medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología

ISSN 1561-3062 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2021; 47 (4)

Abdominal foreign body extraction through combined gynecological endoscopic procedures

Castillo SY, Díaz OI, López MAB, Barrera GJE, Pereira FJG, Quintana PI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page:
PDF size: 537.70 Kb.


Key words:

minimally invasive surgical procedures, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, strange body.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Combined gynecological endoscopic procedures are a technical advance in minimally invasive approaches, which interrelate the advantages of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. These procedures expand the use of minimally invasive surgery and improve safety, precision and efficacy in the treatment of gynecological pathologies.
Objective: To report clinical case to which gynecological endoscopic procedures combined for the extraction of a foreign body in the same surgical time were performed.
Case report: This is the case of a 36 -year -old patient, assisted in the Gynecology Service at National Center for Minimum Access Surgery, Havana, Cuba. She had pelvic pain and intermittent transvaginal bleeding after evacuation of the uterine cavity of an unwanted pregnancy, by menstrual regulation method, there was high suspicion of fractured cannula. Hysteroscopic procedure is performed which revealed abundant endometrial cavity inflammatory tissue (endometritis) and hemorrhagic-looking tissue. Several biopsies were taken. There was no foreign body in uterine cavity. For high probability of the cannula fracture, the diagnostic-therapy laparoscopy was carried out at the same surgical time, and it was found fractured aspiration cannula at the distal end, fragment of approximately 4 cm, which was extracted. The patient was discharged with satisfactory evolution.
Conclusions: Combined gynecological endoscopic procedures are feasible, safe, effective and beneficial methods for simultaneous surgical procedures in the same operative act.


REFERENCES

  1. Zhang Z, Wang W, Wang L. Application of combined laparoscopic endoscopic procedures in the treatment of colorectal neoplasms. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 [acceso 09/07/2020];18(6):540-3. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26108763/

  2. López Milhet AB, Castillo Sánchez Y, Roque González R, Pereira Fraga JG, Barreras González J, Morera Pérez M. Experiencia en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso sobre procedimientos asociados en cirugía laparoscópica. Rev Cubana Cir. 2015 Dic [acceso 09/07/2020];54(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932015000400008&lng=es

  3. Faife Faife BC, Barreras González JE, González León T, Torres Peña RC, Olivé González JB. Consideraciones generales sobre los procedimientos asociados en la cirugía laparoscópica. Rev Cubana Cir. 2012 Jun [acceso 09/07/2020];51(2):201-8. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932012000200009&lng=es

  4. Labastida NR. Tratado y Atlas de Histeroscopia. Madrid: Editorial Salvat; 1990.

  5. Sánchez-Boccaccio Ch, Brito-Pérez MA. Extracción de cuerpos extraños intrauterinos. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2007 Dic [acceso 09/07/2020];67(4):233-7. Disponible en: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0048-77322007000400004&lng=es

  6. O'Hanlan KA, Westphal LM. First report of a vaginal foreign body perforating into the retroperitoneum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:962-4.

  7. Li C, Tang S, Gao X, Lin W, Han D, Zhai J, et al. Efficacy of combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum: a retrospective analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 [acceso 13/07/2020];2016:1765624. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811045/

  8. Valenzuela P. Removal of a fetal scalp electrode lodged in the vagina of a patient for 23 years. J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;26(7):704-5.

  9. Perucca P Ernesto, Reyes S Marcelo, Diez C María José, Veloz T Marcela. Cuerpo extraño intravaginal secundario a migración de aguja de osteosíntesis de cadera. Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol. 2007 [acceso 13/07/2020];72(6):412-3. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-75262007000600010&lng=es

  10. Fajardo Tornés Y, Proenza Macías J, Malcom Suárez A, Aguilar Estrada J. Cuerpo extraño cervical. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol. 2009 Dic [acceso 10/07/2020];35(4):145-9. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2009000400016&lng=es

  11. Fernández Gómez A, Norbert Milanés A, Sánchez Menéndez A, Hernández García A. Migración de un dispositivo intrauterino al ovario: presentación de un caso. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol. 2011 Jul-sep;37(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2011000300013




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2021;47