medigraphic.com

2023, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2023; 26 (1)

Academic self-regulation strategies in scholar tasks in public elementary school students from Tabasco, Mexico

Cerino SA, Flores MRC, Bracqbien NCS, García FR, Hernández FEP

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 359-382
PDF size: 540.81 Kb.


ABSTRACT

A cross-sectional study be achieved applying an instrument ex profeso designed for self-regulation abilities determination for homework autonomous realization in public elementary school students from Cardenas, Tabasco, Mexico. Six factors were identified: external regulation, self-regulated strategic actuation, activity evasion, notes use for self-regulation actuation, homework planning, and frustration in front of failure. We compared obtained results in function to gender and academic performance of students by mean of T Stundet and one way ANOVA with 95% of confidence (p=0.05). 270 students, 54.8% females and 45.2% males. Based on academic performance, 17 students were identified 17 with low performance (6.3%), 121 with medium performance (44.8%) and 132 with high performance. We observed high frustration in task in males (p‹0.05). We found significant statistically differences (p‹0.05) in the means of factors that integrate the academic selfregulation between low, medium and high-performance students. We determinate that self-regulation strategies and abilities influence over the elementary school student’s academic performance.


REFERENCES

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of thought and action: A socialcognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs N. J: Prentice Hall.

  2. Bandura, A., Cervone, D. (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanismsgoverning the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 45, 1017-1028. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1017

  3. Bembenutty, H. (2010). Meaningful and Maladaptive Homework Practices: TheRole of Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation. Journal of AdvancedAcademics, 22 (3), 448 – 473. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200304

  4. Caso, J., Vargas, L. P., Contreras, L. A., Rodríguez, J. C. y Urias, E. (2010).Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de AutorregulaciónAcadémica. Ensenada, México. Universidad Autónoma de Baja California.Recuperado de: https://docplayer.es/94522797-Propiedades-psicometricasdel-cuestionario-de-autorregulacion-academica.html

  5. Cerino S. A. (2009). Las estrategias de autorregulación académica en tareasescolares de estudiantes de secundaria de una escuela pública deTabasco [Tesis]. México D.F., México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma deMéxico.

  6. Ellis, E.S. (1991). Integrative Strategy Instruction: A potential model for teachingcontent area subjects to adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal ofLearning Disabilities, 26 (7), 360-375. Recuperado de:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002221949302600602

  7. Flores, M. R. C.; Cerino, S. A.; Mesinas, P. y Celis, Z. J. (2011). Autopercepciónde la disposición para hacer la tarea en estudiantes de secundariamexicanos. Revista Mexicana de Psicología Escolar, 2 (1), 63-74.Recuperado de:https://www.tutoriaaprendizajeadolescentes.org/autoregulacion/autotarea.pdf

  8. Flores M R. C., García B. (1999). Un modelo cognoscitivo social de Aprendizajeacadémico autorregulado. Artículo tomado de: El Desarrollo de laAutorregulación Académica. Antología para coordinadores de círculosde estudio. México: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, pág. 11-25

  9. Flores M R. y Gómez B. (2009). Un estudio sobre la motivación hacia la escuelasecundaria en estudiantes mexicanos. Revista Electrónica deInvestigación Educativa volumen, 12 (1), 1-18. Recuperado de:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S1607-40412010000100005ylng=esytlng=es.

  10. Flores M, R.C . (2008). La Promoción de la Autorregulación Académica en elaula: Manual para Docentes. México Universidad Nacional Autónoma deMéxico. Pág. 10

  11. Flores M., R. C.; Macotela F, S. (2006). Problemas de aprendizaje en laadolescencia. Experiencias en el programa Alcanzando el Éxito enSecundaria. Facultad de Psicología, UNAM.

  12. Flores, R. M. C. . (2001). Instrucción estratégica en alumnos con problemasRecuperado de:https://www.tutoriaaprendizajeadolescentes.org/autoregulacion/estrategica.pdf

  13. Oyserman, D., Bybee,D., Terry,K., Hart-Johnson T. (2004) Possible selves asroadmaps. Journal of Research in Personality, 38 (2), 130–149.Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00057-6

  14. Palincsar, A., Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal Teaching of comprehension-fosteringand comprehension-monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction. 1 (2)117-175. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1

  15. Parres, R. y Flores, M. R. C. (2010). Experiencia educativa en arte visual diseñadabajo un modelo de autorregulación del Aprendizaje con estudiantesuniversitarios. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 16 (49),597 -624. Recuperado de:http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S1405-66662011000200012ylng=esytlng=es.

  16. Pintrich P. y De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and Self-Regulated learningComponents of classroom Academic Performance. Journal of educationalPsychology, 82 (1), 33-40. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

  17. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. En M.Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich y M. Zeidner (Eds) Handbook of self-regulation.(pp. 451-502). Academic Press. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3

  18. Ponce Grima, Victor M. (2004). Reprobación y fracaso en secundaria: Hacia unareforma integral. Revista de Educación y Desarrollo, 2, 59-70.Recuperado de:https://www.cucs.udg.mx/revistas/edu_desarrollo/anteriores/2/002_Ponce.pdf

  19. Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman B.J. (1998). Self-regulated learning from teaching toself-reflective practice. The Guilford Press.

  20. Schunk, D.H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self regulated learning. En B.Zimmerman, D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and academicachievement: Theory, research and practice. Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates Publishers.

  21. Schunk, D.H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning.Educational Psychologist, 25 (1), 71-86. Recuperado de:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6

  22. Schunk, D.H. (1997). Teorías del Aprendizaje. (2da edición). Prentice Hall.

  23. Secretaria de Educación Tabasco (2009). Resultados históricos del examennacional de ingreso a la educación media superior (EXANI I)[monografía en internet]. México: SETAB. Recuperado de:http://www.setab.gob.mx/serv_edu/eval/pdf/Resultados%20EXANI-I.pdf

  24. Zimmerman y Schunk (1989). Self-regulated learning and academicachievement. Theory, Research and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4

  25. Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning andacademic learning. Journal of educational psychology, 81 (3), 329-339.Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329

  26. Zimmerman, B. J., Kitsantas, A., Campillo, M. (2005). Evaluación de laautoeficacia regulatoria: una perspectiva social cognitiva. Evaluar, 5, 1-21.Recuperado de:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/537/477

  27. Zimmerman, B.J. (2008). Investigating self regulation and motivation: historicalbackground, methodological developments, and future prospects.American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. Recuperadode: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com