medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2022, Number 05

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2022; 90 (05)

Factors associated with home birth in Peru: An analysis of the Demographic and Health Survey, 2019

Huapaya TJ, Santos RY, Moquillaza AV

Language: Spanish
References: 50
Page: 395-406
PDF size: 238.01 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the proportion and factors associated with home delivery in Peru.
Materials and Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, analytical and quantitative study carried out in clusters of households distributed in Departmental capitals, urban cities and rural settings in Peru. A secondary database from the 2019 Peruvian Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES) was used. This design was chosen because outcome (home delivery) and exposure (factors) were assessed simultaneously during data collection.
Results: Of the 18401 records analyzed, it was estimated that 5.39% (95%CI: 4.83- 6.03%) of women in Peru had home births; however, the proportion reached 19.59% (95%CI: 17.26-22.17%) in rural areas and 17.85% (95%CI: 15.21-20.84%) in the Peruvian jungle.
Conclusions: The proportion of home births in Peru during 2019 was 5.39%; likewise, determinants favoring the occurrence of home births were identified, such as residing in the Peruvian highlands or jungle, in a rural area, having less than six prenatal care, being poor or very poor, having studies or only having attained primary education and, finally, having 2 or 3 children.


REFERENCES

  1. Borges L, Sánchez R, Domínguez R, Pérez S. El parto humanizado como necesidad para la atención integral a la mujer. Rev Cubana Obstet y Ginecol 2018; 44 (3): 1-12. http:// scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138- 600X2018000300002

  2. Feeley C, Thomson G, Downe S. Understanding how midwives employed by the National Health Service facilitate women’s alternative birthing choices: Findings from a feminist pragmatist study. PLoS One 2020; 15 (11): e0242508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242508

  3. Birthrights. Human rights in maternity care. United Kingdom, 2017. https://birthrights.org.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2019/03/Human-rights-in-maternity-care-2019.pdf

  4. Denis W. Improving Maternity Services: Small is Beautiful- Lessons from a Birth Centre. 2006. https://doi. org/10.1201/9781315383156

  5. van Teijlingen E. A Critical analysis of the medical model as used in the study of pregnancy and childbirth. Sociol Res Online 2005; 10 (2): 63-77. https://doi.org/10.5153/ sro.1034

  6. Dodwell M, Newburn M. Normal birth as a measure of the quality of care. London, 2010. https://www.semanticscholar. org/paper/Normal-birth-as-a-measure-of-thequality- of-care-Newburn/662211981f03245bd1458b71a 4d5b68ab78a78dc

  7. Sánchez-Redondo M, Cernada M, Boix H, Espinosa M, González-Pacheco N, Martín A, et al. Home births: A growing phenomenon with potential risks. An Pediatr 2020; 93 (4): 266.e1-266.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. anpedi.2020.04.005

  8. Rodriguez-Garrido P, Goberna-Triclas J. (In)seguridad del parto en el domicilio: una revisión bibliográfica. Matronas profesión 2020; 21 (2): e37-46. http://diposit.ub.edu/ dspace/bitstream/2445/173292/1/705814.pdf

  9. Ministerio de Salud. Plan Nacional Concertado de Salud. Lima, Perú, 2007. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/ minsa/informes-publicaciones/353469-plan-nacionalconcertado- de-salud

  10. Johnson F, Padmadas S, Matthews Z. Are women deciding against home births in low and middle income countries? PLoS One 2013; 8 (6): e65527. https://dx.doi. org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065527

  11. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Recomendaciones de la OMS Cuidados durante el parto para una experiencia de parto positiva. Washington: 2019. https://www.who. int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-careguidelines/ es/

  12. Rodríguez-Garrido P, Goberna-Tricas J. Birth cultures: A qualitative approach to home birthing in Chile. PLoS One 2021; 16 (4): e0249224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0249224

  13. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar. Lima, Perú. 2018. https:// www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_ digitales/Est/Lib1656/index1.html

  14. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Perú: Indicadores de Resultados de los Programas Presupuestales, 2014-2019. Lima, Perú. 2020. https://proyectos. inei.gob.pe/endes/2019/ppr/Indicadores%20de%20 Resultados%20de%20los%20Programas%20Presupuestales_ ENDES_2014_2019.pdf

