medigraphic.com

2004, Number s1

<< Back Next >>

Arch Cardiol Mex 2004; 74 (s1)

Chest pain syndrome with normal or non diagnostic ECG in the emergency unit. Evaluation through myocardial perfusion (SPECT) and of ventricular function (Gated-SPECT)

Bialostozky D

Language: Spanish
References: 43
Page: 18-31
PDF size: 319.87 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The arrival of a patient with chest pain syndrome (precordial) to the emergency represents a diagnostic challenge for the physician. Around 6 million persons are seen each year at the Emergency units in the USA. More than half of the patients are admitted for their cardiac evaluation. Its cardiac origin is confirmed in 10 to 15%, and about 15% of them develop myocardial infarction. However, 5 to 10% of patients are dismissed and develop myocardial infarction during the next 48 h. The diagnosis of the infarct is inadvertent and/or patient is not hospitalized in 2 to 8%. The mortality rate is duplicated in none hospitalized patients. Frequently, a conservative observation conduct and/or diagnostic expectation is taken, with the consequent saturation of the intensive care unit that looses its critical character and avoids quick mobilization of the patient with an increase in costs. The clinical judgment, a meticulous clinical history, and careful physical examination play a key role in the differential diagnosis of the precordial pain syndrome; however, pain can be atypical, absent or manifest as an equivalent of pain, which does not exclude the diagnosis of myocardial infarction or ischemia. Likewise, chest pain in the presence of a normal conventional ECG at rest, non-diagnostic or with minimal variations, does not rule out the possibility of a coronary obstruction and does not mean that the pain is not of coronary origin. Other characteristics of the ECG, such as T wave and ST segment alterations, bundle branch block (BBB), LV hypertrophy, interpretation discrepancies, can pose doubts or mistakes in the diagnosis. Although its diagnostic information is essential, other non-invasive laboratory tests are needed, such as the treadmill stress ECG, serial bioenzymatic markers, and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT and Gated-SPECT) at restorunder physical pharmacologic stress. The advantages and disadvantages of the stress ECG, the echocardiography, magnetic resonance and PET are mentioned. The advantages of the SPECT and Gated-SPECT in the diagnosis and prognosis are: 1) great diagnostic objectivity; 2) high sensitivity and specificity; 3) diagnosis does not depend on evolution time of the ischemia and/or infarction, since SPECT diagnoses the initial primary modifications of ischemia; 4) diagnosis is achieved within the established limit of time, in less than 4 to 6 hours. The designed protocols allow to obtain the diagnosis between 30 min and 1:30 h; 5) assesses the myocardium at risk; 6) stratifies the risk and prognosis; 7) defines the site and 8) the involved coronary artery(ies); 9) provides the functional significance of the anatomic obstruction; 10) quantifies the ventricular function, i.e., ejection fraction, systolic and diastolic volumes, systolic thickening, ventricular failure signs; 11) provides three-dimensional visualization of the mobility of the left ventricular wall; 12) diagnoses simultaneously the associated presence of ischemia and/or infarction of the right ventricle; 13) its high negative predictive value allows to dismiss immediately and with a great safety margin those patients in whom SPECT revealed normal perfusion; 14) costs are reduced without adversely compromising the safety of the patients. We describe the algorithm used as guideline for the early diagnosis in the presence or absence of ischemic heart disease in the patient with precordial or chest pain syndrome with normal or non-diagnostic ECG at arrival to the emergency ward. It is necessary to modified the clinical educational patterns and to revaluate the advantages and limitations of the clinical history, physical exploration, as well as of the conventional ECG at rest and other diagnostic methods used specifically in relation to the chest pain syndrome with a normal or non diagnostic conventional ECG. SPECT and Gated-SPECT scintigraphy is considered as the best individual and isolated non-invasive test for the diagnostic solution of the precordial syndrome at the Emergency Unit.


REFERENCES

  1. Duncan BH, Heller GV: Acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging in the evaluation of patients with chest pain syndromes. ACC Curr J Rev 1999; 8: 52-6.

