medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Latin American Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

ISSN 2992-7757 (Electronic)
Órgano de difusión de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Cirugía y Traumatología Bucomaxilofacial (ALACIBU)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Lat Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 3 (2)

Prosthetic rehabilitation with zygomatic implants in a patient with sequelae of maxillectomy due to mucormycosis. Case report

López P, Romero L, Cedeno A, Bustamante G
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/113475

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/113475
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/113475

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 76-79
PDF size: 311.32 Kb.


Key words:

maxillectomy, zygomatic implants, prosthesis, mucormycosis.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: mucormycosis is the second most common invasive fungal infection and is characterized by high mortality. Its treatment is oriented to a medical and surgical phase. Block resection is usually extensive, often leading to postoperative difficulties in the patient's chewing, speaking, swallowing, articulation and breathing. With such extensive surgeries, an implant-supported prosthesis is usually required, where the use of distant bony structures such as the zygomatic bone has shown satisfactory results. Objective: to describe the surgical management of a patient with a maxillectomy secondary to mucormycosis, in which a prosthesis supported by zygomatic implants was used. Case report: 75-year-old male patient who presented with a diagnosis of sequelae of maxillectomy of infrastructure due to mucormycosis. The patient was successfully taken to the operating table under balanced general anesthesia for the placement of two bilateral zygomatic implants and 1 implant in the right infraorbital rim. Conclusion: the unusual prosthetic concept supported by zygomatic implants was successful in restoring masticatory function, significantly improved speech and restored an improved contour of the lost facial profile. Evidencing extremely encouraging results that confirm the predictability of these techniques.


REFERENCES

  1. Gaur V, Patel K, Palka L. An implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a bilateral subtotal maxillectomy defect secondary to rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis: A clinical report of a graftless approach. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128 (1): 101-106.

  2. Hackett S, El-Wazani B, Butterworth C. Zygomatic implant-based rehabilitation for patients with maxillary and mid-facial oncology defects: a review. Oral Dis. 2021; 27 (1): 27-41.

  3. Gracher AHP, de Moura MB, da Silva Peres P, Thomé G, Padovan LEM, Trojan LC. Full arch rehabilitation in patients with atrophic upper jaws with zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent. 2021; 7 (1): 17.

  4. Rosenstein J, Dym H. Zygomatic implants: a solution for the atrophic maxilla. Dent Clin North Am. 2020; 64 (2): 401-409.

  5. Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, Claros P, Alández J, González-Martín O, et al. Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontol 2000. 2014; 66 (1): 41-58.

  6. Zhou W, Fan S, Wang F, Huang W, Jamjoom FZ, Wu Y. A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 50 (1): 116-120.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Lat Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;3