medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica de Cuba

ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 3

<< Back

Rev Acta Médica 2021; 22 (3)

Removal of chest tube in a patient with persistent air leak

Pérez PJ, Pérez GK, Martínez GA, Sosa MJG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page:
PDF size: 437.68 Kb.


Key words:

persistent air leak, pleural empyema, chest tube, unresectable lung cancer.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Air leak is the most common complication in thoracic surgery. It is currently a contraindication for the removal of the chest tube. However, there have been reports of cases where removal of the chest tube is described in the presence of air leak. Many surgeons are skeptical, and this approach is presently considered a controversial issue.
Objective: To report the case of a patient operated on for unresectable lung cancer assisted with a chest tube, which was later removed, despite presenting persistent air leakage.
Case report: The case of a 61-year-old male patient who underwent an exploratory thoracotomy for unresectable lung cancer is reported. Later, he evolved with empyema and persistent air leak, the chest tube was clamped and it was successfully removed.
Conclusions: In patients with persistent air leak, removal of the chest tube can be evaluated if criteria such as the absence of subcutaneous emphysema, pleural empyema, as well as lung collapse are met in an evolutionary radiological study when the tube is occluded for a period of 24 hours.


REFERENCES

  1. Seder CW, Basu S, Ramsay T, Rocco G, Blackmon S, Liptay MJ, et al. Aprolonged air leak score for lung cancer resection: an analysis of the STS GTSD.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108(5):1478-83. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.05.069

  2. Kato R, Kobayashi T, Walanabe M, Kawamura M, Kikuchi K. Kobayashi T, et al.Can the chest tube draining the pleural cavity with persistent air leakage beremoved? Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon. 1992;40:292-6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1020167

  3. Cerfolio RJ, Minnich DJ, Bryant AS. The removal of chest tubes despite an airleak or a pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1690-6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.01.077

  4. Sakata KK, Reisenauer JS, Kern RM, Mullon JJ. Persistent air leak-review.Respir Med. 2018;137:213-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2018.03.017

  5. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chesttubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2008;135:269-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.066

  6. Marasco RD, Giudice G, Lequaglie C. How to distinguish an active air leak froma pleural space effect. Asian Cardiovascular & Thoracic Annals. 2012;20(6) 682-8.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492312451918

  7. Baringer K, Talbert S. Chest drainage systems and management of air leaksafter a pulmonary resection. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(12):5399-403. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.11.15

  8. Shen KR, Bribriesco A, Crabtree T, Denlinger C, Eby C, Eiken P, et al. TheAmerican Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines for themanagement of empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:e129-46. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.01.030

  9. Bedawi EO, Hassan M, McCracken D, Rahman NM. Pleural infection: a closerlook at the etiopathogenesis, microbiology and role of antibiotics. Expert RevRespir Med. 2019;13(4):337-47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2019.1578212

  10. Singh S, Singh SK, Tentu AK. Management of parapneumonic effusion andempyema. J Assoc Chest Physicians. 2019;7:51-8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_24_18




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Acta Médica. 2021;22