medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 50

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2024; 13 (50)

Clinical simulation as educative strategy for clinical reasoning development of undergraduate physiotherapy students

Westermeier CG, Monrroy UM, Barría PM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 122-130
PDF size: 538.52 Kb.


Key words:

Clinical reasoning, competency-based education, simulation training, physical therapy specialty.

ABSTRACT

Clinical reasoning is described as a fundamental pillar within the curriculum of different health careers and the methodologies and didactics must tend towards significant learning that promotes this competence.
During and after the COVID-19 pandemic, there were restrictions on access to clinical settings, which forced the design of teaching strategies that could partly make up for this deficit. The objective of this article is to describe the experience of implementing simulation strategies for the development of clinical reasoning in the context of a pandemic in physiotherapy students at a Chilean university In two consecutive academic semesters, clinical telesimulation was initially carried out for two courses (semester 1) and later, upon return to face-to-face, activities in a simulated learning environment (semester 2). Three simulation scenarios were developed in each semester. For the preparation and content of the scenarios, the orientation of a comprehensive approach was used as a basis, involving the person in the center of the physiotherapy work, and considering that this person interacts with a context.
The environments had a focus on function/health and dysfunction/disease and the incorporation of the scenarios during each semester was based on the execution of the physiotherapy process. Low (role play) and high fidelity (standardized patients) were used; 120 students, four teacher facilitators, two actors and two assistants participated. The clinical simulation allowed the achievement of most of the learning outcomes raised in the subjects, through the implementation of a clinical practice in a safe environment with a training orientation. Even though anxiety and unrest were evident in some cases, in general the students valued this experience as an enriching educational strategy.


REFERENCES

  1. Da Bove V, Seguel F, Arteaga R, Antileo C, Carmona P.Razonamiento clínico en carreras de la salud: percepción deestudiantes y docentes. Rev Med Chile. 2022;150(11):1526-33. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022001101526

  2. Arteaga R, Monrroy M, Burgos M, Tiznado G, DomínguezA, Barrientos M. Proyecto de innovación curricular - Programade la carrera de Kinesiología. Universidad Australde Chile. 2007.

  3. Colegio de Kinesiólogos de Chile. Guía práctica de telerehabilitaciónpara kinesiólogos (Chile). 2020.

  4. Ghimire S, Kachapati A. Simulation in nursing education:Review of research. J Univers Coll Med Sci. 2020;8(2):82-6.http//doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v8i02.34308

  5. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB.Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practicalguide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):e1511-30. http//doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632.

  6. Escudero E, Avendaño Ben-Azul M, Domínguez CancinoK. Simulación clínica y seguridad del paciente: integraciónen el currículo de enfermería. Sci Med. 2018;28(1): http://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.1.28853

  7. Huhn K, Gilliland SJ, Black LL, Wainwright SF, Christensen N.Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapy: A Concept Analysis.Phys Ther. 2019;99(4):440-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy148

  8. Guccione A, Neville B, George S. Optimization of Movement:A dynamical systems approach to movement systemsas emergent phenomena. Phys Ther. 2019;99(1):3-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy116

  9. Torres G, Villagrán I, Fuentes J, Araya JP, Jouannet C, Fuentes-López E. Interactive virtual scenarios as a technologicalresource to improve musculoskeletal clinical reasoningskills of undergraduate physiotherapy students. PhysiotherTheory Pract. 2022;38(8):1016-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2020.1809043

  10. Plackett R, Kassianos AP, Mylan S, Kambouri M, Raine R,Sheringham J. The effectiveness of using virtual patient educationaltools to improve medical students’ clinical reasoningskills: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):365.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03410-x.

  11. Brentnall J, Thackray D, Judd B. Evaluating the clinicalreasoning of student health professionals in placementand simulation settings: A systematic review. Int J EnvironRes Public Health. 2022;19(2):936. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020936

  12. Subramaniam T, Aznal SS, Ikram MA. Evolution of ClinicalSimulation Training and Pandemic-Led Acceleration:The International Medical University (IMU), MalaysiaJourney. Med Sci Educ. 2023;33: In Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01916-7

  13. Mendoza-Maldonado Y, Barría-Pailaquilén RM. Simulatedlearning environment experience in nursing students forpaediatric practice. Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2018;28(3):205-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.02.004.

  14. Sotomayor VE. Un nuevo horizonte para el desarrollo decompetencias mediante Simulación Clínica en Fisioterapia/Kinesiología. Movimiento Científico. 2018;12(2):1-4.

  15. Pritchard SA, Blackstock FC, Nestel D, Keating JL. SimulatedPatients in Physical Therapy Education: SystematicReview and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(9):1342-53.https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150500

  16. Greenwood KC, Ewell SB. Faculty development throughsimulation-based education in physical therapist education.Adv Simul (Lond). 2018;3:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-017-0060-3

  17. Cheng A, Grant V, Dieckmann P, Arora S, Robinson T,Eppich W. Faculty Development for Simulation Programs:Five Issues for the Future of Debriefing Training.Simul Healthc. 2015;10(4):217-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000090

  18. McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Alrabah R, Yarris LM. Telesimulation:An Innovative Tool for Health Professions Education.AEM Educ Train. 2017;1(2):132-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10015

  19. Plackett R, Kassianos AP, Timmis J, Sheringham J, SchartauP, Kambouri M. Using Virtual Patients to Explore the ClinicalReasoning Skills of Medical Students: Mixed MethodsStudy. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e24723. https://doi.org/10.2196/24723.

  20. Sandoval-Cuellar C, Alfonso-Mora ML, Castellanos-GarridoAL, Del Pilar Villarraga-Nieto A, Goyeneche-OrtegónRL, Acosta-Otalora ML, Del Pilar Castellanos-Vega R,Cobo-Mejía EA. Simulation in physiotherapy students forclinical decisions during interaction with people with lowback pain: randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ.2021;21(1):375. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02812-7.

  21. Azuara ND, Rojas IE, Luna-de-la-Garza MV, Castorena-Ibarr J, Cabrera MV. Análisis de la ansiedad en los primerosencuentros clínicos: experiencias utilizando la simulaciónclínica en estudiantes de pregrado. Educ Med. 2020;21(6):377-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.12.012




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2024;13