medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2024, Number 1

<< Back

Simulación Clínica 2024; 6 (1)

Learning transfer from simulation-based education to clinical practice: systematic review

Uribe-Muñoz K, Hidalgo-Mancilla D

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 40-49
PDF size: 283.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: simulation-based education (SBE) has been established as a methodology to develop clinical skills in a safe and controlled environment, responding to the demand to improve the quality of care and patient safety. The evaluation of its effects is carried out mostly in simulated contexts, with a gap persisting regarding its transfer to real environments. Objective: analyze the evidence of the last five years, regarding the transfer of learning in health professionals, from SBE, to the clinical environment, focusing on technical skills and their evaluation. Material and methods: a bibliographic review was carried out with PRISMA methodology in: ScienceDirect (SD), Virtual Health Library (BVS) and PubMed. Complete texts published between 2019 and 2023 that address this topic are included. Results: 10 studies are analyzed; six quantitative, three qualitative and one mixed. Transfer of learning after training in clinical simulation (CS) is evident in 100%. The main limitations are small samples and lack of variability in geolocation of the studies. Conclusions: health professionals show effective transfer of learning to real clinical environments after SBE.


REFERENCES

  1. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1): i2-10. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i2.

  2. Seaton P, Levett-Jones T, Cant R, Cooper S, Kelly MA, McKenna L, et al. Exploring the extent to which simulation-based education addresses contemporary patient safety priorities: A scoping review. Collegian. 2019; 26 (1): 194-203. doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2018.04.006.

  3. Arrigoni C, Grugnetti AM, Caruso R, Gallotti ML, Borrelli P, Puci M. Nursing students' clinical competencies: a survey on clinical education objectives. Ann Ig. 2017 May; 29 (3): 179-188. doi: 10.7416/ai.2017.2145.

  4. Wooding EL, Gale TC, Maynard V. Evaluation of teamwork assessment tools for interprofessional simulation: a systematic literature review. J Interprof Care. 2020; 34 (2): 162-172. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1650730.

  5. Koster MA, Soffler M. Navigate the Challenges of Simulation for Assessment: A Faculty Development Workshop. MedEdPORTAL. 2021; 17: 11114. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11114.

  6. Fouillen KJ, Duncan HF, de Vries P, Chevalier V. Development and preliminary validation of an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) for a partial pulpotomy procedure. Int Endod J. 2023; 56 (8): 1011-1021. doi: 10.1111/iej.13938.

  7. Ramazani F, Wright ED, Randall DR, Lin JR, Jeffery CC. Developing an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) for Microlaryngoscopy. Laryngoscope. 2023; 133 (10): 2719-2724. doi: 10.1002/lary.30610.

  8. Beauvais AM, Phillips KE. Incorporating future of nursing competencies into a clinical and simulation assessment tool: validating the clinical simulation competency assessment tool. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020; 41 (5): 280-284. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000709.

  9. Wei J, Fang X, Qiao J, Liu H, Cui H, Wei Y, et al. Construction on teaching quality evaluation indicator system of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) clinical nursing practice in China: A Delphi study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022; 64: 103452. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103452.

  10. Andersson A, Brink E, Young KH, Skyvell Nilsson M. Development and validation of experienced work-integrated learning instrument (E-WIL) using a sample of newly graduated registered nurses - A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2023; 128: 105889. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105889.

  11. Manz JA, Tracy M, Hercinger M, Todd M, Iverson L, Hawkins K. Assessing competency: an integrative review of the Creighton simulation evaluation instrument (C-SEI) and Creighton competency evaluation instrument (C-CEI). Clin Simul Nurs. 2022; 66: 66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2022.02.003.

  12. Lavoie P, Lapierre A, Maheu-Cadotte MA, Fontaine G, Khetir I, Bélisle M. Transfer of clinical decision-making-related learning outcomes following simulation-based education in nursing and medicine: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2022; 97 (5): 738-746. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004522.

  13. Calleja JL, Soublette Sánchez A, Radedek Soto P. Is clinical simulation an effective learning tool in teaching clinical ethics? Medwave. 2020; 20 (2): e7824. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2020.01.7824.

  14. Camp S, Legge T. Simulation as a tool for clinical remediation: An integrative review. Clin Simul Nurs. 2018; 16: 48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2017.11.003.

  15. Ellis HC. The transfer of learning. 1965.

  16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

  17. Sterner A, Nilsson MS, Eklund A. The value of simulation-based education in developing preparedness for acute care situations: An interview study of new graduate nurses' perspectives. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023; 67: 103549. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103549.

  18. Sundelin A, Fagerlund MJ, Flam B, Djarv T. In-situ simulation of CPR in the emergency department - A tool for continuous improvement of the initial resuscitation. Resusc Plus. 2023; 15: 100413. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100413.

  19. Wilkinson E, Cadogan E. Radiographers' perceptions of first year diagnostic radiography students' performance following implementation of a simulation-based education model. Radiography (Lond). 2023; 29 (4): 721-728. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.05.002.

  20. Bube SH, Kingo PS, Madsen MG, Vásquez JL, Norus T, Olsen RG, et al. National implementation of simulator training improves transurethral resection of bladder tumours in patients. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 39: 29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.03.003.

  21. Skov RAC, Lawaetz J, Konge L, Westerlin L, Aasvang EK, Meyhoff CS, et al. Simulation-Based Education of Endovascular Scrub Nurses Reduces Stress and Improves Team Performance. J Surg Res. 2022; 280: 209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.030.

  22. Aruparayil N, Gnanaraj J, Maiti S, Chauhan M, Quyn A, Mishra A, et al. Training programme in gasless laparoscopy for rural surgeons of India (TARGET study) - Observational feasibility study. Int J Surg Open. 2021; 35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2021.100399.

  23. Soenens G, Lawaetz J, Bamelis AS, Nayahangan LJ, Konge L, Eiberg J, et al. International implementation of a PROficiency based StePwise Endovascular Curricular Training (PROSPECT) in daily practice. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021; 62 (6): 992-998. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.09.029.

  24. Guerrero JG, Hafiz AH, Eltohamy NAE, Gomma N, Jarrah IA. Repeated exposure to high-fidelity simulation and nursing interns' clinical performance: Impact on practice readiness. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021; 60: 18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.06.011.

  25. James HK, Pattison GTR, Griffin DR, Fisher JD. How Does Cadaveric Simulation Influence Learning in Orthopedic Residents? J Surg Educ. 2020; 77 (3): 671-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.12.006.

  26. Bruce R, Levett-Jones T, Courtney-Pratt H. Transfer of learning from university-based simulation experiences to nursing students' future clinical practice: An exploratory study. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019; 35: 17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2019.06.003




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com