medigraphic.com
Archivos de Medicina (Manizales)

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med 2022; 22 (2)

Burnout syndrome and its relationship with components of DISC theory in a commerce enterprise

Riquelme DG, Arias GW

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 253-263
PDF size: 264.92 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the Burnout syndrome has generated several researches in the last forty years considering its implications for labor health, but there are few papers that asso- ciate this construct with variables such as leadership. In this sense, the DISC theory, formulated by William Marston, and applied to the organizational context in order to explain leadership and submission behaviors. Objective: the present research has as aim to analyze the relationship between burnout syndrome and its dimensions with personality styles according to DISC theory: Dominant, Influential, Steadiness and Compliance. Method: 91 workers from a private commerce enterprise (37,4% female and 62,6% male) were assessed by the application of Burnout Maslach Inventory and the DISC Test. Results: 15,4% workers has severe level of burnout syndrome and the predominant personality was the Steady in the 34% of the sample, followed by the Influential in the 29%, the Compliance in the 26% and the Dominant in the 11%. The application of the chi square test reported that there are not a significant statistical relation between the variables of this study. Conclusion: There were no significant associations between the Burnout syndrome dimensions and leadership dimensions according to the DISC theory.


REFERENCES

  1. Sarfocada E. La salud en Indoafroiberoamerica: El paradigma necesario. Salud Soc. 2011; 2(3): 311-320.

  2. Atalaya M. El estrés laboral y su influencia en el trabajo. Ind data. 2001; 4(2): 25-36.

  3. Arias WL. Accidentabilidad laboral en Arequipa: Un estudio bibliométrico a partir de la prensa escrita desde 2000a 2009. Rev Cubana Salud Trab. 2015; 16(1): 28-37.

  4. Arias WL. Aportes de la psicología a la seguridad industrial y la salud ocupacional. Rev psicol. Arequipa. 2011;1(2): 134-143.

  5. Benavides FG, Maqueda J, Rodrigo F, Pinilla J, García AM, Ronda E, Ordaz E, Ruíz-Frutos C. Prioridades deinvestigación en salud laboral en España. Med Segur Trab. 2008; 54(211): 25-27.

  6. Gil-Monte PR. El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (burnout). Madrid: Pirámide; 2005.

  7. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52: 397-422.

  8. Freudenberger HJ. Staff burnout. Journal of Social Issues. 1974; 30: 159-165.

  9. Maslach C. Burnout. Human Behavior. 1976; 5(9): 16-22.

  10. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior. 1981;12: 99-113.

  11. Gil-Monte PR, Peiró JM. Perspectivas teóricas y modelos interpretativos para el estudio del síndrome dequemarse por el trabajo. An psicol. 1999; 15(2): 261-268.

  12. Arias WL, Jiménez NA. Estrés crónico en el trabajo: estudios del síndrome de burnout en Arequipa. Arequipa:Universidad Católica San Pablo; 2012.

  13. Leiter MP, Maslach C. The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1988; 9: 297-308.

  14. Nuckcheddy A. The effect of personality on motivation and organizational behaviour. Psychol Behav Sci Int J.2018; 9(2): 1-5.

  15. Vizcarra MA, Llaja V, Limo C, Talavera J. Clima laboral, burnout y perfil de personalidad: un estudio enpersonal asistencial de un hospital público de Lima. Inf Psicol. 2015; 15(2): 111-126.

  16. Marston WM. A theory of emotions and affection based upon systolic blood pressure studies. Am JPsychol. 1924; 35(4): 469-506.

  17. Marston WM. Emotions of normal people. New York: Hartcourt, Brace & Company; 1928.

  18. Mini F. Need DISC theory. CINDE. 2015; 36(3): 27-29.

  19. Autor colectivo. Validación del DISC. Inscape Publishing; 2005.

  20. Murati FA, Pozo JM. Apuntes críticos sobre teorías y tipologías del liderazgo organizacional. Int. Psicol.2008; 2(5): 1-11.

  21. Roldán Y, Ríos M. Tipos de liderazgo e indicadores grafológicos de la firma, en trabajadores de la empresaDamper – Trujillo SAC 2007. Rev psicol. (Trujillo). 2009; 11: 97-110.

  22. Kao RH. A study on relationship between transformational leadership and organizational climate: UsingHML to analyze context effects of Police Organization. Glo Adv Res J Manag Bus Stud. 2015; 4(3): 87-115.

  23. Ospina H. Las maestrías del líder. Rev Cienc Estrat. 2013; 22(30): 243-256.

  24. Peiró JM, Rodríguez I. Work stress, leadership and organizational health. Mental Health and Leadership.2010; 15: 88-99.

  25. Ato M, López JJ, Benavente A. Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología.An Psicol. 2013; 29(3): 1038-1059

  26. Gil-Monte PR, Peiró JM. Validez factorial del Maslach Burnout Inventory en una muestra multiocupacional.Psicothema. 1999; 11(3): 679-689.

  27. Pérez F. William Moulton Marston: polígrafos, comics y psicología de la normalidad. Rev Hist Psicol. 2010;31(2-3): 151-166.

  28. Duck J. Making the connection: Improving virtual team performance through behavioral assessment profilingand behavioral cues. Developments in Business Simulation and experimental Learning. 2006; 33: 358-359.

  29. Arias WL. Síndrome de burnout y afrontamiento. Arequipa: Adrus; 2015.

  30. Álvarez LA, López LA, Silva NE. Satisfacción labora en una organización human care de la Bahía de Guayaquil.Podium. 2019; 35: 87-96.

  31. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. La teoría de las demandas y los recursos laborales. Journal of Work and OrganizationalPsychology. 2013; 29: 107-115.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com