medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta de Otorrinolaringología & Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello

ISSN 2539-0859 (Electronic)
ISSN 0120-8411 (Print)
Asociación Colombiana de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y cuello, Maxilofacial y Estética Facial (ACORL)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC 2023; 51 (4)

Open tracheostomy in Malvinas Argentinas health system. Our experience

León VCJ, Yanina SC, Barreras JI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 291-295
PDF size: 194.99 Kb.


Key words:

Tracheostomy, therapeutic uses, postoperative complications.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Tracheostomy is the opening and entrance of the trachea to the outside carried out to achieve a controllable and patent airway. The approach can be percutaneous and open, under general or local anesthesia, urgently or scheduled. Objective: Describe the surgical technique usually performed in Malvinas Argentinas Health System and evaluate indications and complications. Materials and methods: Retrospective descriptive study, including of patients with tracheostomy, over 18 years of age, without distinction of sex, carried out between January 2015 and June 2018, in Malvinas Argentinas. Results: 72 patients underwent surgery, 11 local anesthesia, 61 general; 15 emergency, and 57 scheduled. Average age 34.7. The technique used was open with a horizontal incision. The main indications were prolonged orotracheal intubation in 34 patients, acute laryngeal obstructive syndrome (AOLS) in 25, and difficult weaning in 6. The most frequent complications were laryngotracheal injuries in 9 patients, surgical wound infection in 5, and subcutaneous emphysema in 3. Discussion: Open technique is not the only one existing in the literature, but the good results in our service confirm its safety due to better recognition of anatomical structures and opening of the trachea. It is not possible to conclude which technique is superior, with respect to morbidity and mortality. There are differences in the place where it is performed, and it can be done in the operating room or next to the patient’s bed with adequate asepsis. Conclusion: Currently, it continues to be the technique of choice for performing this procedure in our service.


REFERENCES

  1. Che-Morales JL, Díaz-Landero P, Cortés-Tellés A. Manejointegral del paciente con traqueostomía. Neumol. cir. Tórax. 2014;73(4):254-62.

  2. Szmuk P, Ezri T, Evron S, Roth Y, Katz J. A brief history oftracheostomy and tracheal intubation, from the Bronze Age tothe Space Age. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(2):222-8. doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0931-5

  3. Maya R, Herize Padilla M. Indicaciones y complicacionesde traqueostomía en pacientes adultos. Servicio deotorrinolaringología. Hospital Central Universitario “Dr.Antonio María Pineda”. Bol méd postgrado. 2017;33(1):28-36.

  4. Rusell C, Matta B. Tracheostomy a MultiprofessionalHandbook. 1.a edición. San Francisco, California: GreenwichMedical Media Limited; 2004.

  5. Ortega P, Ulloa J, Rivas L. Experiencia clínica en traqueostomíaabierta. Rev. Otorrinolaringol. Cir. Cabeza Cuello.2011;71(2):131-34. doi: 10.4067/S0718-48162011000200005

  6. Readi R, Gómez F, Osorio J. Traqueostomía quirúrgica clásicaen la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Rev. Otorrinolaringol.Cir. Cabeza Cuello. 2015;75(1):7-12. doi: 10.4067/S0718-48162015000100002

  7. Milian WA, Contardo ME. La traqueostomía precoz mejora elpronóstico de los pacientes críticos. Interciencia; 2005:4-10.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC. 2023;51