medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa REVMEDUAS

ISSN 2007-8013 (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med UAS 2021; 11 (3)

Utility of the measurement of hand strength as a screening of disease-associated malnutrition in hospitalized patients

Contreras-Sánchez S, Aguilar-Ide BP, Dehesa-López E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 189-197
PDF size: 94.29 Kb.


Key words:

Malnutrition, Hand strength, Bioimpedance.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the diagnostic performance of the Hand Strength (HS) for the diagnosis of Disease-Related Malnutrition (DAM) in hospitalized patients. Material and methods: Cross-sectional study. We studied 86 adult patients (68.6% male) hospitalized with an average age of 59 ± 18 years. At the admission, the risk of malnutrition was evaluated with the NRS2002 questionnaire, we measured the bioelectrical impedance and the HS in the dominant hand. The sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and accuracy of the HS for the diagnosis of DAM were calculated with contingency tables, using the bioelectric impedance vector as the gold standard for the diagnosis of DAM. Results: According to VIBE, 24.4% (n = 21) had a diagnosis of DAM at admission. The body composition evaluated by bioimpedance between patients with and without malnutrition, evidenced that the malnourished patients had lower Fat-Free Body Index (FFBI) (15.9 ± 2.2 vs. 20.3±2.7; p = ‹ 0.01), Kg / muscle (42.63±6.70 vs 57.46±42.63; p = ‹ 0.01) and Body Mass Index (BMI) (21.7±5.7 vs. 27.6±5.5; p = ‹ 0.01) compared to patients without malnutrition. According to nutritional status, HGS was lower in patients with DAM (14.9 ± 9.6 vs. 21.6 ± 10.3; p = 0.01). The results for the 50th percentile (p50) of the HS was: 100% sensitivity, 21% specificity, 25% PPV, 100% NPV and 26.7% accuracy. Conclusions: HGS can be an accessible, non-invasive, inexpensive and easily applied tool for screening DAM in hospitalized patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Kondrup J, Johansen N, Plum LM, Bak L,Larsen IH, Martinsen A, et al. Incidence ofnutritional risk and causes of inadequate nutritionalcare in hospitals. Clin Nutr. 2002Dec;21(6):461-8.

  2. Norman K, Pichard C, Lochs H, Pirlich M.Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition.Clin Nutr. 2008 Feb;27(1):5-15.

  3. Elia M, Zellipour L, Stratton RJ. To screen ornot to screen for adult malnutrition? ClinNutr. 2005 Dec;24(6):867-84

  4. Rodríguez GW, García CL, Orea TA, MendozaNV, González ID, Santillán DC, et al.Handgrip strength: Reference values and itsrelationship with bioimpedance and anthropometricvariables. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2017Jun 1; 19:54–8.

  5. Jensen GL. Inflammation as the key interfaceof the medical and nutrition universes:a provocative examination of the future of clinicalnutrition and medicine. JPEN J ParenterEnteral Nutr. 2006 Sep-Oct;30(5):453-63

  6. Jensen GL, Mirtallo J, Compher C, DhaliwalR, Forbes A, Grijalba RF, et al; InternationalConsensus Guideline Committee. Adult starvationand disease-related malnutrition: aproposal for etiology-based diagnosis in theclinical practice setting from the InternationalConsensus Guideline Committee. JPEN JParenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Mar-Apr;34(2):156-9

  7. White JV, Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A,Schofield M; Academy Malnutrition WorkGroup; A.S.P.E.N. Malnutrition Task Force;A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors. Consensusstatement: Academy of Nutrition and Dieteticsand American Society for Parenteral andEnteral Nutrition: characteristics recommendedfor the identification and documentationof adult malnutrition (undernutrition). JPEN JParenter Enteral Nutr. 2012 May;36(3):275-

  8. Cederholm T, Bosaeus I, Barazzoni R,Bauer J, Van Gossum A, Klek S, et al. Diagnosticcriteria for malnutrition - An ESPENConsensus Statement. Clin Nutr. 2015Jun;34(3):335-40

  9. Norman K, Stobäus N, Gonzalez MC, SchulzkeJ-D, Pirlich M. Hand grip strength: Outcomepredictor and marker of nutritional status.Clin Nutr. 2011;30(2):135–42.

  10. Jensen GL, Mirtallo J, Compher C, DhaliwalR, Forbes A, Grijalba RF, et al; InternationalConsensus Guideline Committee. Adult starvationand disease-related malnutrition: aproposal for etiology-based diagnosis in theclinical practice setting from the InternationalConsensus Guideline Committee. JPEN JParenter Enteral Nutr. 2010 Mar-Apr;34(2):156-9

  11. Matos LC, Tavares MM, Amaral TF. Handgripstrength as a hospital admission nutritionalrisk screening method. Eur J Clin Nutr.2007 Sep;61(9):1128-35

  12. Espinosa CM, Rivas RL, González ME, AtilanoCX, Miranda AP, Correa RR. Vectoresde impedancia bioeléctrica para la composicióncorporal en población mexicana. RevInvest Clin 2007; 59 (1): 15- 24




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med UAS. 2021;11