  15. Devkota B, Maskey J, Pandey A, Karki D, Godwin P, Gartoulla P, et al. Determinants of home delivery in Nepal - A disaggregated analysis of marginalised and non-marginalised women from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS One 2020; 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0228440

  16. Ministerio de Salud. Guías Nacionales de Atención Integral de la Salud Sexual y Reproductiva. Lima, Perú. 2004. http:// bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/dgsp/63_guiasnac.pdf

  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health Practice. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta, USA. https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dsepd/ss1978/ss1978.pdf

  18. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Ficha Técnica-Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar. Lima, Perú. 2019. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/ publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1211/pdf/Libro.pdf

  19. Chacaltana J. Medición de la pobreza: Métodos más utilizados y utilidad para la aplicación de políticas. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Lima, Perú. http:// proyectos.inei.gob.pe/web/biblioineipub/bancopub/Est/ Lib0074/CAP2-16.htm

  20. Hernández-Vásquez A, Chacón-Torrico H. Manipulación, análisis y visualización de datos de la Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar con el programa R. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2019; 36 (1): 128-33. http://www.scielo.org.pe/ scielo.php?pid=S1726-46342019000100019&script=sci_ abstract

  21. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Bases de datos: Microdatos. Lima, Perú. http://iinei.inei.gob.pe/ microdatos/

  22. Hernández-Vásquez A, Chacón-Torrico H, Vargas-Fernández R. Factors associated with home births in Peru 2015-2017: A cross-sectional population-based study. Heliyon 2021; 7 (3): e06344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021. e06344

  23. Collins J, Bowie D, Shannon G. A descriptive analysis of health practices, barriers to healthcare and the unmet need for cervical cancer screening in the Lower Napo River region of the Peruvian Amazon. Women’s Heal 2019; 15: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745506519890969

  24. Moscoso-Porras M, Fuhs A, Carbone A. Access barriers to medical facilities for people with physical disabilities: the case of Peru. Cad Saude Publica 2019; 35 (12): e00050417. https://www.scielo.br/j/csp/a/V6h9qYpMnF7JRHYD6GVzf 4s/?format=pdf&lang=en

  25. Gianella C, Pesantes M, Ugarte-Gil C, Moore D, Lema C. Vulnerable populations and the right to health: lessons from the Peruvian Amazon around tuberculosis control. Int J Equity Health 2019; 18 (28): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12939-019-0928-z

  26. Del Mastro I, Tejada-Llacsa P, Reinders S, Pérez R, Solís Y, Alva I, et al. Home birth preference, childbirth, and newborn care practices in rural Peruvian Amazon. PLoS One 2021; 16 (5): e0250702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0250702

  27. Ayenew A, Nigussie A, Zewdu B. Childbirth at home and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Public Heal 2021; 79 (1): 1-18. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00569-5

  28. Atukunda E, Mugyenyi G, Obua C, Musiimenta A, Najjuma J, Agaba E, et al. When Women Deliver at Home Without a Skilled Birth Attendant: A Qualitative Study on the Role of Health Care Systems in the Increasing Home Births Among Rural Women in Southwestern Uganda. Int J Womens Health 2020; 12 (1): 423-34. https://doi.org/10.2147/ IJWH.S248240

  29. Mayra K, Matthews Z, Padmadas S. Why do some health care providers disrespect and abuse women during childbirth in India? Women and Birth 2021; S1871-5192 (21): 00032-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.02.003

  30. dos Santos A, Brentani A, Fink G. Associations between neighborhood violence during pregnancy and birth outcomes: evidence from São Paulo’s Western Region Birth Cohort. BMC Public Health 2021; 21 (1): 865. https://doi. org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-40469/v2

  31. Ministerio de Salud. Norma Técnica de Salud: Atención Integral de Salud Materna. Lima, Perú. 2013. https:// docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2019/04/964549/rm_827- 2013-minsa.pdf

