medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2024; 84 (1)

Migration of the intrauterine device to the bladder, associated with a tumor and bladder lithiasis: about a case

Mendoza-Chuctaya G, Ríos-Cadenillas E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 1-5
PDF size: 177.07 Kb.


Key words:

Cystoscopy, bladder cancer, migration, intrauterine devices, lower urinary symptoms.

ABSTRACT

Intrauterine devices are widely used contraceptives due to their simplicity, low cost and effectiveness. Among its complications, it rarely migrates to the bladder, predisposing to the formation of stones and bladder tumors.
Clinical case: 47-year-old woman. With disease time of ± 12 years characterized by dysuria, pollakiuria, and recurrent urinary tract infections that progressively increased. Urotomography evaluation revealed a stone and bladder tumor. During the laser treatment of the bladder stone, a foreign body compatible with an intrauterine device was found, which was removed. In addition, the pathological result of the bladder tumor showed a carcinoma with squamous differentiation, for which a radical cystectomy plus urinary diversion was performed. Our clinical case shows a rare case of migration of an intrauterine device into the bladder, which could be associated with stone formation and bladder tumor.


REFERENCES

  1. Liu G, Li F, Ao M, Huang G. Intrauterine devicesmigrated into the bladder: two case reportsand literature review. BMC Women’s Health. 2021;21(1): 301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01443-w.

  2. Cho JH, Holley JL. Squamous cell carcinoma ofthe bladder in a female associated with multiplebladder stones. BMC Research Notes. 2013;6(1): 354. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-354.

  3. Rajaian S, Kumar RM, Kekre NS. Squamouscell carcinoma associated with large bladdercalculus. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2012;82(1–2): 92–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05953.x.

  4. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, WardE, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA: ACancer Journal for Clinicians. 2011;61(2): 69–90.https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20107.

  5. Martin JW, Carballido EM, Ahmed A, FarhanB, Dutta R, Smith C, et al. Squamous cellcarcinoma of the urinary bladder: Systematicreview of clinical characteristics and therapeuticapproaches. Arab Journal of Urology. 2016;14(3):183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.07.001.

  6. Chung SD, Tsai MC, Lin CC, Lin HC. A case–control study on the association betweenbladder cancer and prior bladder calculus.BMC Cancer. 2013;13(1): 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-117.

  7. Tan J, Lip H, Ong W, Omar S. Intrauterinecontraceptive device embedded in bladder wallwith calculus formation removed successfullywith open surgery. Malaysian Family Physician :the Official Journal of the Academy of FamilyPhysicians of Malaysia. 2019;14(2): 29–31.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2024;84