medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Nefrología, Diálisis y Trasplante

ISSN 0326-3428 (Print)
Órgano de difusión científica de la Asociación Nefrológica de Buenos Aires
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl 2021; 41 (2)

Chronic kidney disease and clear renal cell carcinoma metastasis following radical or partial nephrectomy

Fernández P, De Arteaga J, Chiurchiu C, Douthat W, Naser S, Schwarz F, Borgogno P, Colla R, Sosa A, De La Fuente J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 82-88
PDF size: 298.76 Kb.


Key words:

renal insufficiency, chronic, nephrectomy, carcinoma, renal cell, kidney neoplasms.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Partial nephrectomy to treat early-stage renal cell carcinoma has become one of the surgeries of choice for patients in Argentina. However, long-term results in the country are unknown. In this study, we analyzed the progression to chronic kidney disease and the appearance of metastasis after partial or radical nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma patients. Methods: A retrospective, cohort study was conducted. We included all patients suffering from T1 stage clear cell renal carcinoma who, between 2006 and 2012, underwent partial nephrectomy in our hospital. Follow-up continued until January 2018. Results: Thirty-two patients were included (19 had undergone radical nephrectomy and 13, partial nephrectomy). Subjects who had radical nephrectomy showed a more rapid progression to chronic kidney disease as compared to the subjects in the partial nephrectomy group (radical nephrectomy 63.2% vs. partial nephrectomy 15.4%; p=0.007). There were no differences in the follow-up period in both groups (radical nephrectomy 69.3% ± 23.8 months vs. partial nephrectomy 72.5 ± 26.9 months; p=0.73). Risk of progression to end-stage chronic kidney disease was 11 times higher for subjects who had undergone radical nephrectomy as compared to subjects who had had partial nephrectomy (adjusted HR 11.12; 95% CI: 1.24-99.9; p=0.031), adjusted by the rest of traditional risk factors. None of the T1a patients had metastasis during follow-up, regardless of the type of surgery. Conclusion: According to the findings of our study, partial nephrectomy preserves long-term renal function better than radical nephrectomy and has an excellent oncologic safety profile in T1a stage renal cell carcinoma patients. Radical nephrectomy was an independent risk factor of progression to chronic kidney disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W. The resultsof radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.J Urol. 1969;101(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)62331-0.

  2. Patel SG, Penson DF, Pabla B, Clark PE, CooksonMS, Chang SS, et al. National trends in the use ofpartial nephrectomy: a rising tide that has not liftedall boats. J Urol. 2012;187(3):816-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.173.

  3. Bjurlin MA, Walter D, Taksler GB, Huang WC,Wysock JS, Sivarajan G, et al. National trends in theutilization of partial nephrectomy before and after theestablishment of AUA guidelines for the managementof renal masses. Urology. 2013;82(6):1283-9. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.068.

  4. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-termresults of nephron sparing surgery for localizedrenal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol.2000;163(2):442-5.

  5. Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, Thaler HT, Reuter VE, RussoP. Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm. or lessin a contemporary cohort. J Urol. 2000;163(3):730-6.

  6. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, Snyder M,Vickers AJ, Raj GV, et al. Chronic kidney diseaseafter nephrectomy in patients with renal corticaltumours: a retrospective cohort study. LancetOncol. 2006;7(9):735-40. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8.

  7. Leppert JT, Lamberts RW, Thomas IC, Chung BI,Sonn GA, Skinner EC, et al. Incident CKD afterradical or partial nephrectomy. J Am Soc Nephrol.2018;29(1):207-16. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017020136.

  8. Mashni JW, Assel M, Maschino A, Russo M, MasiB, Bernstein M, et al. New chronic kidney diseaseand overall survival after nephrectomy for small renalcortical tumors. Urology. 2015;86(6):1137-43. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.046.

  9. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE,Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks ofdeath, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. NEngl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296-305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031.

  10. Fried LF, Katz R, Sarnak MJ, Shlipak MG,Chaves PH, Jenny NS, et al. Kidney function asa predictor of noncardiovascular mortality. J AmSoc Nephrol. 2005;16(12):3728-35. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005040384.

  11. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL,Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al.; CKD-EPI (ChronicKidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A newequation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. AnnIntern Med. 2009;150(9):604-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.

  12. Rini BI, McKiernan JM, Chang SS, Amin MB,Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. Kidney. En: AJCC CancerStaging Manual. American Joint Committee onCancer, editor Mahul B. Amin. 8th ed. New York:Springer, 2017, p. 739.

  13. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognosticsignificance of morphologic parameters in renal cellcarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6(7):655-63. doi:10.1097/00000478-198210000-00007.

  14. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery forrenal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. JUrol. 2001;166(1):6-18.

  15. Russo P. Open partial nephrectomy: an essentialcontemporary operation. Nat Clin Pract Urol.2006;3(1):2-3. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0382.

  16. Liss MA, Wang S, Palazzi K, Jabaji R, Patel N, Lee HJ,et al. Evaluation of national trends in the utilization ofpartial nephrectomy in relation to the publication ofthe American Urologic Association guidelines for themanagement of clinical T1 renal masses. BMC Urol.2014;14:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-101.

  17. Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, DunnRL, Wei JT. National utilization trends of partialnephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case ofunderutilization? Urology. 2006;67(2):254-9. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.050.

  18. Pahernik S, Roos F, Röhrig B, Wiesner C, ThüroffJW. Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cellcarcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol. 2008;179(1):71-4.doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.165.

  19. Thompson RH, Siddiqui S, Lohse CM, LeibovichBC, Russo P, Blute ML. Partial versus radicalnephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors. J Urol.

  20. 2009;182(6):2601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.087.20) Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, BluteML, Chow GK, Derweesh IH, et al. Guideline formanagement of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol.2009;182(4):1271-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004.

  21. Choi SK, Song C. Risk of chronic kidney disease afternephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol.2014;55(10):636-42. doi: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.10.636.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Nefrol Dial Traspl. 2021;41