medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2023; 45 (4)

Incidence and risk factors of abdominal eventration in postoperative laparotomy

González-Palacio, César Luis1; Carrillo-Gorena, Marco Javier1; Pérez-Ruiz, Manuel David1; Venegas-Yáñez, César Eduardo1; Iglesias-Palacios, Gaspar1; González-Cristóbal, Sofía Carolina1; Hernández-Estrada, Víctor Hugo2; Pérez-Echavarría, Ana Irene2; Contreras-Pacheco, Arely Estefanía2; Enríquez-Sánchez, Luis Bernardo1
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/115845

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/115845
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/115845

Language: English/Spanish [Versi?n en espa?ol]
References: 26
Page: 207-211
PDF size: 311.14 Kb.


Key words:

post-incisional ventral hernias, ventral hernias, laparotomy, incidence, eventration, abdominal.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: post-incision ventral hernias are one of the most common postoperative complications. There are different repair techniques for post-incision ventral hernias, in most cases, synthetic meshes are used, obtaining better results in terms of relapse. Objective: to report the number and incidence of post-incisional ventral hernias in postoperative patients of the scout laparotomy at the State Central Hospital. Material and methods: retrospective cross-sectional observational study, in which operating room databases were analyzed to find postoperative patients of post-incisional ventral hernia at Central Hospital from 2017 to 2018. Patients selected were contacted a year later to verify whether or not they developed post-incisional ventral hernias. Results: 74 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. A prevalence of 17.1% of patients who developed post-incisional ventral hernia during 2019 was found at the Central Hospital in Chihuahua State. The average age of the patients was 42 years. Conclusions: we find no relationship between the factors studied and the development of post-incision hernias.



INTRODUCTION

Total post-incisional ventral hernias are one of the most frequent postoperative complications; the risk of developing a hernia after elective surgery is between 5 and 20%.1,2 A post-incisional ventral hernia is defined as a palpable and visible mass no more than 3 cm from the surgical scar.3,4 The increasing incidence of post-incisional ventral hernias is due to a growing, aging population with obesity, among several other risk factors, undergoing abdominal surgeries.5-7 Some risk factors mainly associated with the appearance of hernias are infection, obesity, tobacco use, malnutrition, immunosuppressive therapy, chronic pulmonary disease, ascites, emergency surgeries, age over 70 years, hypertension, malignancy, and connective tissue defects; they produce failure in the repair of the injured tissue at the time of the surgical procedure so that its anatomical structure is compromised and is reflected as a defect of the abdominal wall.5 Obesity is one of the most frequent risk factors in the development of post-incisional ventral hernias;8 about 2/3 of patients with ventral hernias suffer from obesity, having a body mass index greater than 30, in addition to reporting a recurrence of between 30 and 40%.2,9 The increasing incidence of post-incisional ventral hernias is due to a growing population, aging with both obesity and major abdominal surgeries, which predisposes to a lower quality of repair and collagen created.

Wall closure could also be considered a predisposing factor for the appearance of ventral hernias; the type of suture material used to perform it has been questioned. Histologically, two subtypes of macrophages are known: subtype 1 has proinflammatory properties, and subtype 2 contains regulators of extracellular matrix remodeling. An increased expression of type 2 macrophages was found with polydioxanone (PDS) in the early days. Type 2 macrophages favor fibroblast activity, which is why they are considered a good prognostic factor and could positively affect abdominal wall repair. This activity provides arguments for closing the abdominal wall with polydioxanone sutures compared to vicryl or prolene.10

Using meshes for repair is a common practice, either open or laparoscopic, and their use produces a lower percentage of recurrence. However, they have an essential disadvantage since they increase the risk of infection, erosion, and fistula formation, and even mesh migration can occur.11 The causes of this migration can be classified into two: those produced mechanically due to the patient's movement and those that occur secondary to erosion of the surrounding tissues.12,13

For hernia repair, mesh placement can be performed laparoscopically.14,15 It is a procedure that consists of patching the abdominal wall defect with a non-absorbable mesh attached to the wall.16-19 Post-incisional hernias recur up to 44% after the first repair. Recurrence with the laparoscopic technique is comparable to that of the open technique.20,21 The laparoscopic technique is only sometimes possible due to the hernia size (greater than 7 cm).22-25

This study aims to define the incidence of post-incisional ventral hernias in postoperative exploratory laparotomy patients at the Central State Hospital and find a relationship between risk factors and suture material used for closure.



MATERIAL AND METHODS

This report refers to an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, retrospective study developed at the Hospital Central del Estado, Chihuahua, Mexico. Operating room and records databases were analyzed to find cases that underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy surgery at the hospital from 2017 to 2018.

