medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 6

Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2022; 82 (6)

Solomon-Greenwell as the most accurate nomogram for female bladder outlet obstruction

Castro-Nuñez P, Noyola-Ávila I, Maldonado-Alcaraz E, Moreno-Palacios J, Terán AFS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 12
Page:
PDF size: 107.58 Kb.


Key words:

Female, bladder outlet obstruction, urodynamics.

ABSTRACT

Objective: Compare the different definitions for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in women with dysfunctional voiding (DV) and find which one is most specific and sensitive to achieve a more accurate diagnosis.
Materials and methods: a cross-sectional study of urodynamic investigation studies fr om women diagnosed with DV in a period from 2017-2020 were classified with obstruction or not, based on 6 urodynamic definitions. The control group were women who had been categorized with obstruction in at least 3 definitions of BOO. Likelihood positive ratio, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Statistical analysis was carried out by IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). A p <0.5 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 146 urodynamic studies were analyzed, Solomon-Greenwell nomogram has shown to be the more specific and sensitive, obtaining the highest likelihood positive ratio >100. The comparison between our the control group and every definition of BOO has shown statistically significant difference.
Conclusions: The diagnosis of BOO requires expertise and individualization, it is made through physical examination and complete urodynamic study, Solomon- Greenwell has shown to be specific and sensitive for diagnosis in the group of study.


REFERENCES

  1. Panicker JN, Anding R, Arlandis S, Blok B,Dorrepaal C, Harding C, et al. Do we understandvoiding dysfunction in women? Currentunderstanding and future perspectives: ICI-RS 2017. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(S4):S75–85.doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23709

  2. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, SwiftSE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An InternationalUrogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) jointreport on the terminology for female pelvicfloor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010Jan;21(1):5–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23709

  3. Pang KH, Campi R, Arlandis S, Bo K,Chapple CR, Costantini E, et al. DiagnosticTests for Female Bladder Outlet Obstruction:A Systematic Review from the EuropeanAssociation of Urology Non-neurogenicFemale LUTS Guidelines Panel. Eur UrolFocus. 2022;8(4):1015–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.09.003

  4. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A,Pesce F, Spangberg A, et al. Good urodynamicpractices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry,and pressure-flow studies. NeurourolUrodyn. 2002;21(3):261–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10066

  5. Farrar DJ, Osborne JL, Stephenson TP,Whiteside CG, Weir J, Berry J, et al. Aurodynamic view of bladder outflow obstructionin the female: factors influencing the results oftreatment. Br J Urol. 1975;47(7):815–22. doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1975.tb04062.x

  6. Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F, RoehrbornCG, Reisch JS, Zimmern PE. Proposed cutoffvalues to define bladder outlet obstructionin women. Urology. 1998;51(3):408–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00634-1

  7. Lemack GE, Zimmern PE. Pressure flowanalysis may aid in identifying women withoutflow obstruction. J Urol. 2000;163(6):1823–

  8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67552-08. Defreitas GA, Zimmern PE, Lemack GE, ShariatSF. Refining diagnosis of anatomic femalebladder outlet obstruction: comparison ofpressure-flow study parameters in clinicallyobstructed women with those of normal controls.Urology. 2004;64(4):675–9; discussion 679-681. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.089

  9. Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Bladder outletobstruction nomogram for women with lowerurinary tract symptomatology. Neurourologyand Urodynamics. 2000;19(5):553–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6777(2000)19:5<553::AID-NAU2>3.0.CO;2-B

  10. Solomon E, Yasmin H, Duffy M, Rashid T,Akinluyi E, Greenwell TJ. Developing andvalidating a new nomogram for diagnosing bladderoutlet obstruction in women. Neurourology andUrodynamics. 2018;37(1):368–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23307

  11. Solomon E, Yasmin H, Duffy M, Malde S,Ockrim J, Greenwell T. Concordance ofurodynamic definitions of female bladder outletobstruction. European Urology Supplements.2017;3(16):e1965–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-9056(17)31177-6

  12. Lindsay J, Solomon E, Nadeem M, Pakzad M,Hamid R, Ockrim J, et al. Treatment validationof the Solomon-Greenwell nomogram for femalebladder outlet obstruction. Neurourology andUrodynamics. 2020;39(5):1371–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24347




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2022;82