  2. Selker HP, Zelenski RJ: An evaluation of technologies for detecting acute coronary ischemia at the emergency department: a report from a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 29: 13-87.

  3. Lee TH, Cook E, Weisberg M: Impact of the availability of as prior ECG on the triage of the patient with acute chest pain. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: 381-8.

  4. Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woodland RH, Feldman JA, Beshjansky JR, et al: Missed Diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia in the Emergency Department. NEJM 2000; 342: 1163-70.

  5. McEarlean ES, Deluca SA, vanLente F, Peacock F 4th, Rao JS, Balong CA, Nissen SE: Comparison of troponin T versus creatinine kinase-MB in suspected acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 421-6.

  6. Kontos MC, Schmidt KL, McCue M, Rossiter LF, Jurgensen M, Nicholson CS, et al. A comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. J Nucl Cardiol 2003; 10: 284-90.

  7. Stowers S, Eisenstein EL, Wackers FR, Berman DS, Blackshear JL, Jones A, et al: An Economic Analysis of an Aggressive Diagnostic Strategy with Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Early Exercise Stress Testing in Emergency Department Patients Who Present With Chest Pain but Non Diagnostic Electrocardiograms: Results From a Randomized Trial. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35(1): 17-25.

  8. Schor S, Behar S, Modan B, Barrel V, Drory J, Kariv I: Disposition of presumed coronary patients from an emergency room: follow-up study. JAMA 1976; 236: 941-3.

  9. McCarthy BD, Beshansky JR, D’Agostino RB, Selker HP: Missed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: results from a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med 1993; 22: 579-82.

  10. Heller GV: Acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging in the emergency department. A technique whose time has come…. or gone? J Nucl Cardiol 2002; 9: 352-2.

  11. Torre J: La cardiología en el manuscrito de Martín de la Cruz y Juan Badiano. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1979; 49: 103-13.

  12. Heberden W: The chest pain. Some account of a disorder of the breast. M Tr Ry Coll Physicians 1772; 2: 59-67.

  13. Bialostozky D: Evaluación del Dolor Precordial en el Servicio de Urgencias. Papel de la Cardiología Nuclear. En: Diagnóstico de la Cardiopatía Isquémica. Un enfoque multidisciplinario. Editor Dr. Jesús Vargas Barrón. Editorial Médica Panamericana. México DF 1999: 213-24; 239-44.

  14. Bilodeau L, Théroux P, Grégoire J: Tc-99m-Sestamibi tomography in patients with spontaneous chest pain: correlations with clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1684-91.

  15. Kim SC, Adams SL, Hendel RC: Role of Nuclear Cardiology in the Evaluation of Acute Coronary Syndromes (Review). Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30: 210-18.

  16. 15a. Stowers SA, Abuan TH, Szymansky: Tc-99m-sestamibi SPECT and Tc-99m-stetrofosmin SPECT in prediction of cardiac events in patients injected during chest pain and following resolution of pain. J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 88 (Abstr).

  17. Cheng TO: Availability of prior electrocardiogram. Mayo Clin Proc 1992; 67: 305-6.

  18. Tsakonis JS: Safety of immediate treadmill testing in select emergency department patients with chest pain. Am J Emerg Med 1991; 9: 557-59.

  19. Lee TH, Cook E, Weisberg M, Sargent RK, Wilson C, Goldman L: Acute chest pain in the emergency room. Identification and examination of low-risk patients. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 65-9.

  20. The Healthy Heart Handbook for Women. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2003.

  21. Curzen N, Patel D, Clarke D, Wright C, Mulcahy D, Sullivan A, et al: Women with chest pain: is exercise testing worthwhile? Heart 1996; 76: 156-60.

  22. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Diercks DB, Lewis WR, Turnipseed SD: Immediate Exercise Testing to Evaluate Low-Risk Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Chest Pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 251-6.

