medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica

Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2023; 21 (3)

Double or modified Rintala flap in the reconstruction of defects of the nasal dorsum. Case report

Soto OJA, Gálvez JYA, Sánchez MEC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 237-240
PDF size: 168.02 Kb.


Key words:

Rintala flap, double or modified Rintala flap, basocelular carcinoma.

ABSTRACT

Defects of the nasal dorsum secondary to oncological surgery have various reconstruction options, such as direct closure, grafts, or flaps of multiple designs. For defects of 1.5 to 2.5 cm, the upper-based Rintala flap has been used as a suitable option, as it has the advantage of preserving the integrity of the esthetic subunits. The modified Rintala flap, by adding skin from the lower portion, allows us to close even more significant defects since it is a double advancement flap that preserves the integrity of the cosmetic subunits. We present the case of a 71-year-old patient with an infiltrating basal cell carcinoma in the dorsum of the nose, which resolved favorably with this technique.


REFERENCES

  1. Burget GS y Menik FJ, The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction,Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76(2):239-47.

  2. Baker SR, Local flaps in facial reconstruction, Filadelfia, ElsevierSaunders, 2014.

  3. Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP Jr y Hollier RH, The aestheticunit dorsal nasal flap: rationale for avoiding a glabelar incision,Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104(5):1289-94.

  4. Rintala AE y Asko-Seljavaara S, Reconstruction of mid-lineskin defects of the nose, Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg 1969;3(2):105-8.

  5. Chiu LD, Hybarger CP y Todes-Taylor N, The Rintala flap revisted,Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94(6):801-7.

  6. Ebrahimi A, Nejadsarvari N y Koushky ES, Application of modifiedRintala flap in nasal tip reconstruction, Am J Otolaryngol2012; 33(6):685-8.

  7. Motamedi KK, Shivan HA, DeJoseph LM y Silver WE, Aestheticmodification to the Rintala flap: a case series, Aesthetic PlastSurg 2014; 38:395-8.

  8. Larrabe WF Jr y Sherris DA, Principles of facial reconstruction,Filadelfia, Lipincott-Raven, 1995.

  9. Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Ansari M, Beran SJ y Potter JK, Nasalreconstruction beyond aesthetic subunits: 15 years review of1334 cases, Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 114(6):1405-16.

  10. Woodard CR y Park SS, Reconstruction of nasal defects 1.5 cmo smaller, Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13(2):91-6.

  11. Park SS, Reconstruction of nasal defects larger than 1.5 cm indiameter, Laryngoscope 2000; 110(8):1241-50.

  12. Collar RM, Ward PD y Baker SR, Reconstructive perspectives ofcutaneous defects involving the nasal tip, Arch Facial Plast Surg2011; 13(2):91-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica. 2023;21