medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Latin American Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

ISSN 2992-7757 (Electronic)
Órgano de difusión de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Cirugía y Traumatología Bucomaxilofacial (ALACIBU)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Lat Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022; 2 (3)

Success algorithm for choosing reconstruction material for medial wall fractures associated with orbital floor in key area reconstruction. A series of cases

Guerra RC, Borim PBF, Pereira R, Nastri LD, Garcia JIR, Hochuli VE, Hammer B
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/108188

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/108188
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/108188

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 113-118
PDF size: 352.20 Kb.


Key words:

Orbital fractures, titanium mesh implant, orbital floor fracture.

ABSTRACT

Orbital fractures are common facial injuries that usually occur in patients diagnosed with zygomatic-orbital fractures and can be classified as pure blow-out fractures or be part of panfacial injuries. Orbital wall fractures occur through the two main mechanisms, by impact on the soft tissues and impact on the solid structures of the orbital wall. Medial orbital wall fractures usually involve the lamina papyracea of the ethmoid bone, which is the largest and thinnest component, and is responsible for the most vulnerable part of the medial wall of the orbit. Therefore, these fractures are affected by a combination of increased intra-orbital pressure and dissipated force from the medial orbital rim. For the treatment of large orbital fractures, a coronal approach along with local incisions becomes necessary and it is unquestionable to use these surgical approaches to expose the fracture lines and subsequently define the reconstruction sequence. The reason that titanium mesh has provided better results in reconstructions is due to the ease with which the mesh can be shaped to fit the intricate contours of the internal orbit. This paper aims to describe a series of three clinical cases of orbital reconstruction, mainly roof and medial wall fractures of the orbit reconstructed using titanium mesh and to address the possible complications in this type of treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Gruss JS, Bubak PJ, Egbert MA. Craniofacial fractures. An algorithm to optimize results. Clin Plast Surg. 1992; 19 (1): 195-206.

  2. Jaquiéry C, Aeppli C, Cornelius P, Palmowsky A, Kunz C, Hammer B. Reconstruction of orbital wall defects: critical review of 72 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36 (3): 193-199.

  3. Pereira Rdos S, Jorge-Boos FB, Hochuli-Vieira E, da Rocha HV, Homsi N, de Melo WM. Management of pure medial orbital wall fracture with autogenous bone graft. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24 (5): e475-477.

  4. Kontio R. Treatment of orbital fractures: the case for reconstruction with autogenous bone. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62 (7): 863-868.

  5. Shere JL, Boole JR, Holtel MR, Amoroso PJ. An analysis of 3599 midfacial and 1141 orbital blowout fractures among 4426 United States Army Soldiers, 1980-2000. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130 (2): 164-170.

  6. Duma SM, Jernigan MV. The effects of airbags on orbital fracture patterns in frontal automobile crashes. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 19 (2): 107-111.

  7. Kersey TL, Ng SG, Rosser P, Sloan B, Hart R. Orbital adherence with titanium mesh floor implants: a review of 10 cases. Orbit. 2013; 32 (1): 8-11.

  8. Ellis E, Tan Y. Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61 (4): 442-453.

  9. Lee WT, Kim HK, Chung SM. Relationship between small-size medial orbital wall fracture and late enophthalmos. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20 (1): 75-80.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Table 1

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Lat Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;2