medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2021; 34 (3)

Results of the minimally invasive surgery in patient with horizontal strabismus

Méndez STJ, Liu M, Naranjo FRM, Casanueva CH, Hernández SLR

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 1-23
PDF size: 554.99 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: Determine the results of minimally invasive surgery in patients with horizontal strabismus.
Methods: A prospective longitudinal descriptive study was conducted of a series of 19 patients (16 right eyes, 17 left eyes) attending the Pediatric Ophthalmology Service at Ramón Pando Ferrer Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from June 2018 to July 2019. These patients underwent minimally invasive strabismus surgery and were followed up for six months. The variables considered were deviation type, visual acuity, postoperative signs, pre- and postoperative angle of deviation, surgical success, fusion, stereopsis and complications.
Results: Of the patients studied, 73.7% presented esotropias; mean pre- and postoperative visual acuity was very similar in the two eyes; the most common postoperative sign was slight conjunctival hyperemia (75% right eyes and 64.5% left eyes) at 24 hours. Statistical differences (p < 0.001) were found in the horizontal angle of deviation in pre- and postoperative prism diopters, with 84.2% surgical success. 78.6% and 80% of the patients with esotropia and exotropia achieved fusion, but only 28.5 and 60% of them, respectively, achieved stereopsis. Complications occurred in 15.8% of the patients.
Conclusions: Good motor results were obtained, as well as acceptable sensory results in patients undergoing minimally invasive horizontal strabismus surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular vision and ocular motility: Theory and management of strabismus. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby; 2002.

  2. Helveston EM. Surgical Management of Strabismus. Belgium: Wayenborgh Publishing; 2005.

  3. Méndez Sánchez TJ, Casanueva Cabeza HC, Naranjo Fernández RM, Hernández Perugorría A, Hernández Santos LR, Pons Castro L. Cirugía de estrabismo mínimamente invasiva. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019 [acceso: 01/09/2018];32(3):781. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0864-21762019000300009

  4. Mikel M, Rhiannon V, Forough F, Kourosh S. Choice of conjunctival incisions for horizontal rectus muscle surgery (a survey of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus members. J AAPOS. 2013;17:184-18. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.11.015

  5. Mojon DS. Comparison of a new, minimally invasive strabismus surgery technique with the usual limbal approach for rectus muscle recession and plication. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(1):76-82. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.153650

  6. Mojon DS. Minimally Invasive Strabismus Surgery. Europ Ophth Rev. 2011;5(1):27-32. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17925/eor.2011.05.01.27

  7. Mojon DS. Minimally invasive strabismus surgery. Eye (London). 2015 [acceso: 01/09/2018];29:225-33. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330290/

  8. Asproudis I, Kozeis N, Katsanos A, Jain S, Tranos Paris G, Konstas A, Georgios PA. Review of Minimally Invasive Strabismus Surgery (MISS): Is This the Way Forward? Adv Ther. 2017;34:826-33. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0498-7

  9. Merino P, Blanco Domínguez I, Gómez de Liaño P. Outcomes of minimally invasive strabismus surgery for horizontal deviation. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2016;91:69-73. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2015.11.002

  10. Merino Sanz P, Gómez de Liaño Sánchez P, Blanco Domínguez I. Minimally Invasive Strabismus Surgery (MISS) compared with the Fornix Approach in Pediatric Horizontal Strabismus Surgery. Strabismus. 2015;23(4):159-63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3109/09273972.2015.1102296

  11. Gupta P, Dadeya S, Kamlesh Bhambhawani V. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Strabismus Surgery (MISS) and Conventional Strabismus Surgery Using the Limbal Approach. J Ped Ophthalmol Strab. 2017;54(4):208-15. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20170321-01

  12. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (2018-2019 Basic and Clinical Science Course). San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2018.

  13. Estévez Miranda Y, Naranjo Fernández RM, Casanueva Cabeza H. Esodesviaciones en la infancia. En: Río Torres M; Fernández Aragonés L, Hernández Silva JR, Ramos López M. Oftalmología: Diagnóstico y tratamiento. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2018. p. 217-20.

  14. Kushner Burton J. Strabismus. Practical Pearls you won´t find in text books. Switzerland: Springer; 2017.

  15. Sharma R, Amitava Abadan K, Bani Sadat AO. Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus paralimbal approach: A randomized, parallel design study is minimally invasive strabismus surgery worth the effort? Ind J Ophthalmol. 2014 [acceso: 09/01/2018];62:508-11. DOI: DOI: http://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.118448

  16. Adel Abdel-Rahman O, Abdallah Hussein H, Abdel-Mongy El-Sayed A, Abdel-Ghany Ali E. Minimally Invasive Strabismus Surgery for Horizontal Concomitant Strabismus. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;73(10):7737-45. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2015.11.002

  17. Pellanda N, Mojon DS. Combined horizontal rectus muscle minimally invasive strabismus surgery for exotropía. Can J Ophthalmol. 2010;45:363-7. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3129/i10-016

  18. Badawi MN. Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus fornix-based incision technique. Delta J Ophthalmol. 2018;19(2):153-8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4103/DJO.DJO_56_17

  19. Kyung Tae K, Se Youp L. Relationship between Control Grade, Stereoacuity and Surgical Success in Basic Intermittent Exotropia. Kor J Ophthalmol. 2015;29(3):173-7. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2015.29.3.173

  20. Magli A, Carelli R, Matarazzo F, Bruzzese D. Essential infantile esotropia: postoperative motor outcomes and inferential analysis of strabismus surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:35-43. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-35

  21. Méndez Sánchez TJ. Maldonado Gálvez EA, Hernández Santos LR, Naranjo Fernández RM, Hernández Silva JR, Padilla González C. Visión binocular en pacientes operados de esotropía congénita con cuatro años de evolución. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2016 [acceso: 09/01/2018];29(1): Disponible en: http://www.revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/419

  22. Gole Glen A, Camuglia Jayne E. Infantile esotropías. In: Taylor D, Hoyt CS, editors. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. London: Elsevier Saunders; 2017. p. 796-8.

  23. Weakley DR, Mota Pereira E. Accommodative esotropías In: Taylor D, Hoyt CS, editors. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. London: Elsevier Saunders; 2017. p. 802-5.

  24. Jacobs SM, Green-Simms A, Diehl NN, Mohney BG. Long-term follow-up of acquired non accommodative esotropia in a population-based cohort. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(6): 1170-4. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.017

  25. Kaup M, Stefania M, Mojon A, Kunz A, Mojon DS. Intraoperative conversion rate to a large, limbal opening in minimally invasive strabismus surgery (MISS). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1553-7. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1707-8




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com