medigraphic.com
Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2022; 82 (3)

Role of laparoscopy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: LATAM experience

Silva-Araujo HD, Barreto-Gutiérrez M, Flores-Fernández OC, Rodríguez-Fernández MV

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page:
PDF size: 147.87 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objectives: research what is the actual role of the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, in daily practice of Latin American urologists.
Materials and methods: an online survey was conducted during the period June - September 202, send to all members of the Confederación Americana de Urología, through its official networks.
Results: laparoscopic adenomectomy is not the preferred approach for the treatment of prostates larger than 100g (4% vs 76% for open adenomectomy), most respondents never performed this technique (76%), however, urologists recognize that the laparoscopic approach has benefits over the open approach (64%).
Conclusions: although the laparoscopic approach has shown clear benefits in terms of surgical morbidity compared to the open approach, for most Latin American urologists, the technique has not yet been implemented in routine daily practice, being an unknown technique for most of respondents.


REFERENCES

  1. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA.Campbell-Walsh Urology 12th Edition Review.Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. 624 p.

  2. Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV.Laparoscopic Prostatectomy With VascularControl for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Journal of Urology. 2002 Jun 1;167(6):2528–9.doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65025-2

  3. van Velthoven R, Peltier A, Laguna MP,Piechaud T. Laparoscopic extraperitonealadenomectomy (Millin): pilot study onfeasibility. Eur Urol. 2004 Jan;45(1):103–9;discussion 109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2003.07.002

  4. Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, Garcia A,Banda E, Miranda M, et al. Robotic simpleprostatectomy. J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):513–5.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.065

  5. Porpiglia F, Checcucci E, Amparore D,Niculescu G, Volpi G, Piramide F, et al.Urethral-sparing Robot-assisted SimpleProstatectomy: An Innovative Technique toPreserve Ejaculatory Function Overcoming theLimitation of the Standard Millin Approach. EurUrol. 2021 Aug;80(2):222–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.028

  6. Garcia-Segui A, Angulo JC. Estudioprospectivo comparativo entre adenomectomíalaparoscópica y abierta: resultados operatoriosy funcionales. Actas Urológicas Españolas.2017 Jan 1;41(1):47–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2016.04.008

  7. Lusuardi L, Hruby S, Janetschek G, MitterbergerM, Sieberer M, Colleselli D, et al. Laparoscopicadenomectomy versus Eraser laser enucleationof the prostate. World J Urol. 2015 May1;33(5):691–6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1476-1

  8. Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, Sanchez-Salas R, Sotelo RJ, Chlosta PL, et al. PerioperativeOutcomes of Robotic and LaparoscopicSimple Prostatectomy: A European-AmericanMulti-institutional Analysis. Eur Urol. 2015Jul;68(1):86–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.044

  9. Garcia-Segui A, Verges A, Galán-Llopis JA,Garcia-Tello A, Ramón de Fata F, Angulo JC.Adenomectomía laparoscópica extraperitoneal«sin nudos». Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Mar1;39(2):128–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2014.05.011

  10. Castillo C O, Degiovani M D, Sánchez-SalasR, Vidal M I, Vitagliano G, Díaz C M, etal. Prostatectomía simple (adenomectomía)laparoscópica. Revista chilena de cirugía.2008 Oct;60(5):387–92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-40262008000500004

  11. Zhou L-Y, Xiao J, Chen H, Zhu Y-P, Sun Y-W,Xuan Q. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomyfor benign prostatic hyperplasia.World J Urol. 2009 Jun;27(3):385–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0359-8

  12. Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, KlatteT. Outcomes of minimally invasive simpleprostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia:a systematic review and meta-analysis. WorldJ Urol. 2015 Apr 1;33(4):563–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1324-3

  13. Pavan N, Zargar H, Sanchez-Salas R, CastilloO, Celia A, Gallo G, et al. Robot-assistedVersus Standard Laparoscopy for SimpleProstatectomy: Multicenter ComparativeOutcomes. Urology. 2016 May;91:104–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.032

  14. Xie J, Tan Y, Wang F, Xuan Q, Sun Y, Xiao J, etal. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic adenomectomy(Madigan) versus bipolar transurethralresection of the prostate for benign prostatichyperplasia greater than 80 ml: complicationsand functional outcomes after 3-year follow-up.J Endourol. 2014 Mar;28(3):353–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0374




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com