  32. Hong K, Hwang H, Han H, Chae J, Choi J, Jeong Y, et al. Perspectives on antenatal education associated with pregnancy outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Women and Birth 2021; 34 (3): 219-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. wombi.2020.04.002

  33. Shiferaw K, Mengiste B, Gobena T, Dheresa M. The effect of antenatal care on perinatal outcomes in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16 (1): e0245003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245003

  34. Křepelka P, Velebil P, Měchurová A, Straňák Z, Feyereisl J. Complications of planned home births in the Czech Republic between 2016-2017. Cent Eur J Public Health 2020; 28 (3): 230-6. https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a5641

  35. Descieux K, Kavasseri K, Scott K, Beth Parlier A. Why Women Choose Home Birth: A Narrative Review. MAHEC Online J Res 2017; 3 (2): 1-10. https://sys.mahec.net/media/onlinejournal/ why_women.pdf

  36. Declercq E, Stotland NE. Planned home birth. UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/planned-homebirth/ contributors

  37. Gurara M, Van Geertruyden J, Gutema B, Draulans V, Jacquemyn Y. Maternity waiting homes as component of birth preparedness and complication readiness for rural women in hard-to-reach areas in Ethiopia. Reprod Health 2021; 18 (27). https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral. com/articles/10.1186/s12978-021-01086-y

  38. Siyoum M, Astatkie A, Mekonnen S, Bekele G, Taye K, Tenaw Z, et al. Home birth and its determinants among antenatal care-booked women in public hospitals in Wolayta Zone, southern Ethiopia. PLoS One 2018; 13 (9): e0203609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203609

  39. Moshi F, Mbotwa C. Determinants for choice of home birth over health facility birth among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: an analysis of data from the 2015-16 Tanzania demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey . BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20 (1): 561. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03266-3

  40. Tessema Z, Tiruneh S. Spatio-temporal distribution and associated factors of home delivery in Ethiopia. Further multilevel and spatial analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health surveys 2005-2016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20 (1): 342. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020- 02986-w

  41. Budu E. Predictors of home births among rural women in Ghana: Analysis of data from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20 (1): 523. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03211-4

  42. Presidencia de la República. Decreto Legislativo N° 1164. Diario oficial “El Peruano”. Lima, Perú, 2013. https:// busquedas.elperuano.pe/normaslegales/decreto-legislativo- que-establece-disposiciones-para-la-exte-decretolegislativo- n-1164-1025182-4/

  43. Ikeako L, Onah H, Iloabachie G. Influence of formal maternal education on the use of maternity services in Enugu, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) 2006; 26 (1): 30-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610500364004

  44. Fekadu M, Regassa N. Skilled delivery care service utilization in Ethiopia: Analysis of rural-urban differentials based on national demographic and health survey (DHS) data. Afr Health Sci 2014; 14 (4): 974-84. https://doi.org/10.4314/ ahs.v14i4.29

  45. Adatara P, Strumpher J, Ricks E. Exploring the reasons why women prefer to give birth at home in rural northern Ghana: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20 (1): 500. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884- 020-03198-y

  46. Laza C. Factores relacionados con la preferencia de las mujeres de zonas rurales por la partera tradicional. Rev Cuba Salud Pública 2015; 41 (3): 487-96. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-34662015000300008

  47. Swain P, Singh P, Priyadarshini S. Determinants of home deliveries - Findings from India DLHS 4 analysis. J Fam Med Prim Care 2020; 9 (9): 4728. https://dx.doi. org/10.4103%2Fjfmpc.jfmpc_751_20

  48. Myhre E, Lukasse M, Reigstad M, Holmstedt V, Dahl B. A qualitative study of Norwegian first-time mothers’ information needs in pre-admission early labour. Midwifery. 2021; 100: 103016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103016

  49. Ngunyulu R, Mulaudzi F, Peu M. Traditional birth attendants’ experiences during the provision of post-natal care in Mopani district, Limpopo province of South Africa. Heal SA Gesondheid. 2020; 25: 1468. https://doi.org/10.4102/ hsag.v25i0.1468

  50. Hulsbergen M, Van der Kwaak A. The influence of quality and respectful care on the uptake of skilled birth attendance in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20 (1): 681. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03278-z




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com