Ortega PJA, Núñez PD, Díaz AO, Méndez FL

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page:
PDF size: 134.67 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Surgery, as a medical science, faced big challenges to become a form of a safe, feasible surgical treatment; among them, one of the biggest was avoiding adverse outcomes. The authors carried out an analysis of the patients readmitted in the service of General Surgery of the University Hospital “Faustino Perez Hernandez” of Matanzas due to complicated post-surgery evolution in the period from January 2016 to December 2018. Objective: to determine the causes of readmissions due to complicated post-surgery evolution in the service of General Surgery of the University “Hospital Faustino Perez Hernandez”. Materials and methods: a prospective, descriptive, observational study was carried out on a universe of all patients readmitted in the service of General Surgery due to complicated post-surgery evolution. The authors analyzed several variables that could be related to readmissions and were obtained from a data collection form and processed with the computer program Microsoft Office 2009. Results: the main results were that among readmitted patients, the highest percent were male, white and elder than 60 years old. Readmissions due to post-surgery complications represent a low percent with respect to the quantity of patients who underwent surgery, and the main cause of readmission was infection at the surgery site. From the analyzed variables the once related the most with readmissions were conventional surgeries, patients looked after in open wards, with contaminated clean operations. Conclusions: six from each ten patients were male, white, and aged more than 60 years.

REFERENCES

1. Kassin MT, Owen RM, Pérez SD, et al. Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission among general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 215(3):322-30.Citado en PubMed;PMID:22726893.

2. Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 ; 14(4):269-76.Citado en PubMed ;PMID: 12201185.

3. Safran C, Phillips RS. Interventions to prevent readmission. The constraints of cost and efficacy. Med Care. 1989 ; 27(2):204-11.Citado en PubMed;PMID: 2493114.

4. Thomas JW, Holloway JJ. Investigating early readmission as an indicator for quality of care studies. Med Care. 1991 ; 29(4):377-94. Citado en PubMed ;PMID: 1902276.

5. Welch HG, Larson EH. Patients requiring at least five admissions in 1 year. Data from Washington State. Med Care. 1991 ; 29(6):578-82. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 1904519.

6. Schoell K, Buser Z, Jakoi A, et al. Postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion. Spine J. 2016 ; 16(11):1324-32. Citado en PubMed ;PMID: 27349627.

7. Esmail N, Buser Z, Cohen JR, et al. Postoperative Complications Associated With rhBMP2 Use in Posterior/Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion. Global Spine J. 2018 ;8(2):142-148.Citado en PubMed;PMID: 29662744.

8. Ojeda Ramos RF. Ondansetrón vs Dexametasona para la prevención de nausea y vómito postoperatorios [Internet]. México: Universidad Veracruzana[citado 18/06/2019]; 2013. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.uv.mx/favem/files/2013/01/TESIS-RUBEN-FERNANDO-OJEDA-RAMOS.pdf

9. Castañeda Mercado IC, Mariño Salazar AM, Reátegui Wong A. Características clínicas y quirúrgicas de los pacientes sometidos a colecistectomía laparoscópica ambulatoria en el Hospital Cayetano Heredia 2014 -2016[Internet].Perú: Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia [citado 18/06/2019]; 2019. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://repositorio.upch.edu.pe/handle/upch/6382

10. Cano-Valderrama O, Hernández G, Soto-Sánchez A, et al. Implementación de un programa de cirugía proctológica en régimen de cirugía mayor ambulatoria: experiencia inicial. Rev Chil Cir [Internet]. 2017 [citado 22/07/2020] ;69(2): 151-56. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-40262017000200011&script=sci_arttext&tlng=e

11. Miranda IB, Zamorano Díaz M, Martínez Riveros G, et al. LXXXVIII Congreso chileno e internacional de cirugía. Jornadas de cirugía vascular y endovascular[Internet]. Chile: Sociedad coloproctología[citado 18/06/2019]; 2015. Disponible en Disponible en http://www.sociedadcoloproctologiachile.cl/

12. Kotze PG, Mckenna N, Almutairdi A, et al. Vedolizumab and early postoperative complications in nonintestinal surgery: a case-matched analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Citado en PubMed;PMID: 29977340.

13. Bannura CG, Barrera EA, Melo LC, et al. Alternativas quirúrgicas en el manejo de la fístula rectovaginal: experiencia de 25 años. Rev Chil Cir [Internet]. 2017 [citado 22/07/2020] ; 69(2):144-150. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-40262017000200010&lng=es

14. Armiñanzas C, Tigera T, Ferrer D, et al. Role of bacteriobilia in postoperative complications. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2016 ;29(3):123-9.Citado en PubMed ;PMID: 27062981.

15. León J, Acevedo A, Rioseco D, et al. Complicaciones postoperatorias en la herniorrafia ambulatoria con malla: Estudio comparativo de la tasa de infección del sitio operatorio con y sin profilaxis antibiótica. Rev Chil Cir [Internet]. 2011 [citado 22/07/2020]; 63(2): 186-90. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0718-40262011000200009&script=sci_arttext&tlng=e

16. Scarano KA, Philp FH, et al. Evaluating Postoperative Complications and Outcomes of Orthopedic Fracture Repair in Nonagenarian Patients. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018.Citado en PubMed;PMID:29619274.

17. Ambrus R, Svendsen LB, Secher NH, et al. Severe Postoperative Complications may be Related to Mesenteric Traction Syndrome during Open Esophagectomy. Scand J Surg. 2017;106(3):241-248. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 28737104.