medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2021; 34 (1)

Comparison of biometric measurements taken with IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL for ocular biometry

Cárdenas DT, Montero DE, Muñoz EM, Sotolongo BY, Rodríguez CY

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-13
PDF size: 351.06 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: Compare biometric measurements taken with IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted of 99 eyes of 99 myopic patients with indication of photoablative surgery attending the Refractive Surgery Service at Ramón Pando Ferrer Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from January 2019 to January 2020. The variables analyzed were age, sex, spherical equivalent and preoperative biometric characteristics (axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometries) and the relationship to one another, automatically supplied by IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL to avoid operator-dependent factors. Statistical analysis was based on the paired T-test with a significance level of 95%. A difference with a p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results: Of the patients studied, 60.61% were female and 39.39% were male; mean age was 25.67± 4.30 years. A total 51 right eyes and 48 left eyes were analyzed. Mean spherical equivalent was -3.30 ± 1.53 diopters. No statistically significant difference was found between the biometric values (axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometries) obtained with IOL Master 500 versus Pentacam AXL (p> 0.05).
Conclusion: Similar biometric measurements (axial length, anterior chamber depth and keratometries) are obtained with IOL Master 500 and Pentacam AXL.


REFERENCES

  1. Wegener A, Laser-Junga H. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cat Refr Surg. 2016;42(1):50-61.

  2. Shammas HJ, Hoffer KJ. Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(1):55-61.

  3. Ventura BV, Ventura MC, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer. J Cat Refr Surg. 2017;43(1):74-9. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.033

  4. Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, Haigis W, Sekundo W, Schütze J, Büehren T. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cat Refr Surg. 2016;42(1):76-83.

  5. AKMan A, Asena L, Güngör SG. Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(9):1201-5.

  6. Kurian M, Negalur N, Das S, Puttaiah NK, Haria D, Thakkar MM. Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: Repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device. J Cat Refr Surg. 2016;42(4):577-81.

  7. Pereira JMM, Neves A, Alfaiate P, Santos M, Aragao H, Sousa JC. Lenstar (R)- LS 900 vs. Pentacam (R)- AXL: comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28(6):645-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/112067211877184

  8. Cárdenas T, Machado E, Guerra M. Cirugía refractiva corneal. En: Ríos M, Fernández L, Hernández JR, Ramos M. Oftalmología. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. La Habana: Ciencias Médicas; 2018. p. 89-93.

  9. DI Ruggiero M. Declaración de Helsinki, principios y valores bioéticos en juego en la investigación médica con seres humanos. Rev Colomb Bioét. 2011;6(1):125-44.

  10. Calvo Sanz JA. Método de cálculo de potencia de lentes intraoculares con manejo del astigmatismo corneal: validación del método bicilíndrico. Madrid: Tesis Doctoral. 2018 [acceso: 11/05/2020]. Disponible en: https://eprints.ucm.es/55796/1/T41170.pdf

  11. Saucedo-Urdapilleta R. Estudio comparativo entre los biómetros ópticos IOL Master 500 versus IOL Master 700 en pacientes con catarata y análisis de repetibilidad. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2019;93(3):130-6.

  12. Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cat Refr Surg. 2015;41(10):2224-32.

  13. Dong J, Tang M, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of anterior segment biometric measurements between Pentacam HR and IOLMaster in normal and high myopic eyes. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):0143110. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143110

  14. Sel S, Stange J, Kaiser D, Kiraly L. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017;40 (5):318-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.03.007

  15. Shajari M, Cremonese C, Petermann K, Singh P, Muller M, Kohnen T. Comparison of axial length, corneal curvature, and anterior chamber depth measurements of 2 recently introduced devices to a known biometer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:58-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.027

  16. Wang ZY. Comparison of biometry with the Pentacam AXL, IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 in cataract patients. Chin J Ophthalmol. 2019;55(7):515-521. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.07.007

  17. Haddad JS. Comparison of Biometry Measurements Using Standard Partial Coherence Interferometry versus New Scheimpflug Tomography with Integrated Axial Length Capability. J Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:353-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238112

  18. Fau C, Nabzo s, Nasabun V. ¿Selección de ojos o pacientes? Trampa estadística. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2020;94(1):53-4.

  19. Cárdenas T, Monteagudo K, Guerra M, Cruz D, Mariño O. Lentes fáquicas para la corrección de ametropías. Antecedentes y actualidad. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019 [acceso: 11/05/2020];31(2). Disponible en: http://www.revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/609

  20. Cárdenas Díaz T. Resultados visuales en la corrección de la alta miopía con implante de lente fáquica ACR-128. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019 [acceso: 11/05/2020];3(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762019000200003&lng=es. Epub 15-Sep-2019

  21. Cárdenas Díaz T. Efecto de la lente fáquica ACR-128 sobre la tensión ocular y el endotelio corneal en las altas miopías. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019;32(2):e612 [acceso: 11/05/2020]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762019000200005&lng=es




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com