medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Urología

ISSN 2305-7939 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

RCU 2021; 10 (2)

Telemedicine in Urology by Necessity during the COVID-19 Emergency

Lama PJR, Leanez JMR, Candau Vargas-Zúñiga F, Ocon REM, Alonso FJJ, Beltrán AVM, Bachiller BJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 1-9
PDF size: 358.50 Kb.


Key words:

telemedicine, urology, COVID-19.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical practice has been forced to evolve rapidly to respond to delays in face-to-face care. It has had to adopt new out of necessity skills and strategies, such as telemedicine.
Objective: Describe the practice and methodology adopted in the tele-consultation of the San Juan de Dios Aljarafe Hospital in Sevilla, Spain.
Methods: Five urologists of our center reviewed the clinical priority of care based on the severity of the disease, patients pending first evaluation and pending review. Patients were classified into three groups: green (delayable), yellow (priority), and red (non-delayable). If because of their clinical condition they were susceptible to evaluation in primary care levels, they were discharged.
Results: A total of 2037 patients were classified; 887 were first visits (PV) and 1150 were revisions (RV). Of the total number, 1015 (49.8%) were discharged, including 391 PV (38.52%). Non-delaying appointments were 11.58%. Priority delaying appointments were 19.87% of RVs and 9.13% of PV. The delayed PV group included 307 PV patients (34.61 %) and 274 RV patients (43.91 %).
Conclusion: Telemedicine can be used as a tool in the prioritization of consultations, with a high percentage of resolution (49.8%) with no face-to-face appointment.


REFERENCES

  1. Thomas HL. Creating the New Normal: The Clinician Response to Covid-19. Catalyst non-issue content. Catalyst.nejm.org. 2020 [acceso 17/11/2020]. Disponible en: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0076

  2. Ficarra V, Novara G, Abrate A, Bartoletti R, Crestani A, De Nunzio C, et al. Urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica. 2020;72(3). Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  3. Puliatti S, Eissa A, Eissa R, Amato M, Mazzone E, Dell’Oglio P, et al. COVID-19 and urology: a comprehensive review of the literature. BJU International. 2020;06;125.

  4. Campi R, Amparore D, Capitanio U, Checcucci E, Salonia A, Fiori C, et al. Assessing the Burden of Nondeferrable Major Uro-oncologic Surgery to Guide Prioritization Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Three Italian High-volume Referral Centres. European Urology. 2020;78(1):11-15.

  5. John O. Video consultations for triage of patients with covid-19. BMJ. 2020;1583.

  6. Goldman H, Haber G. Recommendations for Tiered Stratification of Urological Surgery Urgency in the COVID-19 Era. Journal of Urology. 2020;204(1):11-13.

  7. De la Fuente Ballesteros S, García Granja N, Hernández Carrasco M, Hidalgo Benito A, García Álvarez I, García Ramón E. La consulta no presencial como herramienta de mejora de la consulta a demanda en atención primaria. Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN. 2018;44(7):458-462.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

RCU. 2021;10