medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar

ISSN 1561-3046 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Mil 2021; 50 (1)

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a patient with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm

Descalzo GY, Martínez RM, Amable DT, Martínez LL, Oliva RJC, Yanes SA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page:
PDF size: 176.39 Kb.


Key words:

aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ampuloma.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The abdominal aortic aneurysm is a disease that usually occurs asymptomatically, associated with high mortality when it ruptures. Risk factors associated with the natural history of this condition are described. The performance of endoscopic therapeutic procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, has been controversial; although it is not established as a contraindication, it presupposes a high risk.
Objective: To present a patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, with high surgical risk to perform an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Clinical case: A patient with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm and clinical suspicion of an ampuloma is presented. Endoscopic therapy was performed using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, with some variations in the procedure. Successful drainage of the main bile duct was achieved without complications.
Conclusions: The therapy carried out was an option, but with a very high risk.


REFERENCES

  1. Blum Gilbert N, LecuonaHuet NE, Mijango Wensceslao F, Olivares Cruz S, Muñoz Vinga RA, Ziga Martínez A. Algoritmo diagnóstico de AAA con laboratorio vascular no invasivo. 2019 [acceso: 21/02/2020]; 47(1):8-20. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revmexang/an-2019/an191b.pdf

  2. La Hoz C, Esteban García C, Reinares García L, Bellmunt Montoya S, Brea Hernando A, Fernández Heredero A, et al. Recomendaciones de la guía para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del aneurisma de aorta abdominal. Clin Invest Arterioscl. 2015[acceso: 24/02/2020]; 27(3):159-65. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arteri.2015.01.004

  3. Plain Pazos C, Gonzalez Lastre M, Clavero Ojeda Z. Aneurisma aórtico abdominal roto como causa de disociación electromecánica. Rev Medicentro Electrónica.2018 [acceso: 21/02/2020];22(1):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1029-30432018000100015

  4. Celso Ardengh J, Kemp R, Rios Lima-Filho E, Sebastião dos Santos J. Endoscopic papillectomy: The limits of the indication, technique and results. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015[acceso: 21/02/2020]; 7(10):987-94. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530332/

  5. Laza Revolt JJ, Linares Cánovas LB, Linares Montano A, Macías Romero LA, Armenteros Conill A. Caracterización de un grupo de pacientes con aneurisma de la aorta abdominal. Univ Méd Pinareña. 2019 [acceso: 05/03/2020];15(1):38-47. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=86383

  6. Zúñiga Reyes A, Rojas Mazaira L, Vilalta Alonso G, Montesinos Otero ME, Pinto Ortiz J, Rodríguez Madrigal M, et al. Evaluación del riesgo de ruptura de aneurismas de aorta abdominal personalizados mediante factores biomecánicos. Ingeniería Mecánica. 2014 [acceso 21/02/2020]; 17(2):157-67. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1815-59442014000200007

  7. Salvador González B, Martín Baranera M, Borque Ortega A, Sáez-Sáez RM, de Albert Delas Vigo M, Carreño García E, et al. Prevalence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Men Aged 65 - 74 Years in a Metropolitan Area in North-East Spain. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016[acceso: 21/02/2020]; 52:75-81. Disponible en: https://www.ejves.com/article/S1078-5884(16)30039-9/pdf

  8. Chiang N, Jain JK, Hulme KR, Vasudevan T. Epidemiology and Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in New Zealand: A 15-year Experience at a Reginal Hospital. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017[acceso: 21/02/2020];46:274-84. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28739467

  9. Schermerhorn ML, Buck DB, O'Malley AK, Curran T, McCallum JC, Darling J, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Medical Population. N Engl J Med. 2015[acceso: 21/02/2020]; 373(4):328-38. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26200979

  10. Vilalta G, Nieto F, Vaquero C. Quantitative indicator of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk based on its geometric parameters. International Journal of Medical, Health, Biomedical, Bioengineering and Pharmaceutical Engineering. 2010[acceso: 11/11/2019]; 4:181-5. Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.190.7575&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  11. Kanamori A, Kiriyama S, Tanitawa M, Hisanaga Y, Toyoda H, Tada T, et al. Long and short term autcomes of ERCP for bile duct stones in patients over 80 years old compared to younger patients: a propenssity score analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2016[acceso: 11/11/2019];4(1):83-90. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4713177/

  12. Ukkonen M, Siiki A, Antila A, Tyrvainen T. Safety and efficacy of acute endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatic in the elderly. Digestive disease and science. 2016[acceso: 01/03/2020]; 61:3302-8. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4283-2

  13. Guidi M, Hwang HJ, Curvale C, Souto G, Ragone JM, Promenzio E, Matano R. Calidad y competencia en colangiografía endoscópica. Rumbo a lo seguro. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2015[acceso: 11/11/2019]; 45(1):37-45. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1993/199336842010.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Med Mil . 2021;50