In the clinical records, the suture material used for abdominal wall closure was investigated. The selected patients were contacted one year later to corroborate whether or not they developed post-incisional ventral hernias. In addition, post-surgical notes from the clinical records were analyzed to define the type of closure and suture used in the exploratory laparotomy. The data obtained were analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics 22 software.

Inclusion criteria: patients over 18 years of age, of either sex, undergoing exploratory laparotomy at the Chihuahua State Central Hospital between 2017 and 2018 were included.

Exclusion criteria: subjects who had not undergone exploratory laparotomy or cases in which this was not performed at the State Central Hospital. Patients under 18 years of age or who did not have informed consent issued by the institution signed by the patient where he/she cedes the information of his/her file.



RESULTS

The subjects considered for the study were 126; 40 were excluded based on the exclusion criteria, and 12 were eliminated due to a lack of necessary data in the clinical record. For the study, 74 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. The sample size necessary to obtain a confidence level of 95% and power of 80% was calculated as 73 patients.

We found a 17.1% incidence of patients who developed post-incisional ventral hernia during 2019. The mean age was 42 years. A correlation was sought between the development of post-incisional ventral hernias and the factors: sex, age, surgical wound classification, and type of suture used for abdominal wall closure. No statistically significant relationship was found when comparing the incidence of post-incisional ventral hernia and the sex of the person (female, p=0.76, OR: 0.813, 95%CI: 0.216-3.065; male, p=0.76, OR: 1.230, 95%CI: 0.326-4.635). There was no significant difference by suture material used (polypropylene, p=0.484, OR: 2.292, 95%CI: 0.212-24.801; polydioxanone, p=1.204, OR: 0.405, 95%CI: 0.077-2.120; vicryl, p=0.458, OR: 1.742, 95%CI: 0.397-7.643). The rest of the results are shown in Table 1.



DISCUSSION

In this series, we found an incidence of 17.1% of patients who developed ventral hernia, consistent with that reported in the literature, ranging from 5 to 20%.1,2

Most patients were male (63.3%), but no statistically significant difference was found concerning females. Most of the subjects who developed post-incisional ventral hernia were in the 18-30 and 44-56 age ranges. It is important to note that, contrary to what is mentioned in the literature, being close to 70 years of age or older than 70 did not increase the incidence of hernias.1,2

Regarding the material used for wall closure, the most used in our institution is vicryl used in 53.4% of cases, followed by polydioxanone (41.4%) and prolene (5.2%). Although the percentage of recurrence was lower in the case of polydioxanone, the probability value calculations did not show a significant value to be able to conclude that any material is more effective in this study, contrary to the literature that mentions greater efficacy of closure when using polydioxanone.10

No statistical significance was found when analyzing the rest of the risk factors.

Among the study's considerations, we must take into account the surgical technique used for closure, the surgeon who performed it, and his experience with the procedure; however, the study's objectives were met since the incidence of post-incisional ventral hernias or abdominal eventrations in our environment and their relationship with the risk factors and suture material used were defined.



CONCLUSIONS

The incidence in our setting is like that described in the literature.1,2 No statistically significant relationship was found between the variables analyzed; a possible explanation for this is that the appearance or development of post-incisional hernias could be an outcome that depends on the surgeon's expertise and experience.26


REFERENCES

  1. Pizza F, D'Antonio D, Arcopinto M, Dell'Isola C, Marvaso A. Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh following midline laparotomy in clean/contemned field: preliminary results of a randomized double blind prospective trial. Hernia. 2020; 24: 85-92. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02025-4.

  2. Sheen AJ, Pilkington JJ, Baltatzis M, Tyurkylmaz A, Stathakis P, Jamdar S, et al. Comparison of mesh fixation techniques in elective laparoscopic repair of incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2018; 18: 46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.

  3. Berrevoet F, Doerhoff C, Muysoms F, Hopson S, Muzi MG, Nienhuijs S, et al. Open ventral hernia repair with a composite ventral patch - final results of a multicenter prospective study. BMC Surg. 2019; 19: 93. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0555-z.

  4. Barreiro G, de Lima VS, Cavazzola LT. Abdominal skin tensile strength in aesthetic and massive weight loss patients and its role in ventral hernia repair. BMC Surg. 2019; 19: 68. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0523-7.

  5. Aicher BO, Woodall J, Tolaymat B, Calvert C, Monahan TS, Toursavadkohi S. Does perfusion matter? Preoperative prediction of incisional hernia development. Hernia. 2021; 25: 419-425. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02018-3.

  6. Liang MK, Bernardi K, Holihan JL, Cherla DV, Escamilla R, Lew DF, et al. Modifying risks in ventral hernia patients with prehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018; 268: 674-680. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002961.

