medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Acta Médica 2021; 22 (1)

Comparison of two surgical techniques for managing facial aging and used at ''Hermanos Ameijeiras'' clinical-surgical hospital

Tamayo CAM, Cairos BJN, Henao SJC, Cuastumal FDK

Language: Spanish
References: 33
Page:
PDF size: 222.43 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Aging is a natural, unique and particular process for each individual. Although it is governed mainly by genetic load, there are multiple treatments that delay it. The outcomes are presented of the surgical managment of cervicofacial flaccidity with two surgical techniques.
Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes of facial rejuvenation by means of either cervicofacial rhytidectomy with plication or superficial musculoaponeurotic system dissection.
Method: A randomized, longitudinal, prospective and comparative study was carried out, for which the sample was divided into two groups. The universe was made up of all the patients with clinical signs of facial aging who attended the outpatient consultation of plastic surgery at Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical-Surgical Hospital. Patients with prolonged use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), previous facial surgeries, congenital or acquired facial deformities, active dermatological diseases, decompensated systemic diseases, psychiatric diseases, Ehler-Danlos syndrome, keloids, without preoperative photographic control, smokers and pregnant women were excluded. The sample consisted of sixteen patients undergoing cervicofacial rhytidectomy. The group I (study) was made up of nine patients operated on by plication. The group II (control) was made up of seven patients operated on by dissection.
Results: There was a predominance of patients aged more than 60 years old, of the female sex, with mixed skin and stage III of facial aging in the preoperative period, as well as stage I of facial aging in the postoperative period in both groups. To assess the aesthetic outcomes, the nasolabial fold, mandibular lip, as well as the curvature of the cheek and neck were examined. In the patients from group I, the outcomes were good (77.7%) or fair (22.3%), while in the patients from group II, the outcomes were good (85.7%) or fair (14.3%). No complications or poor outcomes were identified.
Conclusions: In most patients, it was possible to decrease at least one stage in the degree of aging, with facial symmetry, little visible scar and without complication. No statistically significant differences were found.


REFERENCES

  1. Chan M. Informe Mundial sobre el envejecimiento y la salud. OMS Organización mundial de la salud. 2015[acceso:12/7/2020]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/world-report-2015/es/

  2. Jacono A, Malone H, Thomas J. Nonsurgical Facial Rejuvenation Procederus in Patients Under 50 Prior to Undergoing Facelift: Habits, Costs, and Results. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2017;37(4):448-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw217

  3. Carriquiry C. Corrección quirúrgica del envejecimiento facial. Tendencias en medicina, 2011[acceso:12/7/2020];38(05):85-96. Disponible en: http://www.tendenciasenmedicina.com/Imagenes/imagenes36/art_24.pdf

  4. Dane M, Casanueva F, Wang T. Evolution of the Rhytidectomy. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2016;2(1):38-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2015.12.001

  5. Kurban RS, Bhawan J. Histologic Changes in Skin Associated with Aging. The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology, 1990;16(10):94-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1990.tb01554.x

  6. Jacubovsky L. Cirugía del envejecimiento. Revista Médica Clínica Los Condes. 2004[acceso:12/7/2020];15(1):20-7. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-401534

  7. Pérez T, González C, González B. Aging, Elderly and Quality of Life: Sucess or Difficulty? Revista de enfermedades no transmisibles Finlay. 2018[acceso:23/7/2020];8(1):59-65. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=78214

  8. Malcolm P, Calvert J, Evans G. The Evolution of the Midface Lift in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2006;117(6):1809-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000218839.55122.c0

  9. Jacubovsky D. Facial rejuvenation. Revista médica clínica Los Condes. 2010;21(1):99-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0716-8640(10)70511-3

  10. Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plastic and Reconstructive surgery. 1976;58(80):122-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197607000-00013

  11. Guevara N. Impactos de la institucionalización en la vejez. Análisis frente a los cambios demográficos actuales. Entramado, 2016;12(1):138-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2016v12n1.23110

  12. Goodkind D, He W, Kowal P. An Aging World 2015 international reports. Washington: National institute on Aging; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1088.9362

  13. Jacono A. Extended Smas Facelift. Medscape. 2018[acceso:12/7/2020];1(3). Disponible en: https://emedecine.medscape.com/article/1818692-overview#a1

