medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Nefrología, Diálisis y Trasplante

ISSN 0326-3428 (Print)
Órgano de difusión científica de la Asociación Nefrológica de Buenos Aires
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl 2022; 42 (2)

Reliability and validity of the turkish version of the selfmanagement scale for kidney transplant recipients

Erdem C, Cebeci F
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 24
Page: 117-123
PDF size: 205.80 Kb.


Key words:

kidney transplantation, self-management, scale validity and reliability.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Self-management is defined as the active participation of individuals in their own treatment processes. Kidney transplant recipients to participate in their care are important in terms of the graft survival and their general health. Objective: The aim of this study was, therefore, to establish the Turkish reliability and validity of the Self-Management Scale for Kidney Transplant Recipients. Methods: Data were collected using a “Patient Introduction Form” and the Self-Management Scale for Kidney Transplant Recipients. Number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, content validity index, factor analysis, test-retest, correlation analysis and Cronbach’s alpha were used. Results: Scale adaptation method recommended by the World Health Organization was used. The item content validity index was 0.99, the scale content validity index was 0.93, and both were 1.00 in terms of content. Exploratory factor analysis was used, which revealed 3 factors with loadings ranging from 0.42 to 0.79. Reliability coefficient was 0.73. Test-retest reliability was statistically significant (p=‹0.05). Conclusions: The turkish version of self-management scale for kidney transplant recipients is a valid, reliable, and complementary tool. Healthcare professionals can use it to assess kidney transplant recipients’ self-management skills.


REFERENCES

  1. Turquía. Ministry of Health. Organ transplant waitinglist and transplantations statistics in the Turkey 2018[Internet]. Disponible en: (consulta: 18/02/2021).

  2. Urstad KH. Patient Education for Renal TransplantRecipients [Tesis doctoral]. Oslo: Faculty of Medicine,University of Oslo, 2013. Disponible en: (consulta:18/02/2021).

  3. Ding D. Post-kidney transplant rejection and infectioncomplications. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010;37(4):419-26.

  4. Berben L, Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F, Engberg S,Vanhaecke J, Crespo-Leiro MG, et al.; BRIGHT studyconsortium. Building research initiative group: chronicillness management and adherence in transplantation(BRIGHT) study: study protocol. J Adv Nurs.2015;71(3):642-54. doi: 10.1111/jan.12519.

  5. Lin SY, Fetzer SJ, Lee PC, Chen CH. Predicting adherenceto health care recommendations using health promotionbehaviours in kidney transplant recipients within 1-5years post-transplant. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(23-24):3313-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03757.x.

  6. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K.Patient self-management of chronic disease in primarycare. JAMA. 2002;288(19):2469-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2469.

  7. Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education:history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms.Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01.

  8. Grady PA, Gough LL. Self-management: a comprehensiveapproach to management of chronic conditions. AmJ Public Health. 2014;104(8):e25-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041.

  9. Moore SM, Schiffman R, Waldrop-Valverde D, RedekerNS, McCloskey DJ, Kim MT, et al. Recommendationsof common data elements to advance the science of selfmanagementof chronic conditions. J Nurs Scholarsh.2016;48(5):437-47. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12233.

  10. Haspeslagh A, De Bondt K, Kuypers D, Naesens M,Breunig C, Dobbels F. Completeness and satisfactionwith the education and information received by patientsimmediately after kidney transplant: a mixed-modelsstudy. Prog Transplant. 2013;23(1):12-22. doi: 10.7182/pit2013249.

  11. Schmid-Mohler G, Schäfer-Keller P, Frei A, Fehr T,Spirig R. A mixed-method study to explore patients’perspective of self-management tasks in the early phaseafter kidney transplant. Prog Transplant. 2014;24(1):8-18. doi: 10.7182/pit2014728.

  12. Kobus G, Małyszko J, Małyszko JS, Puza E,Bachórzewska-Gajewska H, Myśliwiec M. Compliancewith lifestyle recommendations in kidney allograftrecipients. Transplant Proc. 2011;43(8):2930-4. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.08.031.

  13. Kosaka S, Tanaka M, Sakai T, Tomikawa S, Yoshida K,Chikaraishi T, et al. Development of self-managementscale for kidney transplant recipients, includingmanagement of post-transplantation chronic kidneydisease. ISRN Transplantation. 2013;2013:1-7. doi:10.5402/2013/619754.

  14. Khezerloo S, Mahmoudi H, Vafadar Z. Evaluatingthe psychometric properties of the persian selfmanagementscale for kidney transplant recipients. UrolJ. 2019;16(2):186-192. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4339.

  15. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: areyou sure you know what’s being reported? Critique andrecommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97.doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.

  16. Atkinson TM, Rosenfeld BD, Sit L, Mendoza TR,Fruscione M, Lavene D, et al. Using confirmatory factoranalysis to evaluate construct validity of the Brief PainInventory (BPI). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(3):558-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.05.008.

  17. Çapik C. Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validityand reliability studies. Anadolu Hemsirelik Saglik BilimleriDerg. 2014;17(3):196--205.

  18. Büyüköztürk Ş. Data Analysis Guidebook for SocialSciences: Statistics, Research Design, SPSS-Applications andInterpretation. 18th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2013.

  19. Çokluk Ö, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş. MultivariateStatistic for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications.2th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2012.

  20. Pourmand G, Dehghani S, Rahmati MR, MehrsaiA, Gooran S, Alizadeh F, et al. Does hypertensionremain after kidney transplantation? Acta Med Iran.2015;53(5):297-300.

  21. Saint-Remy A, Somja M, Gellner K, Weekers L,Bonvoisin C, Krzesinski JM. Urinary and dietary sodium,and potassium associated with blood pressure controlin treated hypertensive kidney transplant recipients: anobservational study. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:121. doi:10.1186/1471-2369-13-121.

  22. Soypacaci Z, Sengul S, Yıldız EA, Keven K, Kutlay S,Erturk S, et al. Effect of daily sodium intake on posttransplanthypertension in kidney allograft recipients.Transplant Proc. 2013;45(3):940-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.050.

  23. Brown IJ, Tzoulaki I, Candeias V, Elliott P. Salt intakesaround the world: implications for public health. IntJ Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):791-813. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp139.

  24. Veater NL, East L. Exploring depression amongstkidney transplant recipients: a literature review. J RenCare. 2016;42(3):172-84. doi: 10.1111/jorc.12162.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. 2022;42