medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Neurociencias

Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Arch Neurocien 2022; 27 (3)

Experiencia de cirugía estereotáctica entre los años 2000 y 2020 en el Hospital Militar Central, Bogotá, Colombia

Duarte-Mora DP, Palacino-Domínguez PV, Rojas-Romero LO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 23-27
PDF size: 158.00 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

ABSTRACT

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Gildenberg P. Stereotactic Surgery – The Past and the Future. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1998; 70: 57-70.

  2. Bernstein M, Parrent A. Complications of CT-guided stereotactic biopsy of intra-axial brain lesion. J Neurosurg. 1994; 81: 165-168.

  3. Sampath R, Wadhwa R, Tawfik T, Nanda A, Guthikonda B. Stereotactic placement of ventricular catheters: does it affect proximalmalfunction rates? Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012; 90(2):97-103.

  4. Leu S, Halbeisen F, Mariani L, Soleman J. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided compared to stereotactic navigated ventriculoperitonealshunt placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled study. Trials. 2021; 22(1): 350. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05306-5.

  5. Chow, F. Brain and Spinal Epidural Abscess. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2018; 24: 1327-48. doi:10.1212/con.0000000000000649.

  6. Zorro O, Ordoñez-Rubiano EG, Camacho JE, Tshampel-Garvin A, Burgos RA, Acevedo JC, et al. Procedimientos neuroquirúrgicoscerebrales guiados por estereotaxia realizados en el Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio (HUSI): evolución a corto y mediano plazo.Univ Med. 2013; 54(1): 39-52.

  7. Ordóñez-Rubiano EG, Rodríguez-Vargas S, Ospina-Osorio J, Zorro-Guío OF, Patiño JG, Sánchez Rueda M. Stereotactic frame-basedguided brain biopsies: experience in a center in Latin America. Rev Chil Neuroc. 2018; 44: 140-144.

  8. Riche M, Amelot A, Peyre M, Capelle L, Carpentier A, Mathon B. Complications after frame-based stereotactic brain biopsy: a systematicreview. Neurosurg Rev. 2021; 44(1): 301-307. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01234-w.

  9. Quick-Weller J, Tichy J, Dinc N, Tritt S, Won SY, Behmanesh B, et al. Benefit and complications of frame-based stereotactic biopsy in oldand very old patients. World Neurosurg. 2017; 102: 442-448. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.059.

  10. Terao T, Takahashi H, Yokochi F, Taniguchi M, Okiyama R, Hamada I. Hemorrhagic complication of stereotactic surgery in patients withmovement disorders. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(6): 1241-6.

  11. Ward M, Ahmed M, Markosian C, Ezike JZ, Agrawal R, Randhawa K, et al. Complications associated with deep brain stimulation forParkinson’s disease: a MAUDE study. Br J Neurosurg. 2021; 35(5): 625-8. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1935727.

  12. Lara-Almunia M, Hernández-Vicente J. Related factors with diagnostic yield and intracranial hemorrhagic complications in frame-basedstereotactic biopsy. Review Neurocirugia. 2021; 32(6): 285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.neucie.2021.04.004.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Neurocien. 2022;27