medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2022; 82 (1)

Polymer clips (Hem-o-lok®) for renal vessel control in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: 12 years of experience in a Tertiary Care Center

Tena-González-Méndez G, Peña-Islas MA, Hernández-Pañeda, Humberto; Gabilondo-Pliego, Bernardo; Rodríguez-Covarrubias FT
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 20
Page:
PDF size: 292.88 Kb.


Key words:

Kidney transplantation, Living donor, Laparoscopy, Nephrectomy, Vascular closure devices.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe our experience using polymer clips (Hem-o-lok®) for renal vessel control in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN).
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective and descriptive analysis from our database of all minimally invasive living donor nephrectomies (hand-assisted and pure laparoscopic) performed from 2008 to 2020 in our institution. We included patients who underwent LLDN using polymer clips (Hem-o-lok®) for vascular control of renal arteries and veins, and whose clinical records were complete.
Results: 330 LLDN were performed, 183 (55.5%) were hand-assisted nephrectomies and 147 (44.5%) were pure laparoscopic nephrectomies. Mean warm ischemia time (WIT) was 3.98 minutes and median of estimated blood loss (EBL) was 100±140 ml. Four patients (1.2%) required conversion to an open procedure due to vascular injury. 31 complications (9.3%) were registered, of which 23 (6.9%) were non-life-threatening complications. No deaths nor loss of renal grafts were reported.
Limitations: the main drawbacks of this study are its retrospective nature, and that it is limited to only one center. Originality and value: It is a study that questions the contraindication issued by the FDA for the use of polymer clips for vascular control in LLDN, demonstrating its use is a safe and effective option.
Conclusion: The use of polymer clips, specifically Hem-o-lok®, is a safe method for vascular control of the renal hilum vessels in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies.


REFERENCES

  1. Gupta N, Raina P, Kumar A. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Minim Access Surg. 2005;1(4):155–64. doi: https://doi. org/10.4103/0972-9941.19262

  2. Fonouni H, Mehrabi A, Golriz M, Zeier M, Müller-Stich BP, Schemmer P, et al. Comparison of the laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: an overview of surgical complications and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399(5):543–51. doi: https://doi. org/10.1007/s00423-014-1196-4

  3. Villeda-Sandoval CI, Rodríguez-Covarrubias F, Cortés-Aguilar G, Alberú-Gómez J, Vilatobá-Chapa M, Sotomayor M, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative and functional results in a tertiary care center in Mexico. Transplant Proc. 2013;45(9):3220–4. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.03.055

  4. Razón-Gutiérrez JE, Villeda Sandoval C, Rodríguez-Covarrubias F. Experiencia en nefrectomía laparoscópica de donador en un centro de tercer nivel. Rev Mex Urol. 2011;71(3):151–5.

  5. McGregor TB, Patel P, Chan G, Sener A. Hilar control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Practice patterns in Canada. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2017;11(10):321–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4490

  6. Kwazneski D, Six C, Stahlfeld K. The unacknowledged incidence of laparoscopic stapler malfunction. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):86–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00464-012-2417-y

  7. Friedman AL, Peters TG, Ratner LE. Regulatory failure contributing to deaths of live kidney donors. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(4):829– 34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600- 6143.2011.03918.x

  8. Hsi RS, Ojogho ON, Baldwin DD. Analysis of techniques to secure the renal hilum during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: review of the FDA database. Urology. 2009;74(1):142–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.010

  9. Cabello R, García JV, Quicios C, Bueno G, González C. Is There a New Alternative for a Safer Kidney Artery Ligation in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy? Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2017;27(7):715–6. doi: https://doi. org/10.1089/lap.2016.0271

  10. Kocak B, Koffron AJ, Baker TB, Salvalaggio PRO, Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, et al. Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2006;67(5):927–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.11.023

  11. Chan D, Bishoff JT, Ratner L, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: early recognition and management. J Urol. 2000;164(2):319– 21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 5347(05)67349-1

  12. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT, Bellman GC, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology. 2002;60(3):415–9; discussion 419-420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090- 4295(02)01778-8

  13. Dekel Y, Mor E. Hem-o-lok clip dislodgment causing death of the donor after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplantation. 2008;86(6):887. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ tp.0b013e31818620b1

  14. Ponsky L, Cherullo E, Moinzadeh A, Desai M, Kaouk J, Haber G-P, et al. The Hem-o-lok clip is safe for laparoscopic nephrectomy: a multiinstitutional review. Urology. 2008;71(4):593– 6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. urology.2007.11.015

  15. Baumert H, Ballaro A, Arroyo C, Kaisary AV, Mulders PFA, Knipscheer BC. The Use of Polymer (Hem-o-lok) Clips for Management of the Renal Hilum During Laparoscopic Nephrectomy. European Urology. 2006;49(5):816–9. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.073

  16. Bittner JG, Sajadi K, Brown JA. Comparison of renal artery occlusion techniques in handassisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(6):933–7. doi: https://doi. org/10.1089/end.2008.0297

  17. Siqueira TM, Mitre AI, Simoes FA, Maciel AF, Ferraz AM, Arap S. A cost-effective technique for pure laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2006;32(1):23–8; discussion 28-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677- 55382006000100004

  18. Vinson AJ, Rose C, Kiberd BA, Odutayo A, Kim SJ, Alwayn I, et al. Factors Associated With Prolonged Warm Ischemia Time Among Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplant Direct. 2018;4(5):e342. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000000781

  19. Liu Y, Huang Z, Chen Y, Liao B, Luo D, Gao X, et al. Staplers or clips?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vessel controlling devices for renal pedicle ligation in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(45):e13116. doi: https://doi. org/10.1097/md.0000000000013116

  20. Chan D, Fabrizio M, Ratner L, Kavoussi L. Complications of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The first 175 cases. Transplantation proceedings. 2000;32:778. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0041-1345(00)00979-9




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2022;82