medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica de Cuba

ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Acta Médica 2021; 22 (4)

Residual refractive defects and their associated factors in patients with high myopia due to phacoemulsification

Ballate NEM, Novoa SE, Pérez GD, Sosa GI, Llanos GEJ, Tamargo BTO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page:
PDF size: 175.21 Kb.


Key words:

phacoemulsification, high myopia, visual acuity, spherical residual defect, astigmatism.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Myopia is an ametropia with high prevalence rate, so it is very important to have safe, stable and predictable treatments for precise correction.
Objective: To evaluate residual refractive errors and their associated factors in patients with high myopia with a phacoemulsification surgical technique in the most curved meridian.
Methods: Prospective descriptive study in 31 patients (44 eyes), with high myopia, with intraocular lens implantation and candidates for phacoemulsification surgery in the Ophthalmology Service at Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical Surgical Hospital from January 2018 to January 2020. The study variables were sphere, astigmatism, axial length, and objective and subjective satisfaction.
Results: The mean age was 51.8 years and the females predominated. The sphere and cylinder in both eyes showed significant differences (p <0.001) between the pre and postoperative means. Axial length and preoperative astigmatism influenced the postoperative sphere value as independent variables. Most of the patients expressed satisfaction with the postoperative visual result.
Conclusions: The associated factors that independently influenced the postoperative sphere value were axial length and preoperative astigmatism. The residual spherical defect was in the optimal range, which generated high degree of satisfaction in the patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Melles R, Holladay J, Chang W. Accurancy of Intraocular Lens CalculationFormulas. Ame Acad Ophthal. 2017. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.02

  2. Pérez D, González F, Rey F, Parra I, Villegas M, Ballate E. Facoemulsificación eimplante de lente intraocular para la corrección de la alta miopía. Rev Acta Méd.2014 [acceso: 20/05/2020]:15(1). Disponible en:http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/actamedica/acm- 2014/acm141c.pdf

  3. Jeong J, Song H, Lee JK, Chuck RS, Kwon JW. The effect of ocular biometricfactors on the accuracy of various IOL power calculation formulas. BMC Ophthal.2017 [acceso: 28/08/2021];17(1):62. Disponible en:https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=3.%09Jeong+J%2C+Song+H%2C+Lee+JK%2C+Chuck+RS%2C+Kwon+JW.+The+effect+of+ocular+biometric+factors+on+the+accuracy+of+various+IOL+power+calculation+formulas.+BMC+ophthalmology.+2017+Dec%3B+17%281%29%3A62&btnG=

  4. Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula. Journal Cataract Ref Surgery. 2008 [acceso: 28/08/2021];34(10):1658-63. Disponible en:https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=4.%09Haigis+W.+Intraocular+lens+calculation+after+refractive+surgery+for+myopia%3A+Haigis-L+formula.+Journal+Cataract+Ref+Surgery+2008%3B+34%2810%29%3A1658-1663&btnG=

  5. Yang Q, Chen B, Peng G, Li Z, Huang Y. Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasoundbiometry in high myopic patients with cataract. Chin Journal Ophthal. 2014[acceso: 28/08/2021];50(1):32-6. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24709131

  6. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens CalculationFormulas. Ophthal. 2018 [acceso: 28/08/2021];125:169-78. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28951074/

  7. Welch G, Cruz M, Escalona MJ, Fundora V. Facoemulsificación en la cirugía decatarata. Rev Cubana Oftalm. 2017 [acceso: 28/08/2021];46(3). Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=6.+Melles+RB%2C+Holladay+JT%2C+Chang+WJ.+Accuracy+of+Intraocular+Lens+Calculation+Formulas.+Ophthalmology.+2018%3B+125%3A169-welch+Ruiz+G%2C+Cruz+Blanco+M%2C+Escalona+Tamayo+MJ%2C+Fundora+Salgado+V.+Facoemulsificaci%C3%B3n+en+la+cirug%C3%ADa+de+catarata.+Rev+Cubana+2017%3B46%283%29%3A

  8. Choi JH, Lim DH, Nam SW, Yang CM, Chung ES, Chung TY. Ten-year clinicaloutcomes after implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens formyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(11):1555-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.06.015

