medigraphic.com

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Enfermería Universitaria 2018; 15 (2)

Critical discourse analysis in health research

Urra-Medina E, Sandoval-Barrientos S

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 199-211
PDF size: 271.58 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The analysts of the critical discourse refer language as being a social practice. This implies a dialectic relationship between a discursive event in particular, and the situations, institutions, and social structures framing it. Thus, the discourse is socially constituted and conditioned, and from this perspective, ideology and power become part of the conditioned language in terms of what can be said and what cannot. The analysis of the critical discourse, in particular that of N. Fairclough with its theoretical-methodological 3-D model, can support researchers to revealing the relationships of power and dominion in the dialectic dynamics among discursive events in a health phenomenon with social problematic.
Objective: This article of narrative review addresses the critical analysis of the discourse, highlighting its most important characteristics. The review is focused on the Norman Fairclough’s 3-D model, detailing its methodology and descriptive, interpretative, and social analysis development through some examples related to the area of health.


REFERENCES

  1. Urra E, Muñoz A, Peña J. El análisis del discurso como perspectiva metodológica para investigadoresde salud. Enferm. univ. 2013; 10(2): 50-7. [consultado 10 marzo 2017]. Disponible en:https://bit.ly/2IhN2Ir

  2. Gee JP. Discourse Analysis: What Makes it Critical? In: Rogers R. An introduction to critical discourseanalysis in education. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2011. P.23-46.

  3. Van Dijk TA. Análisis Crítico del Discurso: Critical Discourse Analysis. Rev. Austral. Cienc. Soc.2016; 30(1): 203-22.

  4. Wodak R, Meyer M. Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. In: WodakR, Meyer M. Methods of critical discourse analysis. 2nd ed. Londres: SAGE. 2009. P.1-33

  5. Chouliaraki L, Fairclough N. Discourse in late modernity. Rethinking critical discourse analysis.Cap. 1. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press; 1999.

  6. Fairclough N. Discourse and social change. Londres: Cambridge Polity Press; 1993.

  7. Blommaert J, Bulcaen C. Critical discourse analysis. Annu. Rev. Anthropol, 2000; 29(1): 447-66.

  8. Van Dijk TA. El estudio del discurso. En: Van Dijk TA. El discurso como estructura y proceso. 3ª ed.Barcelona: Gedisa; 2006. P.21-66.

  9. Rogers R, Malancharuvil-Berkers E, Mosley M, et al. Critical discourse analysis in Education: Areview of the literature. Rev. Educ. Res. 2005; 75(3): 365-416.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003365

  10. Kincheloe JL, Mclaren P. Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research. In: Hayes K, SteinbergSR, Tobin K. Bold Visions in Educational Research. Londres: Sense Publisher; 2011.

  11. Gee JP. Discourse analysis: what makes it critical? In: Rogers R. An introduction to critical discourseanalysis in education. 2nd ed. Londres: L. Erlbaum Associate; 2004.

  12. Kendall G. What is critical discourse analysis? Forum Qual Soc Res. 2007; 8(2): 29.http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.2.255

  13. Fairclough, N. Analyzing discourse. Textual analysis for social research. London and New York:Routledge; 2003.

  14. Richardson J. Analyzing newspapers: context, text and consequences. In: Richardson J. Analyzingnewspaper. An approach from critical discourse analysis. London: Palgrave MacMillan; 2007.P.15-44.

  15. Wooffitt R. Critical approaches to discourses analysis. In: Wooffitt R. Conversation analysis anddiscourse analysis. London: Sage. 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208765

  16. Gee JP. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2008.

  17. Weber M. Sociología del Poder. 2a ed. Madrid: Alianza; 2012.

  18. Foucault M. Las redes del poder. Argentina: Prometeo Libros; 2014.

  19. Habermas J. Teoría de la acción comunicativa: Complementos y estudios previos. Madrid: Trotta;2010.

  20. Wodak R. Meyer M. De qué trata el análisis crítico del discurso. Resumen de su historia, sus conceptosfundamentales y sus desarrollos En: Wodak R, Meyer M. Métodos de análisis del discurso.Barcelona: Gedisa; 2003. P.17-33.

  21. Fairclough N. Discourse as social practice. In: Fairclough N. Language and power. London: Logman;1989.

  22. Jorgensen M, Phillips L. Critical discourse analysis. In: Jorgensen M, Phillips L. Discourse analysisas Theory and method. London: Sage; 2002.

  23. Fairclough N. Discourse, change and hegemony. In: Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis: Thecritical study of language. London: Pearson education Limited; 2010.

  24. Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis. Londres: Longman; 1995.

  25. Fairclough N. Doing discourse analysis. In: Fairclough N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge:Polity Press; 2006.

  26. Rojo M. El análisis crítico del Discurso Fronteras y exclusión social en los discursos racistas. En:Iñiguez L. Análisis de discurso. Manual para las ciencias sociales. Barcelona: UOC; 2004.

  27. Locke T. The question of metalanguage. In: Locke T. Critical discourse analysis. London: ContinuumInternational Publishing Group; 2004.

  28. Meyer M, Vetter I. Two approaches to critical discourse analysis. In: Tistcher S, Meyer M, WodakR, et al. Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage; 2000.

  29. Bardosa de Pinho, L, Prado L, Bañon A. Análisis critico del discurso: Nuevas posibilidades parala investigacion cientifica en el campo de la salud mental. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2009;17(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692009000100020

  30. Stecher A. Fairclough y el lenguaje en el Nuevo Capitalismo: Análisis de las dimensiones discursivasdel mundo del trabajo. Psicoperspectivas 2014; 13(3): 19-29.http://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol13-Issue3-fulltext-526

  31. Ávila R, Gras P. “No sin él”: análisis crítico del discurso de las campañas de prevención del VIHdirigidas a hombres que tienen sexo con hombres en España (2006–2011). Discurso Soc. 2014;8(2): 137-81. [consultado 7 noviembre 2017]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2IfVvfe

  32. Hernández-Ibarra LE, Mercado-Martínez FJ. Estudio cualitativo sobre la atención médica a losenfermos crónicos en el Seguro Popular. Salud Pública Méx. 2013; 55(2): 179-84. [consultado 7noviembre 2017]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2GZO38O

  33. Rubio-Perdomo A, Hernández-Zinzun G. La ideología en la planificación normativa y la modernizaciónneoliberal: contextos y dispositivos de poder. Saúde debate. 2014; 38(103): 840-52.http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-1104.20140076

  34. Netto L, Lara-Silva K, Dos Santos-Rua M. Desenvolvimento de competências para promoção dasaúde e mudança no modelo assistencial. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2016; 25(2):1-7.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072016002150015




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com