medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Acta Médica 2021; 22 (3)

Axillary augmentation mastoplasty without endoscope

Expósito JA, Escobar VH, Tamayo CAM, González BJS

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page:
PDF size: 215.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Augmentation mastoplasty is one of the most common plastic surgery procedures in those women who are not satisfied with the size of their breasts. It was the plastic surgeon Hoeler who, in 1973, performed the first axillary breast augmentation. The absence of scars in the mammary region and the better control in the positioning of the inframammary groove are among the main advantages of this surgical technique.
Objective: to evaluate the results of axillary augmentation mastoplasty, with no endoscope.
Methods: A descriptive, prospective, longitudinal-cut study was conducted in patients diagnosed with breast hypoplasia at “Hermanos Ameijeiras” Surgical Clinical Hospital from March 2016 to March 2019. The sample consisted of 18 patients.
Results: The average age of the patients was 27.1±3.8 years, with predominance of those with white skin color (66.7%). Surgical wound dehiscence was the only postoperative complication for 5.6%; adequate cosmetic results were predominant (72.1%). The volume of the implant placed was between 226 and 250 cc (44.4%). The good result at the end of the treatment predominated (72.1%), all the patients felt satisfied.
Conclusions: Axillary augmentation mastoplasty with no endoscope is a safe and easy option to perform for patients who do not want a visible scar on the breast, it offers good results with very low percentage of complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Tamayo Carbón AM, Orozco Jaramillo MA, Rendón Oliva IE, Posada Ruiz DA,Valdivia Llanes J. Resultados en mastoplastia reductora por técnica de McKissockmodificada en la hipertrofia mamaria moderada. Acta Médica. 2020[acceso:25/06/2021];21(1):e42. Disponible enhttp://www.revactamedica.sld.cu/index.php/act/article/view/42/pdf

  2. Tamayo Carbon AM, Vila Garcia E, Valdivia Llanes JT, Reyes Perez AO,Cuastumal Figueroa DK. Reductive Mastoplasty with Medial Pedicle Flap inPatients with Symptomatic Breast Hypertrophy. Int J Transplant & Plastic Surg.2020;4(2):000152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23880/ijtps-16000152

  3. Messa CA. One-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Ten-YearReview of 2183 Consecutive Procedures. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):1352-67.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz143

  4. Lee DW, Kim SJ, Kim H. Endoscopic Transaxillary Versus InframammaryApproaches for Breast Augmentation Using Shaped Implants: A Matched Case-Control Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(3):563-8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01324-6

  5. Vallarta Rodriguez RA, Ruiz Treviño JJ, Guerrero Burgos F. Mamaplastia deaumento inteligente manipulando vectores tisulares. Cirugía Plástica.2014[acceso:25/06/2021];24 (1):40-9. Disponible en:https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/cplast/cp-2014/cp141e.pdf

  6. Li Z, Mu D, Xu B, Wang C, Cheng H, Li S, Qi J. Drainage Collection AfterEndoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty UsingCold or Electrosurgical Separation of Interpectoral Space. Plast Surg (Oakv).2020;28(1):19-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550319880913

  7. Calderón JM, Carriquiry C. Actualidad en mastoplastia de aumento. Horiz Med2016[acceso:25/06/2021];16(2):54-62. Disponible en:http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/hm/v16n2/a10v16n2.pdf

  8. Sim HB. Tran’s axillary endoscopic breast augmentation. Arch Plast Surg.2014;41(5):458-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.458

  9. Peter C. Neligan. Cirugía Plástica Mama. 3ra. Ed. Panamá: Amolca: 2017. pp.81-96.

  10. Strock LL. Reoperative Transaxillary Approach Algorithm: Extending theSurgical Alternatives for Secondary Breast Augmentation in the Era of ScarlessSurgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(11):1193-5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa046

  11. Foissac R, Camuzard O, Fernández J, Levy J. A Modified Patient Positioningfor Transaxillary Breast Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(1):228-31.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0766-y

  12. Streit L, Dražan L, Novák P, Schneiderová M, Dvořák Z, Teplá K, et al.Lipomodelling - advanced technique for the correction of Congenital hypoplastic breast malformations and deformities. Acta Chir Plast. 2016;58(2):70-6. PMID:28079392.

  13. Buenrostro Vásquez C, Buck Soltero JA, Morales Valle LA, Granados TinajeroSO. Anestesia en liposucción de grandes volúmenes. Anestesia en México.2017[acceso:25/06/2021];29(1):64-76. Disponible en:http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/am/v29s1/2448-8771-am-29-00064.pdf

  14. Huang GJ, Wichmann JL, Mills DC. Transaxillary subpectoral augmentationmammaplasty: a single surgeon's 20-year experience. Aesthet Surg J.2011;31(7):781-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11416936

  15. Li S, Mu D, Liu C, Xin M, Fu S, Xu B, et al. Complications FollowingSubpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis. AestheticPlast Surg. 2019;43(4):890-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01404-7

  16. Pelle Ceravolo M, Del Vescovo A, Bertozzi E. A technique to decrease breastshape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentationmammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;28:288-94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3023-0

  17. Becker H, Fregosi N. The Impact of Animation Deformity on Quality of Life inPost-Mastectomy Reconstruction Patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(5):531-6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw264

  18. Gryskiewicz J, LeDuc R. Transaxillary Nonendoscopic SubpectoralAugmentation Mammaplasty: A 10-Year Experience With Gel vs. Saline in 2000Patients-With Long-Term Patient Satisfaction Measured by the BREAST-Q. AesthetSurg J. 2014;34(5):696-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14530552

  19. Weck AC. Comparative analysis of endoscopic transaxillary augmentationmammoplasty without endoscopic assistance. Rev Bras Cir Plás. 2013[acceso:25/06/2021];28(3):348-58. Disponible en:http://www.rbcp.org.br/details/1424/comparative-analysis-of-endoscopictransaxillary-augmentation-mammaplasty-without-endoscopic-assistance

  20. Danillaa S, Ríos MA, Cuevas P, Troncoso E, Domínguez C, Jara R, et al.Cambios en la calidad de vida en mujeres sometidas a aumento mamario.Resultados preliminares de un estudio de cohortes. Rev Chil Cir. 2016;68(4):289-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rchic.2015.12.001

  21. Albornoz CR, Pusic AL, Danilla S. Evaluación de resultados quirúrgicos desdela perspectiva del paciente. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2016;27:107-12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2016.01.013




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com