medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2023; 8 (4)

Comparison between patients with atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery with and without left atrial appendage excision

Huerta-Del Ángel O, Heredia-Delgado JA, Sánchez-Sánchez LM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 23
Page: 96-100
PDF size: 283.88 Kb.


Key words:

Atrial fibrillation, Left atrial appendage, excision, resection, Stroke.

Text Extraction

Background. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients older than 40 years-old, and it significantly increases the risk of stroke. In patients with atrial fibrillation, the left atrial appendage excision during cardiac surgery is one of the suggested surgical procedures to avoid thrombus formation and risk of systemic embolization. Objective. To determine prevalence of stroke after cardiac surgery with or without left atrial appendage excision in patients with atrial fibrillation. Material. Thirty-one patients with atrial fibrillation underwent cardiac surgery from January, 2020 and July, 2021 were included. They were divided into two study groups, with and without left atrial appendage excision. Relevant variables between groups were: Postoperative major bleeding, stroke and death. Results were analyzed by descriptive statistics, X2 and Student’s t-distribution. Results. Ten patients were included in the excision group and 21 in non-excision group. The indications for cardiac surgery were mainly valvular surgery, especially mitral valve operations. Two patients without left atrial appendage excision (9.5%) developed stroke, but none of the patients in the excision group (p=0.320). Patients with excision developed more events such as postoperative major bleeding and mortality, though without statistically significant difference. Conclusions. There was no statistically significant difference regarding occurrence of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery with or without left atrial appendage excision. A limitation of this study is the small sample size; therefore, we recommend to continue this study including a mayor number of patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factorfor stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.8.983.

  2. Whitlock R, Healey J, Vincent J, et al. Rationale and design of the Left Atrial AppendageOcclusion Study (LAAOS) III. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;3(1):45-54.doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.12.06.

  3. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, Ammash NM. Left atrial appendagethrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recentembolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol.1995;25(2):452-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00396-8.

  4. Hogue CW Jr, Murphy SF, Schechtman KB, Dávila-Román VG. Risk factors forearly or delayed stroke after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100(6):642-7. doi:10.1161/01.cir.100.6.642.

  5. Viles-Gonzalez JF, Kar S, Douglas P, et al. The clinical impact of incomplete leftatrial appendage closure with the Watchman Device in patients with atrial fibrillation:a PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage VersusWarfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(10):923-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.028.

  6. Sick PB, Schuler G, Hauptmann KE, et al. Initial worldwide experience with theWATCHMAN left atrial appendage system for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(13):1490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.035.

  7. Stöllberger C, Schneider B, Finsterer J. Elimination of the left atrial appendage toprevent stroke or embolism? Anatomic, physiologic, and pathophysiologic considerations.Chest. 2003;124(6):2356-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.6.2356.

  8. Sollberger C, Finsterer J, Schneider B. Arguments against left atrial appendageocclusion for stroke prevention. Stroke 2007;38:e77. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.489310.

  9. Whitlock RP, Belley-Cote EP, Paparella D, et al; LAAOS III Investigators. LeftAtrial Appendage Occlusion during Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke. N Engl JMed. 2021;384(22):2081-2091. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2101897.

  10. Badhwar V, Rankin JS, Damiano RJ Jr, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.076.

  11. Perreault S, de Denus S, White-Guay B, et al. Oral Anticoagulant PrescriptionTrends, Profile Use, and Determinants of Adherence in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.Pharmacotherapy. 2020;40(1):40-54. doi: 10.1002/phar.2350.

  12. Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgicalpatients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(2):755-9. doi:10.1016/0003-4975(95)00887-X.

  13. Squiers JJ, Edgerton JR. Surgical Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage: The Past,The Present, The Future. J Atr Fibrillation. 2018;10(5):1642. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1642.

  14. Barquera S, Campos-Nonato I, Hernandez-Barrera L, et al. Hypertension in MexicanAdults: results from the National Health and Nutrition servey 2006. Saludpublica 2010;(Suppl1):S63-71.

  15. Cantú-Brito C, Ruiz-Sandoval JL, Murillo-Bonilla LM, et al; PREMIER Investigators.Acute care and one-year outcome of Mexican patients with first-ever acuteischemic stroke: the PREMIER study. Rev Neurol. 2010;51(11):641-9.

  16. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to preventstroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med.2007;146(12):857-67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007.

  17. Kalil RAK, Zimerman LI, Avezum Á. Left Atrial Appendage Resection for Preventionof Systemic Embolism - New Scientific Evidence. Braz J CardiovascSurg. 2021;36(4):I-III. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0958.

  18. Harky A, Bithas C, Chan JSK, Snosi M, Pousios D, Muir AD. Surgical Treatmentof Atrial Fibrillation: Cutting Through the Edges. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg.2020;35(3):375-386. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0057. PMID: 32549109;PMCID: PMC7299594.

  19. Tsai YC, Phan K, Munkholm-Larsen S, Tian DH, La Meir M, Yan TD. Surgicalleft atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for patients with atrial fibrillation:a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(5):847-54. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu291.

  20. Cox JL. The first Maze procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(5):1093-7.doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.12.012.

  21. Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D'Agostino HJ Jr, et al. The surgical treatment of atrialfibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac CardiovascSurg. 1991;101(4):569-83.

  22. Badhwar V, Rankin JS, Damiano RJ Jr, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(1):329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.10.076.

  23. Garcia-Villarreal OA. Surgical Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage. Basal Considerationsbefore attempting with occluder devices. J Surg Open Access 2017;3(2): doi http://dx.doi. org/10.16966/2470-0991.144.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2023;8