  7. Demetrashvili Z, Pipia I, Loladze D, Metreveli T, Ekaladze E, Kenchadze G, et al. Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2017; 37: 65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.008.

  8. Winters H, Knaapen L, Buyne OR, Hummelink S, Ulrich DJO, van Goor H, et al. Pre-operative CT scan measurements for predicting complications in patients undergoing complex ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique. Hernia. 2019; 23: 347-354. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01899-8.

  9. Elstner KE, Read JW, Saunders J, Cosman PH, Rodriguez-Acevedo O, Jacombs ASW, et al. Selective muscle botulinum toxin A component paralysis in complex ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2020; 24: 287-293. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01939-3.

  10. van Steensel S, van den Hil LCL, Bloemen A, Gijbels MJ, Breukink SO, Melenhorst J, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia using different suture materials for closing the abdominal wall: a comparison of PDS, Vicryl and Prolene in a rat model. Hernia. 2020; 24: 67-78. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01941-9.

  11. Manzini G, Henne-Bruns D, Kremer M. Severe complications after mesh migration following abdominal hernial repair: report of two cases and review of literature. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2019; 8: Doc09. doi: 10.3205/iprs000135.

  12. Petersson P, Montgomery A, Petersson U. Modified peritoneal flap hernioplasty versus retromuscular technique for incisional hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Surg. 2020; 109: 279-288. doi: 10.1177/1457496919863943.

  13. Kockerling F. Onlay technique in incisional hernia repair-a systematic review. Front Surg. 2018; 5: 71. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00071.

  14. Van Hoef S, Tollens T. Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach? Hernia. 2019; 23: 915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02031-6.

  15. Wang D, Chen J, Chen Y, Han Y, Zhang H. Prospective analysis of epigastric, umbilical, and small incisional hernia repair using the modified kugel oval patch. Am Surg. 2018; 84: 305-308.

  16. Kallinowski F, Gutjahr D, Vollmer M, Harder F, Nessel R. Increasing hernia size requires higher GRIP values for a biomechanically stable ventral hernia repair. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019; 42: 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.04.002.

  17. Ahonen-Siirtola M, Nevala T, Vironen J, Kossi J, Pinta T, Niemelainen S, et al. Laparoscopic versus hybrid approach for treatment of incisional ventral hernia: a prospective randomized multicenter study of 1-month follow-up results. Hernia. 2018; 22: 1015-1022. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1784-2.

  18. Saijo F, Tokumura H, Narushima Y, Matsumura N, Sato K, Okazaki Y. The quality of life after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with closure and non-closure of fascial defect. Surg Today. 2019; 49: 942-947. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01834-5.

  19. Brosi P, Glauser PM, Speich B, Kaser SA, Maurer CA. Prophylactic intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement reduces the risk of incisional hernia, two-year results of a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2018; 42: 1687-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4363-2.

  20. Kockerling F. What do we know about the chevrel technique in ventral incisional hernia repair? Front Surg. 2019; 6: 15. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00015.

  21. Radu VG. Retromuscular approach in ventral hernia repair - endoscopic rives-stoppa procedure. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019; 114: 109-114. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.1.109.

  22. Gherghinescu MC, Copotoiu C, Lazar AE, Popa D, Mogoanta SS, Molnar C. Continuous local analgesia is effective in postoperative pain treatment after medium and large incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2017; 21: 677-685. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1625-8.

  23. Then EO, John F, Ofosu A, Gaduputi V. Anterior hepatic herniation: an unusual presentation of abdominal incisional hernia. Cureus. 2019; 11: e4066. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4066.

  24. Mortensen AR, Grossmann I, Rosenkilde M, Wara P, Laurberg S, Christensen P. Double-blind randomized controlled trial of collagen mesh for the prevention of abdominal incisional hernia in patients having a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneus flap during surgery for advanced pelvic malignancy. Colorectal Dis. 2017; 19: 491-500. doi: 10.1111/codi.13552.

  25. Clay L, Stark B, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K. Full-thickness skin graft vs. synthetic mesh in the repair of giant incisional hernia: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Hernia. 2018; 22: 325-332. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1712-x.

  26. Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Becerra AZ, Xu Z, Hensley BJ, Noyes K, et al. Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: a population-based analysis. Surgery. 2017; 162: 628-639. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.013.



AFFILIATIONS

1 Department of General Surgery, Hospital Central del Estado. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.

2 Research. School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Autonomous University of Chihuahua. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.



CORRESPONDENCE

Luis Bernardo Enríquez-Sánchez, MD. E-mail: investigacionhcu@gmail.com




Received: 01/04/2023. Accepted: 11/24/2023

Table 1

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2023;45