medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2023, Number 11

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2023; 91 (11)

Echocardiographic variables of systolic and diastolic dysfunction in women with preeclampsia with severity criteria

Auqui VSV, Hernández PJA, Nares TMÁ, Mota CJ

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 799-804
PDF size: 211.00 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe echocardiographic values in patients with a diagnosis of preeclampsia with severity criteria.
Materials and Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study performed in patients with a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia with severity criteria. Inclusion criteria: patients older than 18 years, with a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, hospitalized in the intensive care unit between June and September 2022. Exclusion criteria: patients with heart disease or septic processes. All patients underwent echocardiography. Variables related to systolic and diastolic function were described.
Results: 20 patients were studied; 6 of them required admission to intensive care due to blood pressure higher than 160-90 mmHg. Six patients were found to have renal damage (serum creatinine greater than 1.1 mg/dL) and 4 with HELLP syndrome. Systolic dysfunction was diagnosed in 6 patients, 4 with early preeclampsia meeting the severity criteria and 2 with late preeclampsia and the same feature of systolic dysfunction. Among patients with pre-eclampsia meeting the severity criteria, 10 had diastolic dysfunction; 7 with early pre-eclampsia and 3 with late pre-eclampsia.
Conclusion: Despite the small sample size, a detailed view of systolic and diastolic function in patients with pre-eclampsia with severity criteria is provided. It shows that cardiac sonographic assessment may have significant implications for prognosis and personalized medical care for each patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Data warehouse. UNICEF DATA, 2019. https://data.unicef.org/resources/data_explorer/unicef_f/ ag=UNICEF&df=GLOBAL_DATAFLOW&ver=1.0&dq=WORLD.MNCH_MMR+MNCH_MATERNAL_DEATHS..&startPeriod 2016&endPeriod=2022

  2. Berrio Palomo LR. Redes familiares y el lugar de los varonesen el cuidado de la salud materna entre mujeres indígenasmexicanas. Salud Colect 2017; 13 (3): 471. http://dx.doi.org/10.18294/sc.2017.1137

  3. Gibbone E, Huluta I, Wright A, Nicolaides KH, CharakidaM. Maternal cardiac function at midgestation and developmentof preeclampsia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2022; 79 (1):52-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.033

  4. Wardhana MP, Dachlan EG, Dekker G. Pulmonary edema inpreeclampsia: an Indonesian case-control study. J MaternFetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31 (6): 689-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1295442

  5. Orabona R, Sciatti E, Vizzardi E, Prefumo F, Bonadei I, ValcamonicoA, et al. Inappropriate left ventricular mass afterpreeclampsia: another piece of the puzzle InappropriateLVM and PE. Hypertens Res 2019; 42 (4): 522-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41440-018-0163-9

  6. Paudel A, Tigen K, Yoldemir T, Guclu M, Yildiz I, Cincin A,et al. The evaluation of ventricular functions by speckletracking echocardiography in preeclamptic patients. Int JCardiovasc Imaging 2020; 36 (9): 1689-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01872-y

  7. Vaught AJ, Kovell LC, Szymanski LM, Mayer SA, SeifertSM, Vaidya D, et al. Acute cardiac effects of severe preeclampsia.J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72 (1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.048

  8. Da Silva WA, Pinheiro AM, Lima PH, Malbouisson LMS.Renal and cardiovascular repercussions in preeclampsiaand their impact on fluid management: a literature review.Braz J Anesthesiol 2021; 71 (4): 421-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.052

  9. San Román JA, Candell-Riera J, Arnold R, Sánchez PL,Aguadé-Bruix S, Bermejo J, et al. Análisis cuantitativo dela función ventricular izquierda como herramienta para lainvestigación clínica. Fundamentos y metodología. Rev EspCardiol 2009; 62 (5): 535-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-8932(09)71034-6

  10. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF 3rd, DokainishH, Edvardsen T, et al. Recommendations for the evaluationof left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography:An update from the American society of echocardiographyand the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. JAm Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29 (4): 277-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011

  11. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG PracticeBulletin summary, number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135 (6):1492-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003892

  12. Roberts JM, Rich-Edwards JW, McElrath TF, Garmire L,Myatt L, Global Pregnancy Collaboration. Subtypes ofpreeclampsia: Recognition and determining clinical usefulness.Hypertension 2021; 77 (5): 1430-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14781

  13. De Haas S, Spaanderman MEA, van Kuijk SMJ, van DrongelenJ, Mohseni Z, Jorissen L, et al. Adaptation of leftventricular diastolic function to pregnancy: a systematicreview and meta-analysis: A systematic review and metaanalysis.J Hypertens 2021; 39 (10): 1934-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hjh.0000000000002886

  14. Reddy M, Wright L, Rolnik DL, Li W, Mol BW, La Gerche A, etal. Evaluation of cardiac function in women with a historyof preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8 (22): e013545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.013545

  15. Badenoosh B, Yazdani S, Hossieni Gohar S, MehdizadehTourzani Z, Kabir K, Bakhtiyari M. Comparison of echocardiographicfindings in women with late preeclampsia andhealthy pregnant women: a case-control study. J MaternFetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (25): 7491-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1949707

  16. Muthyala T, Mehrotra S, Sikka P, Suri V. Maternal cardiacdiastolic dysfunction by Doppler echocardiography in womenwith preeclampsia. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10 (8): QC01-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17840.8220




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com