medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-297X (Print)

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Estomatol 2021; 58 (3)

Peri-implant mucositis associated to corrective orthodontics

Díaz-Caballero A, Lozada-Martínez A, Almanza-Moreno D

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 266.14 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Orthodontic miniscrews are temporary anchorage devices widely used in corrective orthodontics. However, it has been reported in the literature that their clinical success rate is not high, due to failures related to the loss of stability. Anchorage may be affected by factors associated to the type of implant, its surgical management and the host. Host-related factors include peri-implant tissue inflammation or mucositis, which though reversible, its early treatment is necessary to prevent expansion into and damage to the hard tissue (peri-implantitis).
Objective: Describe a clinical case of peri-implant mucositis associated to a temporary orthodontic anchorage device.
Case presentation: A female patient attends clinical consultation with pain in the anterior zone of her upper maxilla. Intraoral examination revealed the presence of orthodontic appliances with an anchorage mechanism: two orthodontic miniscrews located at the level of the upper canines. Surgical removal was performed of the orthodontic miniscrews, antibiotics were indicated and histopathological testing was conducted to rule out malignancy. The patient was diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis.
Conclusions: Surgical removal of orthodontic miniscrews is an excellent alternative to prevent the progress of the lesion into hard tissues. Pain signs, reddening and bleeding were all eliminated with the technique applied.


REFERENCES

  1. Andrucioli MCD, Matsumoto MAN, Saraiva MCP, Feres M, Figueiredo LC de, Sorgi CA, et al. Successful and failed mini-implants: microbiological evaluation and quantification of bacterial endotoxin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26: e20170631. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-063

  2. Yanaguizawa MS, Suzuki SS, Martinez EF, Suzuki H, Pelegrin MCJ, Garcez AS. Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Orthodontic Patients on Immediate Inflammatory Response After Mini-Implants Insertion: A Preliminary Report. Surg de láser fotomed. 2017;35(1):57-63. PMID: 27813716

  3. Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D. Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Orthod. 2018;40(5):519-30. PMID: 29315365

  4. Uesugi S, Kokai S, Kanno Z, Ono T. Prognosis of primary and secondary insertions of orthodontic miniscrews: What we have learned from 500 implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2017;152(2):224-31. PMID: 28760284

  5. Uesugi S, Kokai S, Kanno Z, Ono T. Stability of secondarily inserted orthodontic miniscrews after failure of the primary insertion for maxillary anchorage: Maxillary buccal area vs midpalatal suture area. Am J Orthod Dentofac. 2018;153(1):54-60. PMID: 29287652

  6. Salvi GE, Cosgarea R, Sculean A. Prevalence and Mechanisms of Peri-implant Diseases. J Dent Res. 2017;96(1):31-7. PMID: 27680028

  7. Garg K, Gupta M. Assessment of stability of orthodontic mini-implants under orthodontic loading: A computed tomography study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(3):237. PMID: 26275187

  8. Azeem M, Haq AU, Awaisi ZH, Saleem MM, Tahir MW, Liaquat A. Failure rates of miniscrews inserted in the maxillary tuberosity. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019;24(5):46-51. PMID: 31721946

  9. Aly SA, Alyan D, Fayed MS, Alhammadi MS, Mostafa YA. Success rates and factors associated with failure of temporary anchorage devices: A prospective clinical trial. J Invest Clin Dent. 2018;9(3):e12331. PMID: 29512336

  10. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A Prospective Study of the Risk Factors Associated with Failure of Mini-implants Used for Orthodontic Anchorage. Int J Oral Max Impl. 2004;19(1):100-6. PMID: 14982362

  11. Chaddad K, Ferreira AndréFH, Geurs N, Reddy MS. Influence of Surface Characteristics on Survival Rates of Mini-Implants. Angle Orthod. 2008 [acceso: 02/04/2020]; 78(1):107-13. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article/78/1/107/58672/Influence-of-Surface-Characteristics-on-Survival

  12. Lai T-T, Chen M-H. Factors affecting the clinical success of orthodontic anchorage: Experience with 266 temporary anchorage devices. J. Dent Sci. 2014 [acceso: 02/04/2020]; 9(1):49-55. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790213000317

  13. Jing Z, Wu Y, Jiang W, Zhao L, Jing D, Zhang N, et al. Factors Affecting the Clinical Success Rate of Miniscrew Implants for Orthodontic Treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(4):835-41. PMID: 27447150

  14. Tortamano A, Dominguez GC, Haddad ACSS, Nunes FD, Nacao M, Morea C. Periodontopathogens around the surface of mini-implants removed from orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(4):591-5. PMID: 22839769

  15. Apel S, Apel C, Morea C, Tortamano A, Dominguez GC, Conrads G. Microflora associated with successful and failed orthodontic mini-implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(11):1186-90. PMID: 19719743




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com