Rojas-Padilla SV, Ríos-Caro TE

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 538.85 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In children's dental care it is crucial to select restorative materials of proven clinical quality and a short application period, particularly with patients of limited attention capacity. Due to their improved physical and mechanical properties, composite resins are currently one of the materials of choice for children's dental care. Bulk fill resins are an attractive alternative for posterior restorations.
Objective: Compare the degree of marginal microleakage of bulk fill and nanohybrid resins in deciduous teeth.
Methods: An experimental in vitro study was conducted of 40 deciduous teeth extracted for therapeutic reasons, which were divided into two groups. Group I: nanohybrid resin by incremental technique (Tetric® N Ceram - Ivoclar Vivadent) and Group II: bulk fill resin by monoincremental technique (Tetric® N Ceram bulk fill - Ivoclar Vivadent). A manual 500-cycle thermocycling procedure was performed at 5ºC ± 2ºC to 55ºC ± 2ºC. The samples were soaked in 0.5% methylene blue at 37ºC for 24 hours and analyzed under a light stereo microscope at 40X.
Results: Microleakage was present in all the samples. In the nanohybrid resin group, microleakage was mild in 25%, moderate in 30% and severe in 45%. In the bulk fill resin group, microleakage was mild in 30%, moderate in 35% and severe in 35%. No significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.55).
Conclusions: Both resins, bulk fill and nanohybrid, presented similar in vitro marginal microleakage in deciduous molars. The bulk fill technique is therefore a good alternative for children's dental rehabilitation, due to its easy and fast application in a single session.

REFERENCES

1. Lenzi TL, Gimenez T, Tedesco TK, Mendes FM, Rocha RO, Raggio DP. Adhesive systems for restoring primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2016 [acceso: 18/12/2019];26(5). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ipd.12210

2. Sabel N, Robertson A, Nietzsche S, Norén JG. Demineralization of Enamel in primary second molars related to properties of the Enamel. Sci. World J. 2012 [acceso: 20/12/2019]; 2012. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/587254/

3. Gentile E, Di Stasio D, Santoro R, Contaldo M, Salerno C, Serpico R, et al. In Vivo Microstructural Analysis of Enamel in Permanent and Deciduous Teeth. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2015 [acceso: 20/12/2019]; 39(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/01913123.2014.960544?needAccess=true&journalCode=iusp20

4. Kidd E. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976 [acceso: 18/12/2019]; 4(5). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0300571276900488?via%3Dihub

5. Ahmadi R, Ramazani N, Daryaeian M, Nabavi S. In vitro Comparison of Microleakage of Nanofilled and Flowable Composites in Restoring Class V Cavities in Primary Molars. J Res Med Sci. 2013 [acceso: 20/12/2019]; 15(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b10d/5673826315108aae1aeff78e0c71e1764f75.pdf

6. Akah MM, Daifalla LE, Yousry MM. Bonding of bulk fill versus contemporary resin composites: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016 [acceso: 20/12/2019]; 9(20). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/article/view/90525

7. 7 Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J. 2017 [acceso: 20/12/2019]; 222(5). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2017.214

8. Hirata R Kabbach W, De Andrade O, Bonfante E, Giannini M, Coelho P. Bulk fill composites: an anatomic sculpting technique. J. Esthet. Dent. 2015 [acceso: 16/12/2019]; 27(6). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jerd.12159

9. Corral C, Vildósola P, Bersezio C, Alves Dos Campos E, Fernández E. Revisión del estado actual de resinas compuestas Bulk-Fill. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2015 [acceso: 17/12/2019]; 27(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/odont/article/view/19805

10. Gamarra VSS, Borges GA, Junior LHB, Spohr AM. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of a bulk-fill composite resin photopolymerized with different techniques. Odontology. 2018;106(1). PMID: 28160094

11. Gaintantzopoulou M, Gopinath V, Zinelis S. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21(4). PMID: 27165307

12. Mosharrafian S, Heidari A, Rahbar P. Microleakage of Two bulk fill and One Conventional Composite in Class II Restorations of Primary Posterior Teeth. J Dent (Tehran) . 2017;14(3). PMCID: PMC5694844

13. Eltoum N, Bakry N, Talaat D, Elshabrawy S. Microleakage evaluation of bulk fill composite in class II restorations of primary molars. ADJ. 2019;44. PMCID: PMC5694844

14. Öter B, Deniz K, Çehreli SB. Preliminary data on clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations in primary molars. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21. PMID: 30417848

15. Ehlers V, Gran K, Callaway A, Azrak B, Ernst CP. One-year Clinical Performance of Flowable Bulk-fill Composite vs Conventional Compomer Restorations in Primary Molars. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(3). PMID: 31093618