medigraphic.com
ISSN 1405-8871 (Print)

2023, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Aten Fam 2023; 30 (1)

Guidelines to be Followed when Publishing in the Atención Familiar Journal

Dávila-Mendoza R, López-Ortiz G

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 73-77
PDF size: 156.69 Kb.


ABSTRACT

In several institutions dedicated to the academic preparation of general practitioners and specialists, there are no formal courses on scientific writing, which leads to a lack of knowledge about the common elements that different types of medical articles should cover and makes it impossible to develop the necessary skills and abilities to disseminate knowledge. Given this context, the aim of this text is to provide guidelines for publishing different types of articles in the Atención Familiar Journal, and following and adhering to them will allow authors to increase the possibility of acceptance of their manuscripts.


REFERENCES

  1. Huisman J, Smits J. Duration and quality of thepeer review process: the author’s perspective. Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):633-50. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5

  2. Ezeala C, Nweke I, Ezeala M. Common errors inmanuscripts submitted to medical science journals.Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3(3):376-9. DOI:10.4103/2141-9248.117957

  3. Gay JT, Edgil AE. When your manuscript is rejected.Nurs Health Care. 1989;10(8):459-61.

  4. Hernández-Vargas A, Pérez-Manjarrez FE, Mendiola-Pastrana IR, López-Ortiz E, López-Ortiz G.Errores más comunes al redactar artículos médicosoriginales. Gac Med Mex. 2019;155(6):635-640.DOI: 10.24875/GMM.19005172

  5. Mendiola Pastrana IR, Hernández AV, Pérez ManjarrezFE, López EO, Romero-Henríquez LF, López-Ortiz G. Peer-Review and Rejection Causes inSubmitting Original Medical Manuscripts. J ContinEduc Health Prof. 2020;40(3):182-6. DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000295

  6. Bradley SH, DeVito NJ, Lloyd KE, Richards GC,Rombey T, Wayant C, et al. Reducing bias and improvingtransparency in medical research: a criticaloverview of the problems, progress and suggestednext steps. J R Soc Med. 2020;113(11):433-43.DOI: 10.1177/0141076820956799

  7. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in theproduction and reporting of research evidence.The Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9

  8. Meador KJ. Decline of clinical research in academicmedical centers. Neurology. 2015;85(13):1171-6.DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001818

  9. Sharma S. Professional medical writing support: Theneed of the day. Perspect Clin Res. 2018;9(3):111-112. DOI: 10.4103/picr.PICR_47_18

  10. Lee GSJ, Chin YH, Jiang AA, Mg CH, NistalaKRY, Iyer SG, et al. Teaching Medical Research toMedical Students: a Systematic Review. Med SciEduc. 2021;31(2):945-62. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01183-w

  11. Río-de-la-Loza-Zamora JG, López-Ortiz G. Barreraspara el desarrollo de investigación en medicinafamiliar en Iberoamérica: Revisión sistemática. RevMex Med Fam. 2022;9(2):49-58. DOI: 10.24875/RMF.21000125

  12. icmje-recommendations.pdf [Internet]. [Citado2022 Ago 25]. Disponible en: https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf

  13. The EQUATOR Network | Enhancing the QUAlityand Transparency Of Health Research [Internet].[Citado 2022 Ago 25]. Disponible en:https://www.equator-network.org/

  14. Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K. Peer Review in ScientificPublications: Benefits, Critiques, & A SurvivalGuide. EJIFCC. 2014;25(3):227-43.

  15. Tumin D, Tobias J. The peer review process. SaudiJ Anaesth. 2019;13(S1):S52-S58. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18

  16. Jawaid SA, Jawaid M. Author’s failure to readand follow instructions leads to increased traumato their manuscripts. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(3).DOI: 10.12669/pjms.343.15633

  17. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG,Gřtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al.Strengthening the Reporting of ObservationalStudies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanationand Elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18(6):805-35. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511

  18. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA,Cook DA. Standards for Reporting QualitativeResearch: A Synthesis of Recommendations.Academic Medicine. 2014;89(9):1245-51. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

  19. Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, Aronson JK, vonSchoen-Angerer T, Tugwell P, et al. CARE guidelinesfor case reports: explanation and elaborationdocument. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;89:218-35.DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026

  20. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V,Gřtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updatedguidelines for reporting parallel group randomisedtrials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c869

  21. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I,Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA2020 statement: an updated guideline for reportingsystematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com