  9. Cionni Md, Snyder Md, Osher H. Cataract Surgery. 3ra. ed. New York: Elsevier.

  10. Çağatay HH, Ekinci M, Gökçe G, Odabaşı M, Daraman Ö. Clinical Outcomes ofPhacoemulsification and intraocular Lens Implantation in Eyes with High Myopia.Med J Bakirkoy. 2015[acceso:28/08/2021];11(1):13-6. Disponible en:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=6.+Melles+RB%2C+Holladay+JT%2C+Chang+WJ.+Accuracy+of+Intraocular+Lens+Calculation+Formulas.+Ophthalmology.+2018%3B+125%3A169-

  11. Abolhasani A, Heidari M, Shojaei A, Khoee SH, Rafati M, Moradi A. Clear LensExtraction for Correction of High Myopia. J Ophtal Optom Sci. 2017;1(2):9-14.Disponible en: PubMed: PMID: 27313161

  12. Lam JK, Chan TC, Ng AL, Chow VW, Wong VW, Jhanji V. Outcomes of cataractoperations in extreme high axial myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.2016;254(9):1811-7. Disponible en: PubMed: PMID: 27313161

  13. Chang JS, Chan VK, Ng JC, Law AK. Visual Performance after BilateralImplantation of a Four-Haptic Diffractive Toric Multifocal Intraocular Lens in HighMyopes. J Ophthal. 2016;53(2):105. Disponible en: PubMed: PMID: 27563460

  14. Nikose AS, Saha D, Laddha PM, Patil M. Surgically induced astigmatism afterphacoemulsification by temporal clear corneal and superior clear cornealapproach: a comparison. 2018;12:65-70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.214/OPTH.S149709

  15. Sonmez S, Karaca C. The effect of tunnel length and position on postoperativecorneal astigmatism: An optical coherence tomographic study. Eur J Ophthalmol.2020 [acceso: 28/08/2021];30(1):104-11. Disponible en:https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Sonmez+S%2C+Karaca+C.+The+effect+of+tunnel+length+and+position+on+postoperative+corneal+astigmatism%3A+An+optical+coherence+tomographic+study.+Eur+J+Ophthalmol.+2020%3B30%281%29%3A104-+11.+15.+&btnG=

  16. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Soroush S, Shariati R, Miraftab M, Yekta A. Thelocation of incision in cataract surgery and its impact on induced astigmatism. CurrOpin Ophthalmol. 2016 [acceso: 28/08/2021];27(1):58-64. Disponible en:https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=16.%09Hashemi+H%2C+Khabazkhoob+M%2C+Soroush+S%2C+Shariati+R%2C+Miraftab+M%2C+Yekta+A.+The+location+of+incision+in+cataract+surgery+and+its+impact+on+induced+astigmatism.+Curr+Opin+Ophthalmol.+2016%3B27%281%29%3A58-64.&btnG=

  17. Zhao BB. Analysis of incidence and related factors on effusion of anteriorchamber after phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation.Int Eye Sci. 2018 [acceso: 28/08/2021];18(2):282-5. Disponible en:https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=17.%09Zhao+BB.+Analysis+of+incidence+and+related+factors+on+effusion+of+anterior+chamber+after+phacoemulsification+combined+with+intraocular+lens+implantation.+Int+Eye+Sci+2018%3B+18%282%29%3A282-

  18. Cooke DL, Cooke TL. Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculationformulas. Journal Cataract & Refract Surg. 2016 [acceso: 28/08/2021];42(8):1157-64. Disponible en:https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=18.%09Cooke+DL%2C+Cooke+TL.+Comparison+of+9+intraocular+lens+power+calculation+formulas.+Journal+of+Cataract%26RefractiveSurgery.+2016+Aug.+1%3B+42%288%29%3A1157-

  19. Novoa E, Veliz GA, Pérez D, Mora I, García F, Ballate EM. Astigmatismo inducidoen la incisión en meridiano más curvo versus incisión temporal. Acta Med. 2017[acceso: 04/05/2018];18(1). Disponible en:http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/act/vol18_1_17/act04117.htm




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Acta Médica. 2021;22