medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2023, Number 48

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2023; 12 (48)

Oral presentation in class, teacher vs. student: Effects on the retention of group knowledge

Camberos-Barraza J, Camacho-Zamora A, Valdez-Flores MA, Angulo-Rojo CE, Guadrón-Llanos AM, Osuna-Ramos JF, Rábago-Monzón ÁR, Picos-Cárdenas VJ, González-García LA, De la Herrán-Arita AK

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 80-96
PDF size: 489.57 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The oral presentation in class is a valuable tool for the individual student, which allows him to share knowledge and demonstrate understanding of a topic. The quality and effectiveness of the presentation can vary widely depending on various factors, such as experience and communication skills. On the other hand, the teacher has greater experience and knowledge in the subject they teach due to their academic training and practical experience, as well as a greater ability to explain and teach knowledge in an effective and structured way. These differences in the level of knowledge between teacher and student sometimes represent a problem regarding group learning on the subject that is being exposed.
Objective: Characterize the differences between the oral presentations of teacher and student over group learning, with the purpose of identifying areas in which teaching methods can be improved.
Methods: 140 second-year students of the General Physician career participated, randomly assigned to two experimental conditions (teacher vs. group vs. student vs. group), which were subjected to learning and test tests. Subsequently, the cognitive load, performance and ef- ficiency were measured.
Results: Learning is superior when the teacher gives an oral presentation of a complex cognitive task if performance is measured in transfer problems. On the other hand, learning is better when the student gives the oral presentation if the performance is measured in retention problems.
Conclusions: The oral presentation given by the teacher has a positive effect on deep group learning of complex cognitive tasks.


REFERENCES

  1. Espada M, Navia JA, Rocu P, Gómez-López M. Developmentof the Learning to Learn Competence in the UniversityContext: Flipped Classroom or Traditional Method? ResLearn Technol. 2020;28. doi:10.25304/rlt.v28.2251

  2. Fernández-Batanero JM, Román-Graván P, Montenegro-Rueda M, López-Meneses E, Fernández-Cerero J. Digitalteaching competence in higher education: A systematic review.Educ Sci. 2021;11(11):689. doi:10.3390/educsci11110689

  3. Sevillano-Monje V, Martín-Gutiérrez Á, Hervás-Gómez C.The flipped classroom and the development of competences:A teaching innovation experience in higher education. EducSci. 2022;12(4):248. doi:10.3390/educsci12040248

  4. Živković S. The importance of oral presentations for universitystudents. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2014;5(19):468. doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p468

  5. Moreno EM, Montilla-Arechabala C, Maldonado MA. Effectivenessand characteristics of programs for developingoral competencies at university: A systematic review. CogentEduc. 2022;9(1):2149224. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2022.2149224

  6. Penrose RB. Increasing Student Self-Efficacy: A Case forAssigning Oral Communication Activities before WrittenAssignments. Coll Teach. 2022;1-8. doi:10.1080/87567555.2022.2104195

  7. El-Hashash A. Weekly quizzes reinforce student learningoutcomes and performance in biomedical sciences in-courseassessments. Open J Educ Res. 2022;168-178. doi: 10.31586/ojer.2022.273

  8. Cormier C, Langlois S. Enjoyment and Self-Efficacy in OralScientific Communication Are Positively Correlated toPostsecondary Students’ Oral Performance Skills. Educ Sci.2022;12(7):466. doi:10.3390/educsci12070466

  9. De Grez L, Valcke M, Roozen I. The impact of an innovativeinstructional intervention on the acquisition of oralpresentation skills in higher education. Comput Educ.2009;53(1):112-120. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.005

  10. Carless D, Winstone N. Teacher feedback literacy and itsinterplay with student feedback literacy. Teach High Educ.2023;28(1):150-163. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372

  11. Han Y, Xu Y. The development of student feedback literacy:the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. AssessEval High Educ. 2020;45(5):680-696. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545

  12. Chien SY, Hwang GJ. A question, observation, and organisation-based SVVR approach to enhancing students’ presentationperformance, classroom engagement, and technologyacceptance in a cultural course. Br J Educ Technol.2022;53(2):229-247. doi:10.1111/bjet.13159

  13. Mulder M. Conceptions of professional competence. InternationalHandbook of Research in Professional and Practice-Based Learning. 2014;107-137. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5

  14. Joughin G. Student conceptions of oral presentations. Stud HighEdu. 2007;32(3):323-336. doi: 10.1080/03075070701346873

  15. van Ginkel S, Gulikers J, Biemans H, Mulder M. Towards aset of design principles for developing oral presentation competence:A synthesis of research in higher education. EducRes Rev. 2015;14,62-80. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.002

  16. Warmuth KA, Caple AH. Differences in instructor, presenter,and audience ratings of PechaKucha and traditionalstudent presentations. Teach Psychol. 2022;49(3):224-235.doi:10.1177/00986283211006389




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com