Taborda-Samper MA, Orozco-Naranjo M, Zamora-Cely LM

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 150-155
PDF size: 158.28 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: septal perforations and surgical correction are a challenge for ENT specialists. Several techniques for closing septal perforations are described in the literature; however, its results in terms of effectiveness are variable and with small sample sizes. The technique of closure of septal perforation with cartilage grafts has been performed for 8 years in the ENT department of Hospital de San José with a successful clinical response. Aims: to describe the postoperative results of patients managed with the technique of surgical closure of septal perforation with cartilage grafts, in terms of complications and frequency of residual septal perforation. Design: descriptive cohort study. Methods: a cohort of patients managed with the surgical closure technique of septal perforation with grafts of bank cartilage or autologous cartilage are described. Patients were included from January 2014 to June 2018. Demographic, clinical data, complications and presentation of residual septal perforation were extracted from the clinical history. Results: The success rate of septal perforation closure was 78.3 %; being the most frequent etiologies antecedent of surgery and idiopathic. The most common complication was epistaxis in 26 % of patients, followed by pain in 21.7 % in the postoperative period, which improved in subsequent controls. Conclusion: the results with the technique of closure of septal perforation with bank grafting were satisfactory in this population.

REFERENCES

1. Oberg D, Akerlund A, Johansson L, Bende M. Prevalence ofnasal septal perforation: the Skövde population-based study.Rhinology. 2003;41(2):72-5.

2. Diamantopoulos II, Jones NS. The investigation of nasal septalperforations and ulcers. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115(7):541-4.https//doi.org/10.1258/0022215011908441

3. Taylor RJ, Sherris DA. Prosthetics for nasal perforations:a systematic review and meta-analysis. OtolaryngolHead Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):803-10. https//doi.org/10.1177/0194599815577084

4. Kim SW, Rhee CS. Nasal septal perforation repair: predictivefactors and systematic review of the literature. Curr OpinOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;20(1):58-65. https//doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834dfb21

5. Wong S, Raghavan U. Outcome of surgical closure of nasalseptal perforation. J Laryngol Otol. 2010;124(8):868-74. https//doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110000745

6. Watson D, Barkdull G. Surgical management of the septalperforation. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(3):483-93.https//doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.03.011

7. Bast F, Heimer A, Schrom T. Surgical closure of nasoseptaldefects: postoperative patient satisfaction. ORL JOtorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2012;74(6):299-303. https//doi.org/10.1159/000345499

8. Moon IJ, Kim SW, Han DH, Kim ST, Min YG, Lee CH, et al.Predictive factors for the outcome of nasal septal perforationrepair. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011;38(1):52-7. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2010.05.006

9. Kridel RW. Considerations in the etiology, treatment, andrepair of septal perforations. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am.2004;12(4):435-50, vi. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2004.04.014

10. Schultz-Coulon HJ. Three-layer repair of nasoseptal defects.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(2):213-8. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.066

11. Dosen LK, Haye R. Surgical closure of nasal septal perforation.Early and long term observations. Rhinology. 2011;49(4):486-91. https//doi.org/10.4193/Rhino10.236

12. Romo T 3rd, Foster CA, Korovin GS, Sachs ME. Repair of nasalseptal perforation utilizing the midface degloving technique.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(7):739-42. https//doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1988.01860190043019

13. Murakami CS, Kriet JD, Ierokomos AP. Nasal reconstructionusing the inferior turbinate mucosal flap. Arch Facial PlastSurg. 1999;1(2):97-100. https//doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.1.2.97

14. Bank J, Beederman M, Naclerio RM, Gottlieb LJ. Prelaminatedfascia lata free flap for large nasal septal defect reconstruction.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(10):1440-3. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.027

15. Pereira C, Santamaría A, Langdon C, López-Chacón M,Hernández-Rodríguez J, Alobid I. Nasoseptal Perforation: fromEtiology to Treatment. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18(1):5.https//doi.org/10.1007/s11882-018-0754-1

16. Hong SN, Mutsumay S, Jin HR. Long-term Results ofCombined Rhinoplasty and Septal Perforation Repair. JAMAFacial Plast Surg. 2016;18(6):475-80. https//doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0829

17. Delaney SW, Kridel RWH. Contemporary Trends in theSurgical Management of Nasal Septal Perforations: ACommunity Survey. Facial Plast Surg. 2019;35(1):78-84.https//doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676049

18. Newton JR, White PS, Lee MS. Nasal septal perforationrepair using open septoplasty and unilateral bipedicledflaps. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117(1):52-5. https//doi.org/10.1258/002221503321046649

19. Raol N, Olson K. A novel technique to repair moderate-sizednasoseptal perforations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.

20. 2012;138(8):714-6. https//doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2012.120420. Kaya E, Cingi C, Olgun Y, Soken H, Pinarbasli Ö. Three layerinterlocking: a novel technique for repairing a nasal septumperforation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(3):212-5.https//doi.org/10.1177/0003489414550859

21. Sapmaz E, Toplu Y, Somuk BT. A new classification for septalperforation and effects of treatment methods on quality oflife. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;85(6):716-723. https//doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.06.003

22. Kridel RWH, Delaney SW. Discussion: Acellular HumanDermal Allograft as a Graft for Nasal Septal PerforationReconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(6):1525-7.https//doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004434