medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2021; 32 (4)

Mycotoxins in food analysis: A study with bibliometric indicators and visualization maps

Leon-Vasquez RAJ, Limaymanta CH

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 1-19
PDF size: 725.76 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to identify the development of scientific production by year and journal, determine the thematic structure and identify the coauthorship network of the literature about mycotoxins in food analysis. A descriptive study was conducted of documents published in the database Scopus from 2011 to 2020, using bibliometric indicators and visualization maps. A total 453 articles were included which met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 382 were research articles and 71 were reviews. The average annual number of citations per article ranged from 6 in 2019 to 40.5 in 2012. The most productive journal was Mycotoxin Research from Springer Nature publishers. The co-occurrence map displayed five descriptor clusters, whereas the co-authorship map displayed 21 clusters, 14 of which corresponded to authors researching in co-authorship. Scientific development had a non-uniform, slowly growing annual output. The thematic structure according to the co-occurrence network shows that the most frequent term is "mycotoxins", corresponding to mycotoxins influencing public health from the first cluster. The co-authorship network shows that 98.2% of the articles were co-authored, and the most productive author was Krska Rudolf, from Queen's University, Belfast, with 24 articles.


REFERENCES

  1. Onyeke CC. Review of mycotoxins in foods in Nigeria. Food Cont. 2020;118.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107376

  2. Buszewska-Forajta M. Mycotoxins, invisible danger of feedstuff with toxiceffect on animals. Toxicon. 2020;182:34–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.04.101

  3. Haque MA, Wang Y, Shen Z, Li X, Saleemi MK, He C. Mycotoxin contaminationand control strategy in human, domestic animal and poultry: A review. MicrobPathog. 2020;142:104095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104095

  4. Kyei NNA, Boakye D, Gabrysch S. Maternal mycotoxin exposure and adversepregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. Mycot Res. 2020;36(2):243–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-019-00384-6

  5. Bennett JW, Klich M. Mycotoxins. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003 [acceso:20/11/2021];16(3):497-516. Disponible en:http://cmr.asm.org/content/16/3/497.abstract

  6. Yang C, Song G, Lim W. Effects of mycotoxin-contaminated feed on farmanimals. J Hazard Mater; 2020;389:122087. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122087

  7. Singh J, Mehta A. Rapid and sensitive detection of mycotoxins by advancedand emerging analytical methods: A review. Food Sci Nutr. 2020;8(5):2183-204.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1474

  8. Gregorio-Chaviano O, Limaymanta C, López-Mesa E. Análisis bibliométrico dela producción científica latinoamericana sobre COVID-19. Biomédica. 2020[acceso: 20/11/2021];40(Supl. 2):1–12. Disponible en:https://revistabiomedica.org/index.php/biomedica/article/view/5571

  9. Chin Roemer R, Borchardt R. Meaningful Metrics: A 21st-Century Librarian’sGuide to Bibliometrics, Altmetrics, and Research Impact. Asociation of Collegeand Research Libraries; 2015.

  10. Van Eck, NJ, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Measuringscholarly impact: Methods and practice. Basel: Springer; 2014. p. 285–320.

  11. Lazcano-Peña D, Reyes-Lillo D. Redes académicas en la investigación enComunicación en Chile: análisis de co-autorías en el trabajo científico. Rev EspDoc Cient. 2020 [acceso: 20/11/2021];43(1):259. Disponible en:https://redc.revistas.csic.es/index.php/redc/article/view/1065

  12. Romani F. Análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones científicas originales delInstituto Nacional de Salud del Perú en el periodo 1998-2018. Rev Per Med ExpSalud Publica. 2020 [acceso: 20/11/2021];37(2):195–202. Disponible en:http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-46342020000300485

  13. Osma ER. Aplicación del modelo bradford en la producción científica del áreabiomédica de la Universidad de Granada (1988-1996). Encont Bibli Rev EletrBibliot Ciênc Inform. 2007;11(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2006v11nesp2p1

  14. Sisa I, Espinel M, Fornasini M, Mantilla G. La producción científica en cienciasde la salud en Ecuador. Rev Panam Salud Publ/Pan Am J Public Health. 2011[acceso: 20/11/2021];30(4):388–92. Disponible en:https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/9508

  15. González MID, González PD. ¿Se ajustan las ventanas fijas de citación a lasvelocidades de maduración del impacto de las revistas científicas? Investig Bibl.2016;30(68):73–89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.02.004

  16. Eze UA, Routledge MN, Okonofua FE, Huntriss J, Gong YY. Mycotoxinexposure and adverse reproductive health outcomes in Africa: A review. WorldMycotoxin J. 2018;11(3):321–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/WMJ2017.2261

  17. Olivera D, Peralta M, García O. La coautoría como expresión de lacolaboración en la producción científica de Camagüey. Biblios. 2018 [acceso:20/11/2021];(70):1-16. Disponible en:http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/423




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com