Parra-Medina LE

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 52-55
PDF size: 234.50 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Kandel E. The new science of mind and the future ofknowledge. Neuron. 2013; 80(3): 546-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.039

2. Pandya SK. Understanding brain, mind and soul: contributionsfrom neurology and neurosurgery. Mens Sana Monogr. 2011;9(1): 129-49. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.77431

3. Santoro G, Wood MD, Merlo L, Anastasi GP, Tomasello F, GermanòA. The anatomic location of the soul from the heart, throughthe brain, to the whole body, and beyond: a journey throughWestern history, science, and philosophy. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(4): 633-43. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000349750.22332.6A

4. López-Muñoz F, Rubio G, Molina J, Alamo C. The pineal glandas physical tool of the soul faculties: a persistent historicalconnection. Neurología. 2012; 27: 161-68. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2011.04.018

5. Wragge-Morley A. Imagining the soul: Thomas Willis (1621-1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves. Prog Brain Res.2018;243: 55-73. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.009

6. Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR. Cognitive neuroscience:The biology of the mind.4th ed. New York: W.W. Norton &Company; 2019.

7. Gazzaniga MS, Bogen JE, Sperry RW. Observations on visualperception after disconnexion of the cerebral hemispheres in man.Brain. 1965 Jun;88(2): 221-36. doi: 10.1093/brain/88.2.221

8. Elhadi AM, Kalb S, Perez-Orribo L, Little AS, Spetzler RF, PreulMC. The journey of discovering skull base anatomy in ancientEgypt and the special influence of Alexandria. Neurosurg Focus.2012 ;33(2): E2. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.FOCUS12128

9. York GK 3rd, Steinberg DA. Chapter 3: neurology in ancientEgypt. Handb Clin Neurol. 2010;95: 29-36. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(08)02103-9

10. Saleh MKM, Masoud MA, Ibrahim HS, Elmahdy EM. The Seatsof the Deities in the Tombs of the Valley of the Kings. Journal ofthe Faculty of Tourism and Hotels-University of Sadat City. 2018Jun;2(1): 112-26. doi: 10.21608/MFTH.2018.26254

11. Escobar A. Santiago Ramón y Cajal, premio Nobel 1906. RevMex Neuroci. 2006;7: 414-17.

12. Vincent JD. El cerebro explicado a mi nieto. 1a ed. Barcelona: Paidós; 2017.

13. Harris AR, McGivern P, Ooi L. Modeling Emergent Properties in the Brain Using Tissue Models to Investigate Neurodegenerative Disease.Neuroscientist. 2020; 26(3): 224-30. doi: 10.1177/1073858419870446

14. Kandel ER. En busca de la memoria: El nacimiento de una nueva ciencia de la mente. 1a ed. Buenos Aires: Katz Editores; 2007.

15. Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Ome sweet ome: what can the genome tell us about the connectome? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Jun;18(3):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.010

16. Pertea M, Salzberg SL. Between a chicken and a grape: estimating the number of human genes. Genome Biol. 2010;11(5): 206. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-206

17. Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TE, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K, et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview.Neuroimage. 2013 Oct;80: 62-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041

18. Collins FS, Mansoura MK. The Human Genome Project. Revealing the shared inheritance of all humankind. Cancer. 2001; 91: 221-5.doi: 10.1002/1097-0142.

19. Macdonald K, Germine L, Anderson A, Christodoulou J, McGrath LM. Dispelling the Myth: Training in Education or NeuroscienceDecreases but Does Not Eliminate Beliefs in Neuromyths. Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 1314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01314.

20. Howard-Jones PA. Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 15(12): 817-24. doi: 10.1038/nrn3817.

21. Varas-Genestier P, Ferreira RA. Neuromitos de los profesores chilenos: orígenes y predictores. Estud pedagóg Valdivia. 2017;43(3):341-60.

22. Nielsen JA, Zielinski BA, Ferguson MA, Lainhart JE, Anderson JS. An evaluation of the left-brain vs. right-brain hypothesis with resting statefunctional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8): e71275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071275.