  23. Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, Feldman JA, Griffith JL, Heller GV, et al: Myocardial Perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia. JAMA 2002; 288: 2693-700.

  24. Gibbons RJ: Chest pain triage ——Another step forward. JAMA 2002; 288: 2745-6.

  25. Taub CC, Heller GV: Imaging in the Emergency department. J Nucl Cardiol 2003; 10: 333-5.

  26. Bialostozky D, López-Meneses M, Crespo L, Puente-Barragán A, González-Pacheco H, Lupi-Herrera E, et al: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT) in the evaluation of patients in the Emergency room with precordial pain and normal or doubtful ischemic ECG. Study of 60 cases. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1999; 69: 34-45.

  27. 25a. Bialostozky D, Puente A, Casanova J, Cossio J, Crespo L, López M, et al: SPECT myocardial perfusion in the differential diagnosis of chest pain at the emergency room. J Nucl Cardiol 1997; 4: 46.l6 Abst.

  28. Bialostozky D, López-Meneses M , Crespo L, Lupi-Herera E: Assessment of chest pain in the Emergency room. Role of Nuclear Cardiology. Editorial. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 2000; 70: 121-9.

  29. Knott JC, Baldey AC, Grigg LE, Cameron PA, Lichtenstein M, Better N: Impact of acute chest pain Tc-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging on clinical management. J Nucl Cardiol 2002; 9: 257-62.

  30. Varetto T, Cantalupi D, Altieri A: Emergency room technetium sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial ischemic events in patients with non diagnostic eletrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1804-08.

  31. Tatum JL, Jesse RL, Kontos MC, Nicholson CS, Schmidt KL, Roberts CS, Ornato JP: Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 29: 116-25.

  32. Hilton TC, Thompson RC, Williams HJ: Tc-99m-sestamibi myocardial perfusion in the emergency room evaluation of chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1016-22.

  33. 30a. Reiker K, Sinusas AJ, Wackers FJ, Zaret BL: One year prognosis of patients with normal planar or single photon emission compute tomographic technetium 99m-m labeled sestamibi exercise imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1994; 1: 449-56.

  34. Bialostozky D, López-Meneses M, Crespo L, Lupi-Herrera E: Evaluación del dolor precordial en la Unidad de Emergencia. Papel de la Cardiología Nuclear. 2000. www.siicsalud.com.

  35. 31a. Wackers FJ, Sokole EB, Samson G, Schoot JB, Wellens HJ: Myocardial imaging in coronary heart disease with radionuclides, with emphasis on Thallium-201. Eur J Cardiol 1976; 4: 273-82.

  36. Bialostozky D, Várguez V, Ancona V, Casanova JM Rovaletti F, Pozas G, et al: Right Ventricle ischemia/infarction in 105 patients with left inferior myocardial infarction. SPECT myocardial perfusion and Gated-SPECT. Trabajo en preparación.

  37. Pozas G, Bialostozky D, Victoria D, Alexanderson E: Defectos de perfusión del ventrículo derecho en presencia de infarto del miocardio posteroinferior del VI. Extracto Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1995; 65: 178.

  38. Pozas G: Defectos de perfusión del ventrículo derecho en presencia de infarto del miocardio postero-inferior. Tesis. UNAM. 1996.

  39. Gomez A, Bialostozky D, Zajarias A, Santos E, Palomar A, Martinez ML, Sandoval J: Right Ventricular ischemia in patients with Primary Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1137-42.

  40. Schulman DS: Assessment of the right ventricle with radionucleide techniques. J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 3: 253-64.

  41. Goldstein JA: Pathophysiology and Management of Right Heart Ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 841-53.

  42. Wilkinson K, Severance H: Identification of Chest Pain Patients Appropriate for an Emergency Department Observation Unit. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2001; 19: 35-66.

  43. Selker HP, Zalenski RJ, Antman EM: An evaluation of technologies for identifying acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. Executive summary of a National Heart Attack Alert Program Working Group report. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 29: 1-1.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com