medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Atención Familiar

ISSN 1405-8871 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Aten Fam 2024; 31 (2)

Agreement Between the Rapid Antigen Test for SARS-COV-2 and the RT-qPCR Diagnostic Test

Barrios-Pérez A, Cid-Oros I, Becerril-Gutiérrez C, Medina-Gómez OS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 62-67
PDF size: 241.62 Kb.


Key words:

Accuracy, COVID-19, RTqPCR, Antigen.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to assess the agreement between the rapid antigen testing (RATS) for SARS-COV-2 and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Methods: analytical crosssectional study, conducted in three medical units from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, in Mexico City, Mexico. Non-probabilistic sampling was performed using data from the Online Notification System for Epidemiological Surveillance. Data analysis was performed using frequency measures, Cohen’s kappa index, and maximum likelihood estimation. Results: Of 2173 participants with both diagnostic tests: 565 respiratory samples were concordant with a positive result (26.09% CI95% 24.25 - 27.99%), and 1229 with a negative result (56.55% CI95% 54.44 - 58.65%). The sensitivity of rat versus RT-qPCR was estimated to be 65.17% (95%CI 61.99 - 68.33%), while the specificity was 94.10% (95%CI 92.82 - 95.38%); a positive predictive value of 88.01% (95% CI 85.23 - 90.41%), and a negative predictive value of 80.27% (95%CI 78.19 - 82.24%). The Cohen’s kappa index was 0.62 (substantial agreement), and a calculated likelihood ratio of 40% at pre-test prevalence, a posttest probability of 88.3% was observed for a positive result with rat in case of having COVID-19. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated substantial concordance between rat and RT-qPCR, supporting the feasibility of using both tests. This provides clinicians with a valuable tool for informed decision making in the diagnostic context of COVID-19.


REFERENCES

  1. The Lancet editorial board. COVID-19 in LatinAmerica—emergency and opportunity. The Lancet. 2021;398(10295):93.

  2. Remes‐Troche JM, Velarde‐Ruiz Velasco JA. TheLiver and COVID‐19 in Mexico. Clin Liver Dis.2022;19(2):49-52.

  3. Garduño-Orbe B, Sánchez-Rebolledo JM, Cortés-Rafael M, García-Jiménez Y, Perez-Ortiz M, Mendiola-Pastrana IR, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfectionamong Healthcare Workers in Mexico: Case Reportand Literature Review. Medicina (Kaunas).2021 May 3;57(5):442.

  4. Miller TE, Garcia Beltran WF, Bard AZ, GogakosT, Anahtar MN, Astudillo MG, et al. Clinical sensitivityand interpretation of PCR and serologicalCOVID‐19 diagnostics for patients presentingto the hospital. FASEB J. 2020;34(10):13877-13884.

  5. Kumar A, Singh R, Kaur J, Pandey S, SharmaV, Thakur L, et al. Wuhan to World: The COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Cell Infect Microbiol.2021;11:596201.

  6. Sule WF, Oluwayelu DO. Real-time RT-PCR forCOVID-19 diagnosis: challenges and prospects.Pan Afr Med J. 2020;35(Suppl 2):121.

  7. Weitzel T, Legarraga P, Iruretagoyena M, PizarroG, Vollrath V, Araos R, et al. Comparative evaluationof four rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detectiontests using universal transport medium. TravelMed Infect Dis. 2021;39:101942.

  8. Gohl DM, Garbe J, Grady P, Daniel J, WatsonRHB, Auch B, et al. A rapid, cost-effective tailedamplicon method for sequencing SARS-CoV-2.BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):863.

  9. Albert E, Torres I, Bueno F, Huntley D, Molla E,Fernández-Fuentes MÁ, et al. Field evaluation ofa rapid antigen test (PanbioTM COVID-19 AgRapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis inprimary healthcare centres. Clin Microbiol Infect.2021;27(3):472.e7-472.e10.

  10. Osterman A, Badell I, Basara E, Stern M, Kriesel F,Eletreby M, et al. Impaired detection of omicronby SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests. Med MicrobiolImmunol (Berl). 2022;211(2-3):105-117.

  11. Yamayoshi S, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Koga M, AkasakaO, Nakachi I, Koh H, et al. Comparison ofRapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19. Viruses.2020;12(12):1420.

  12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The Measurement of ObserverAgreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics.1977;33(1):159-174.

  13. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihoodratios. BMJ. 2004;329(7458):168-169.

  14. Peckham H, De Gruijter NM, Raine C, RadziszewskaA, Ciurtin C, Wedderburn LR, et al. Malesex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysisas a risk factor for death and ITU admission. NatCommun. 2020;11(1):6317.

  15. COVID-19 Tablero México. COVID - 19 TableroMéxico. [Internet]. [Citado 2024 Ene 15]. Disponibleen: https://datos.covid-19.conacyt.mx/Prueba de antígenos rápida y rt-qpcrAten Fam. 2024;25(2):62-67.http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fm.14058871p.2024.287946

  16. Bongolan VP, Minoza JMA, De Castro R, SevillejaJE. Age-Stratified Infection Probabilities CombinedWith a Quarantine-Modified Model for COVID-19 Needs Assessments: Model DevelopmentStudy. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e19544.

  17. Ren SY, Wang WB, Gao RD, Zhou AM. Omicronvariant (B.1.1.529) of SARS-CoV-2: Mutation,infectivity, transmission, and vaccine resistance.World J Clin Cases. 2022;10(1):1-11.

  18. Chams N, Chams S, Badran R, Shams A, Araji A,Raad M, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. COVID-19: AMultidisciplinary Review. Front Public Health.2020;8:383.

  19. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, etal. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet.

  20. 2020;395(10223):497-506.20. Iser BPM, Sliva I, Raymundo VT, Poleto MB,Schuelter-Trevisol F, Bobinski F. Definição decaso suspeito da COVID-19: uma revisão narrativados sinais e sintomas mais frequentes entre oscasos confirmados. Epidemiol E Serviços Saúde.2020;29(3).

  21. Khalid MF, Selvam K, Jeffry AJN, Salmi MF, NajibMA, Norhayati MN, et al. Performance of RapidAntigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics.2022;12(1):110.

  22. Porte L, Legarraga P, Vollrath V, Aguilera X, MunitaJM, Araos R, et al. Evaluation of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis ofSARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples. Int J InfectDis. 2020;99:328-333.

  23. Berger A, Nsoga MTN, Perez-Rodriguez FJ, AadYA, Sattonnet-Roche P, Gayet-Ageron A, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of two commercial SARSCoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid tests at the pointof care in community-based testing centers. PLoSONE. 2021;16(3 March 2021):1-12.

  24. Lippi G, Henry BM, Plebani M. LumiraDXSARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test for DiagnosingAcute SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Critical LiteratureReview and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics.2022;12(4):947.

  25. Pandey AK, Mohanty A, Hada V, Rath RS, KumarS, Kishore S, et al. Comparison of the RapidAntigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for theDiagnosis of COVID-19. Cureus. 2021;13(8).

  26. Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Berhane S, van Wyk SS, NyaabaN, Domen J, et al. Rapid, point-of-care antigentests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group, ed. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev. 2021;2022(7).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Aten Fam. 2024;31