Rodríguez-Artavia A

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 117-124
PDF size: 185.32 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The present work is directed to the analysis and reflection of the effects of the strategies adopted by Latin American countries in the formulation of public policies that allow to record and perpetuate different actions from the construct of nation that each country has tried to reach. To do so, taking into account different documents and reports presented by organizations such as CEPAL, the World Bank, the United Nations, among others, the question arises as to how, from the results obtained for the different indicators, policies emanating from Latin American countries project a panorama that it moves away from the positive visualization and construction of the concept of peace (balance and stability of unity). To this end, it is offered as a means and alternative of repositioning, the linking of bioethical reflection to the construction of the political approach, this as a mechanism that links the needs presented from the country indicators with the proposals for change and improvement that from the political actions must be submitted. It is concluded that as long as the distance between the (bio) ethical reflection and the actions that from the public policy must be routed in the different areas, it is complex to change the present Latin American and country reality toward the broad conception of the concept of peace that from their balance and inner stability achieve non-violence or war with each other.

REFERENCES

1. BANCO MUNDIAL. (2017). Índice de Gini. Material [EnLínea] [Fecha de consulta 07 de junio de 2017]. Disponibleen: https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/SI.POV.GINI?end=2014&locations=AR-BZ-BO&start=2010

2. COMISIÓN ECONÓMICA PARA AMÉRICA LATINAY EL CARIBE (CEPAL). (2017). Panorama social deAmérica Latina 2016. Material [En Línea] [Fecha deconsulta 12 de junio de 2017]. Disponible en:http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/41598-panoramasocial-america-latina-2016-documento-informativo

3. GALTUNG, J. (2003). Violencia Cultural. España:Guernika-Lumo-Gernika Gogoratuz.

4. GARRAFA, V; MANCHOLA, C. (2014). La bioética:una herramienta para la construcción de la paz.Revista Colombiana de Bioética. Vol. 9, (2), 95-106.Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.

5. FISAS ARMENGOL, V. (1987). Introducción al estudiode la paz y de los conflictos. Barcelona: Lerna.

6. ORGANIZACIÓN DE LA NACIONES UNIDAS PARALA EDUCACIÓN CIENCIA Y CULTURA (UNESCO).(2005). Declaración universal sobre Bioética y DerechosHumanos. Material [En Línea] [Fecha deconsulta 18 de junio de 2017]. Disponible en: http://portal.unesco.org/es/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

7. ORGANIZACIÓN INTERNACIONAL DEL TRABAJO(OIT). (2016). Panorama laboral 2016 América Latinay el Caribe. Material [En Línea] [Fecha de consulta18 de junio de 2017]. Disponible en:http://www.ilo.org/americas/publicaciones/panorama-laboral/WCMS_537803/lang--pt/index.htm

8. PORTER, M; STERN, S. (2017). Índice de progresosocial 2017. Material [En Línea] [Fecha de consulta02 de julio de 2017]. Disponible en: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/pe/Documents/about-deloitte/Social-Progress-Index-2017-Resultados-completo.pdf

9. PROGRAMA DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA ELDESARROLLO (PNUD). (2016). Panorama general,Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2016, Desarrollo humanopara todos. Material [En Línea] [Fecha de consulta07 de junio de 2017]. Disponible en: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/HDR2016_SP_Overview_Web.pdf

10. PROGRAMA DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS PARA ELDESARROLLO (PNUD). (2015). Panorama general,Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2016, Desarrollohumano para todos. Material [En Línea] [Fecha deconsulta 02 de julio de 2017]. Disponible en: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report_overview_-_es.pdf