medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

1999, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 1999; 56 (1)

Comparison between bioresorbable and non-resorbable membranes in the guided tissue regenerative therapy

Zermeño IJA, Cepeda BJA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 39-43
PDF size: 103.67 Kb.


Key words:

Guided tissue regeneration, membranes.

ABSTRACT

This is a review of different options to treat patients with periodontal disease, that are selected to recive resorbable and non resorbable membranes for periodontal regeneration around natural teeth. Improved understandig of the advantages and disadvantages of GTR with this two type of materials


REFERENCES

  1. Carranza FA. Periodoncia clínica de Glickman, 7a. ed. Interamericana-McGraw-Hill.

  2. Genco-Goldman-Cohen. Periodoncia Interamericana-McGraw-Hill 1990.

  3. Lundgren D, Laurell L, Gottlow J. The influence of the design of two different bioresorbable barriers on the results of guided tissue regeneration therapy. An intra-individual comparative study in monkey. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 605-612.

  4. Hugoson A, Ravaid N, Fornell J, Johard G, Gottlow J. Treatment of class ii furcation involvements in humans with bioresorbable and nonresorbable guided tissue regeneration barriers. A randomized multicenter study. J Periodontol 1995; 66: 624-634.

  5. Hom-Lay Wang, Kuo Yuan, Burgett F. Adherence of oral microorganisms to guided tissue membranes: An in vitro study. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 211-218.

  6. Laurell L, Falk H, Fornell J, Johard G. Clinical use of a bioresorbable matrix barrier in guided tissue regeneration therapy. Case series. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 967-975.

  7. Suchada Vuddhakanok. Solt ChW. Histologic evaluation of periodontal attachment apparatus following the insertion of a biodegradable copolymer barrier in humans. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 202-210.

  8. Scantlebury TV. 1982-1992: A decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1129-1137.

  9. Lekovic V, Barrie Kenney E. Guided tissue regeneration using calcium phospate implants together with 4 different membranes. A study on furcations in dogs. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1154-1156.

  10. Gottlow J. Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and non-resorbable devices: Initial healing and long-term results. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1157-1165.

  11. Gager AH, Schultz AJ. Treatment of periodontal defects with an absorbable membrane (polyglactin 910) with and without osseous grafting: Case reports. J Periodontol 1991; 62: 276-283.

  12. Shmalz CM, Wenzel RE. Clinical and radiographical splitmouth- study on resorbable versus non-resorbable GTRmembranes. J Clin Periodontol 1995: 22: 306-315.

  13. Pontoriero LJ, Araujo BT. The effect of flap management and bioresorbable occlusive devices in GTR treatment of degree III furcation defects. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1995: 22: 276-283.

  14. Quiteish D, Dolby AE. The use of irradiated-crosslinked human collagen membrane in guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1992; 19: 476-484.

  15. Pitrola GP, Waite I, Doyle C, Smith R. Histological evaluation of biodegradable and non-degradable membranes placed transcutaneously in rats. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18: 581-586.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 1999;56