoing ESWL in the pediatric population: stenting, alpha blockers or conservative follow-up? J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Sep;50(9):1532–4. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.045

  10. Shouman AM, Ghoneim IA, ElShenoufy A, Ziada AM. Safety of ungated shockwave lithotripsy in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Apr;5(2):119–21. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.10.007

  11. Badawy AA, Saleem MD, Abolyosr A, Aldahshoury M, Elbadry MSB, Abdalla MA, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):661–6. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0133-0

  12. Labrada Rodríguez MV, Larrea Masvidal E, Castillo Rodríguez M, Borrero Barriento L, Valdés Gómez A. Experiencia en Cuba del tratamiento de la litiasis renoureteral con litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque en niños. Rev Cubana Pediatr. 2012 Jun;84(2):126–36.

  13. Iqbal N, Assad S, Rahat Aleman Bhatti J, Hasan A, Shabbir MU, Akhter S. Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis Between Children and Adults: A Single Centre Study. Cureus. 8(9):e810. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.7759%2Fcureus.810

  14. Alsagheer G, Abdel-Kader MS, Hasan AM, Mahmoud O, Mohamed O, Fathi A, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy in children: Predictors of successful outcome. J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Oct;13(5):515.e1-515.e5. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.029

  15. Asi T, Dogan HS, Altan M, Bozaci AC, Ceylan T, Asci A, et al. Shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones as a first-line therapy in children younger than 2 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):193. e1-193.e6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol. 2020.01.001

  16. Seckiner I, Seckiner S, Sen H, Bayrak O, Dogan K, Erturhan S. A neural network - based algorithm for predicting stone - free status after ESWL therapy. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Dec;43(6):1110–4. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538. IBJU.2016.0630

  17. Jeong U-S, Lee S, Kang J, Han DH, Park KH, Baek M. Factors affecting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for unilateral urinary stones in children: a 17-year single-institute experience. Korean J Urol. 2013 Jul;54(7):460–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.4111/ kju.2013.54.7.460

  18. Yazici O, Tuncer M, Sahin C, Demirkol MK, Kafkasli A, Sarica K. Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors. Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Aug;41(4):676–82. doi: https://doi. org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2014.0330

  19. McAdams S, Shukla AR. Pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Predicting successful outcomes. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(4):544–8. doi: https://dx.doi. org/10.4103%2F0970-1591.74457

  20. He Q, Xiao K, Chen Y, Liao B, Li H, Wang K. Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12894-019-0520-2

  21. Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24;(11):CD007044. doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.cd007044.pub3

  22. Akin Y, Yucel S. Long-term effects of pediatric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on renal function. Res Rep Urol. 2014;6:21–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/rru.s40965

  23. Soygur T, Arikan N, Kilic O, Suer E. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: evaluation of the results considering the need for auxiliary procedures. J Pediatr Urol. 2006 Oct;2(5):459–63. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.11.003

  24. Lu P, Wang Z, Song R, Wang X, Qi K, Dai Q, et al. The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):199–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5

  25. Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Arnhem: European Association of Urology; 2017. 84 p.

  26. Garrido-Abad P, Rodríguez-Cabello MÁ, Platas- Sancho A. Análisis de los factores predictores de éxito en el tratamiento de la litiasis urinaria mediante litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque. Optimización de la selección de pacientes: Score LEOC. Arch esp urol. 2017;715–24.

  27. León TG. Tratamiento quirúrgico de la litiasis ureteral en el adulto. Rev Cubana Urol. 2013;2(1):95–112.

  28. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187–96. doi: https://doi. org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b13ca2




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com