  14. Vallarta Rodriguez RA, Ruiz Treviño JJ, Guerrero F, Ferrero E, Velez BE. Ritidoplastia compuesta biplanar con restauración de volumenes. Cir.Plas.Iberolatinoam.2015;41(4):349-58. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376- 78922015000400002

  15. Choi J, Hwang K. Comparison of Hamra's and Mendelson's Models of Midface Lift. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(8):2632-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000005884

  16. Surek CC. Facial Anatomy for Filler Injection: The Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Is Not Just for Facelifting. Clin Plast Surg. 2019;46(4):603-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2019.06.007

  17. Daher M, Rodriguez Muñiz A. The Eutrophic Rhytidoplasty Subdermal Tunneling and Minimal Skin Undermining. Eur J Plastic Surgery. 2015;36(2):87-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00238-012-0767-2. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00238-012-0767-2

  18. Desio ED, Revelli V, Vergara JF. Análisis retorspectivo de la técnica ritidoplastia durante 7 años 2001-2008, [tesis doctoral] Medellín: Instituto de ciencias de la salud CES. 2009. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10946/811

  19. Floyd EM, Sukato D, Perkins S. Advance In Face Lift Techniques, 2013-2018 A Sistematic Review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(3):252-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1472

  20. Mole B, Claveria G. Ritidoplastia con doble anclaje. Una técnica para principiantes. Cirugía plástica Iberolatinoamericana. 2015;39(3):231-41. DOI: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/cpil/v39n3/original4.pdf

  21. Kleinberger A, Jeffrey H. What is the Best Method for Minimizing the Risk of Hematoma Formation After Rhytidectomy? The Laryngoscope. 2015;125(1):534-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24685

  22. Troche E. Eficacia de la plicatura o disección del sistema músculo aponeurótico superficial para el tratamiento del envejecimiento facial. [tesis postgrado] La Habana: Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico “Hermanos Ameijeiras”, 2000.

  23. Mena R. Eficacia de la técnica de plicatura o disección del SMAS. [tesis postgrado] La Habana: Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico “Hermanos Ameijeiras”. 2006.

  24. Lizcano Fernández. Composición étnica de las tres áreas culturales del Continente Americano al comienzo del siglo XXI. Convergencia. 2005.[acceso: 12/7/2020];12(38):185-232. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10503808

  25. Karimi K, Reivitis A. Lifting the Lower Face With an Absorbable Polydioxanone (PDO) Thread. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(9):932-4. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28915290/

  26. Goulart R, Scipioni AP. Ritidoplastia: Sutura del sistema SMAS Platisma e importancia de la filosofía de la naturalidad. Cir. Plas.Iberolatinoam. 2013;39(2):105-19. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376- 78922013000200001

  27. Kaye KO, Kästner S, Paprottka FJ, Gonser P. The liquid facelift: First hands-on experience with facial water jet-assisted liposuction as an additive technique for rhytidectomy - a case series of 25 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(2):171-7. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29175136/

  28. Kalantar H, Shahrokh S. Prefabricated Skin Excision in Face Lift: A Simplified Technique. World J Plast Surg. 2019;8(1):62-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/wjps.8.1.62

  29. Floyd M. Advances in Faces-Lift Techniques a Systematic Review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(3):252-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1472

  30. Baker DC. Complications of cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg. 1983;10(3):543-62. DOI: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6627843/

  31. Lambros V. Models of Facial Aging and Implications for Treatment. Clin Plast Surgery. 2018;35(2):319-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2008.02.012

  32. Sapountzis S. Successful treatment of thread-lifting complication from APTOS sutures using a simple MACS lift and fat grafting. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(6):1307-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9975-1

  33. Ramirez Lara EJ, Campbel Salomon L, Prada Gonzales L, Adams Perez L, Santiso Ramos M, Mamani Choque E. Resultados de la ritidoplastia facial en el Hospital General Provincial Docente “Dr. Antonio Luaces Iraola” en el periodo 2000-2015. Mediciego. 2017;23(2):37-44. Disponible en: http://www.revmediciego.sld.cu/index.php/mediciego/article/view/663




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com