medigraphic.com
ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)

2006, Number 6

Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 2006; 73 (6)

Neonatal circumcision: Whay? How? Arguments to debate

Vega FL

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 261-262
PDF size: 72.85 Kb.


Text Extraction

No abstract


REFERENCES

  1. Ponteziani BJC. Historia de la circuncisión y su trascendencia en las diferentes culturas de la humanidad.

  2. Hovsepian D. The pros and cons of routine circumcision. Calif Med 1951: 359-61

  3. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on circumcision. Circumcision Policy Statement. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 686-93.

  4. Lander J, Brady-Fryer B, Metcalf JB, Nazarali S, Muttitt S. Comparison of rig block dorsal penile nerve block and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278:2157-62.

  5. O’Hara MB, LeMoine C, Guillet R. Analgesia for neonatal circumcision: A randomized controlled trial of EMLA cream versus dorsal penile nerve block. Pediatrics 1998: 691.

  6. Olson TL, Downey VW. Infant physiological responses to noxius stimuli of circumcision with anesthesia and analgesia. Pediatr Nurs 1998; 24: 385-9.

  7. Gradin M, Finnstrom O, Shollin J. Feeding and oral glucose-additive effects on pain reduction in newborns. Early Hum Dev 2004; 77: 57-65.

  8. Schoen EJ. Benefits of newborn circumcision: in Europe ignoring medical evidence? Arch Dis Child 1997; 77: 258-60.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com