medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-8723 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-888X (Print)
TIP Revista Especializada en Ciencias Químico-Biológicas

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

TIP Rev Esp Cienc Quim Biol 2022; 25 (1)

Morphometric characterization and reproductive potential of Mexican Creole chicken’s eggs (Gallus gallus domesticus) intended for artificial incubation

Illescas-Cobos AA, González-Cerón F, Pro-Martínez A

Language: English
References: 24
Page: 1-9
PDF size: 224.77 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The Creole Mexican chickens present a wide variation of their morphometric characteristics that go from the shape of the bird to the shape, weight, and size of the eggs they lay, offering different biological-productive values. This research consisted of describing the morphometric parameters of their eggs, and their reproductive potential under artificial incubation. For this, 2,778 eggs were collected from an experimental population of the Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, of which the measures corresponding to the macrostructure were recorded and were studied through multivariate cluster analysis. 2,671 eggs were placed for artificial incubation, distributed in eight blocks, and their development was described by embryodiagnostic analysis. As a result of the cluster, a dendrogram with three groups was obtained, group 2 grouped most of the data and could be considered as the morphometric standard with average measurements of weight = 55.96 g, length = 5.72 cm, width = 4.18 cm, egg shape index = 73, volume = 51.09 cm3, area 67.48 cm2 and color on the Zinpro® scale = 5. A fertility percentage of 76.46% and a birth percentage of 21.61% were achieved through artificial incubation.


REFERENCES

  1. Aldenderfer, M. S. & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis.Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications inthe Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, USA, Sage Publications.7-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983648

  2. Ángel-Hernández, A., Morales-Flores, S., Carrillo-Rodríguez,J. C., Rodríguez-Ortiz, G., Villegas-Aparicio, Y. & Jerez,M. (2014). Historia, domesticación y situación actual delguajolote (Meleagris gallopavo gallopavo) en México.Universidad y Ciencia, 2, 132-143. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0186-29792011000300009&lng=es&nrm=iso

  3. Camacho-Escobar, M. A., Lezama-Núñez, P. M., Jerez-Salas, M.P., Kollas, J., Vásquez-Dávila, M. A., García-López, J. C.,Arrollo-Ledezma, J., Ávila-Serrano, N. & Chávez-Cruz, F.(2011). Avicultura indígena mexicana: Sabiduría milenariaen extinción. Actas Iberoamericanas de ConservaciónAnimal, 1, 375-379.

  4. Cuca-García, J. M., Gutiérrez-Arenas, D. A. & López-Pérez,E. (2015). La avicultura de traspatio en México: Historiay caracterización. Agroproductividad, 8, 30-36. Disponibleen: https://revista-agroproductividad.org/index.php/agroproductividad/article/view/669

  5. Duman, M., Sekerog˘lu, A., Yildirim, A., Elerog˘lu, H. &Camci, Ö. (2016). Relation between egg shape index andegg quality characteristics. European Poultry Science, 80,1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1399/eps.2016.117

  6. Eleroğlu, H., Yıldırım, A., Duman, M. & Okur, N. (2016).Effect of Eggshell Color on the Egg Characteristics andHatchability of Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Eggs.Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 63, 61-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2015-0154.

  7. Etches, R. J. (1996). Reproducción aviar. Acribia. Zaragoza,España. 339p.

  8. FAO. (2012). Phenotypic Characterization of Animal GeneticResources. FAO Animal Production and Health GuidelinesNo. 11. Rome. Disponible en: https://www.fao.org/3/i2686e/i2686e00.htm

  9. González, L. J. (1999). Parámetros fisicoquímicos de la cáscarade huevo: importancia. Universidad Nacional de ColombiaSeccional Medellín, Medellín.

  10. González-Ariza A., Nogales, S., Navas-González, F.J., Delgado,J.V., León, J.M., Barba, C.J., Arando, A. & Camacho, M.E.(2020). Preliminary study of the characterization of thegrowth of the Utrerana avian breed. Actas Iberoamericanasde Conservación Animal, 4, 14-20.

  11. González-Cerón, F. (2011). Factores que determinan eldesempeño en la planta incubadora, en: Producción y manejode aves domésticas. Cuca-García et al. (eds). UniversidadAutónoma de Chapingo. México. p. 237.

  12. Grimal, A. & Gómez, E. A. (2007). Caracterización preliminarde parámetros reproductivos en la gallina de Chulilla.Archivos de Zootecnia, 56, 557-560. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49509933

  13. INAFED (Instituto Nacional para el Federalismo y Desarrollomunicipal). (2010). Enciclopedia de los Municipios ydelegaciones de México, Estado de México. Secretaría deGobernación, México. http://www.inafed.gob.mx/work/enciclopedia/EMM15mexico/municipios/15099a.html

  14. Juárez-Caratachea, A., Gutiérrez-Vázquez, E., Garcidueñas-Piña, R. & Salas-Razo, G. (2010). Producción dehuevos en gallinas criollas Cuello Desnudo (Nana) ycon emplume normal (nana) en la región del altiplanomexicano. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 44, 287-290. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=193015664012

  15. Juárez-Caratachea, A. & Ortiz, M. (2001). Estudio de laincubabilidad y crianza en aves criollas de traspatio.Veterinaria México, 32, 27-32. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42332105

  16. Morita, V. S., Boleli, I. C. & Cargnelutti, A. (2009).Hematological values and body, heart and liver weights ofmale and female broiler embryos of young and old breedereggs. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 11, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000100002

  17. NMX-FF-127-SCFI-2016. (2016). Norma Mexicana ProductosAvícolas - Huevo Fresco de Gallina – Especificaciones yMétodos de Prueba. 1-10.

  18. Paredes, M., Romero, A., Torres, M., Vallejos, L. & Mantilla, J.(2019). Crecimiento y comportamiento reproductivo de lagallina criolla de huevos con cáscara verde de la provincia deChota, Cajamarca. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinariasdel Perú, 30, 733-744. https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v30i2.16070

  19. Ricaurte, S. L. (2005) Embriodiagnosis y ovoscopía. Análisisy control de calidad de los huevos incubables. RevistaElectrónica de Veterinaria REDVET ®, 3, 1-25. Disponibleen: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63612812004

  20. Rodríguez-Ortega, L., Rodríguez-Ortega, A., Hernández-Guzmán, F., Callejas-Hernández, J., Pro-Martínez, A. &Leyva-Jiménez, H. (2020). Productive performance and eggphysical characteristics of Tufted Creole and Marans hens.Agroproductividad, 10, 69-73. https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v13i10.1741

  21. RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R.RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.

  22. Ruiz, N., Orrego, G., Reyes, M. & Silva, M. (2016). Aumentode la Temperatura de Incubación en Huevos de GallinaAraucana (Gallus inauris): Efecto sobre la MortalidadEmbrionaria, Tasa de Eclosión, Peso del Polluelo, SacoVitelino y de Órganos Internos. Int. J. Morphol., 34, 57-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022016000100009

  23. Şekeroğlu, A. & Duman, M. (2011). Effect of Egg ShellColour of Broiler Parent Stocks on Hatching Results,Chickens Performance, Carcass Characteristics, InternalOrgan Weights and Some Stress Indicators. Kafkas Univ.Vet. Fak Derg., 5, 837-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2011.4630

  24. Wilson, H. R. (1991). Interrelationship of egg size, chick size,post hatching growth and hatchability. World’s PoultryScience Journal, 47, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19910002




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com