Hamui SL, Vives VT

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 97-102
PDF size: 379.68 Kb.

ABSTRACT

This article focuses on the data analysis phase in qualitative research. After locating the investigative moment in which the hermeneutical act takes place, different strategies are presented to approach the data analysis. The paper focuses on the proposal of analytical questions. Based on the texts of Jackson and Mazzei, the assembly of data and theories is described in three movements: first, the disruption of binomials like theory / practice, subject / object, inside / outside, researched / researcher, to understand the way they constitute each other; second, the elaboration of analytical questions based on authors’ concepts to think about the data; and third, evince the flexibility of both when being stressed to reveal socio-cultural processes of interest and generate new knowledge.

REFERENCES

1. Guillemette F. L’approche de la Grounded Theory; pour innover? Recherches qualitatives. 2006;26(1):32-50.

2. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine Press; 1967.

3. Goulding C. Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. 1998;1(1):50-7.

4. Annells M. Grounded theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigms of inquiry, and postmodemism. Qualitative Health Research. 1996;6(3):379-93.

5. Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1992.

6. Wells K. The strategy of Grounded theory: Possibilities and problems. Social Work Research. 1995;19(1):33-7.

7. Mills S. Discourse. London: Routledge; 2007. p. 1-20.

8. Pardo N. Cómo hacer análisis crítico de discurso. Una perspectiva latinoamericana. Santiago de Chile: Frais; 2007.

9. Cisterna F. Categorización y triangulación como proceso de validación del conocimiento en investigación cualitativa. Theoría. 2005;14(1):61-71.

10. Reissman C. Narrative Analysis. UK: Sage Publications; 1993.

11. González Rojas JM. Exploración de las herramientas metodológicas para la producción de las narrativas. En Hamui L, et al. Narrativas del Padecer. Aproximaciones teóricometodológicas. México: Facultad de Medicina, UNAM y Manual Moderno; 2019: 89-134.

12. Jackson AY, Mazzei LA. Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York: Routledge; 2012.

13. St. Pierre EA. Afterword: decentring voice in qualitative inquiry. En Jackson A y Mazzei L (eds). Voice in qualitative inquiry. London: Routledge; 2009. p. 221-36.

14. Lather P. Getting lost: feminist efforts toward a double(d) science. Albany: Suny Press; 2007.

15. Derridá J. Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences. En: Newton KM (ed.) Twentieth Century Literary Theory. London: Palgrave; 1997. p. 115-120.

16. Laclau E, Mouffe C. Hegemonía y estrategia socialista. Hacia la radicalización de la democracia. Argentina: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2004.

17. Foucault M. La arqueóloga del saber. México: Siglo Veintiuno Editores; 1970.

18. Deluze G, Wattari F. A thousand plateaus: capitalism & schisophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1987. p. 4.

19. Bourdieu P. Respuestas por una antropología reflexiva. México: Editorial Grijalbo; 1995.

20. Castoriadis C. La institución imaginaria de la sociedad. México: Tusquets editores; 2013.

21. Butler J. El género en disputa. El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Barcelona: Paidós; 2007.

22. Hamui Sutton L. La Facultad de Medicina de la UNAM en transición hacia el paradigma de las competencias. Un modelo de evaluación curricular cualitativa. México: Díaz de Santos. Facultad de Medicina, UNAM; 2015. p. 117-8.