medigraphic.com
SPANISH

CorSalud (Revista de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares)

ISSN 2078-7170 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

CorSalud 2021; 13 (2)

Evolution of patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema treated with non-invasive ventilation in the emergency department

Navarro RZ, Romero GLI, Torres MJM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 150-154
PDF size: 249.34 Kb.


Key words:

mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, acute pulmonary edema, cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Acute pulmonary edema is frequently treated in emergency departments and non-invasive ventilation is a new modality of ventilatory support used in its treatment.
Objective: To describe the variations in clinical, ventilatory and hemogasometric parameters in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema treated with noninvasive ventilation.
Method: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out on 54 patients with acute pulmonary edema admitted to the Emergency Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital Provincial Saturnino Lora, in the city of Santiago de Cuba, from January 2019 to January 2020.
Results: Males (70.4% of patients) prevailed and mean age was 62 years old. The applied technique was successful in 90.7% of patients. After one hour of treatment there was an improvement in all clinical and hemogasometric parameters, except in sodium bicarbonate. Higher PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) values were required in patients where the technique failed and the frequency of the technique application was higher in patients where it was successful.
Conclusions: Patients with acute pulmonary edema, treated with non-invasive ventilation, evolved favorably with improvement in clinical, ventilatory and hemogasometric parameters.


REFERENCES

  1. Masip J, Peacock WF, Price S, Cullen L, MartinSanchez FJ, Seferovic P, et al. Indications andpractical approach to non-invasive ventilation inacute heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(1):17-25. [DOI]

  2. Esquinas AM, Benhamou MO, Glossop AJ, MinaB. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acuteventilatory failure: Rationale and Current Applications. Sleep Med Clin. 2017;12(4):597-606. [DOI]

  3. Marino PL. Acute Heart Failure in the ICU. En:Marino’s, The ICU Book. 4ª Ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 239-62.

  4. Barach AL, Martin J, Eckman M. Positive pressurerespiration and its application to the treatment ofacute pulmonary edema. Ann Int Med. 1938;12(6):754-95. [DOI]

  5. Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, HillNS, Nava S, et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acuterespiratory failure. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2017[citado 14 Ene 2020];50(2):1602426. Disponible en:https://doi. org/10. 1183/13993003. 02426-2016

  6. Liesching T, Nelson DL, Cormier KL, Sucov A,Short K, Warburton R, et al. Randomized trial ofbilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure for acute pulmonary edema. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(1):130-40. [DOI]

  7. Gray A, Goodacre S, Newby DE, Masson M, Sampson F, Nicholl J, et al. Noninvasive ventilation inacute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. N Engl JMed. 2008;359(2):142-51. [DOI]

  8. Peter JV, Moran JL, Phillips-Hughes J, Graham P,Bersten AD. Effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on mortality in patientswith acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367(9517):1155-63. [DOI]

  9. Masip J, Roque M, Sánchez B, Fernández R, Subirana M, Expósito JA. Noninvasive ventilation inacute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: systematicreview and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;294(24):3124-30. [DOI]

  10. Weng CL, Zhao YT, Liu QH, Fu CJ, Sun F, Ma YL,et al. Meta-analysis: Noninvasive ventilation inacute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Ann InternMed. 2010;152(9):590-600. [DOI]

  11. Masip J, Betbesé AJ, Páez J, Vecilla F, CañizaresR, Padró J, et al. Non-invasive pressure supportventilation versus conventional oxygen therapyin acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9248):2126-32. [DOI]

  12. Park M, Sangean MC, Volpe M de S, Feltrim MI,Nozawa E, Leite PF, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of oxygen, continuous positive airwaypressure, and bilevel positive airway pressure byface mask in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(12):2407-15. [DOI]

  13. Winck JC, Azevedo LF, Costa-Pereira A, AntonelliM, Wyatt JC. Efficacy and safety of non-invasiveventilation in the treatment of acute cardiogenicpulmonary edema – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care [Internet]. 2006 [citado 20Ene 2020];10(2):R69. Disponible en:https://doi. org/10. 1186/cc4905

  14. Collins SP, Mielniczuk LM, Whittingham HA,Boseley ME, Schramm DR, Storrow AB. The useof noninvasive ventilation in emergency department patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonaryedema: A systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48(3):260-9. [DOI]

  15. Mehta S, Al-Hashim AH, Keenan SP. Noninvasiveventilation in patients with acute cardiogenicpulmonary edema. Respir Care. 2009;54(2):186-95.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

CorSalud. 2021;13